40 years A German convicted of pedophilia, serving over 9 years in prison, after his conviction changed his sex evidence and demands treatment as a woman. He besides claims to have been "detractively" searched by an officer and so insulted him. The court sentenced him to a fine of EUR 400, but he does not forgive – he cites the self-determination bill and wants to go to prison for women. The authorities refuse, including safety issues. The case is controversial, and the convict himself announces a fight even before the constitutional tribunal.
A German pedophile claims to have changed sex and wants to be transferred to the women's ward. Case described by the portal doczland.info has become 1 of the most striking examples of tensions between the legal thought of "sex self-determination" and the realities of safety and justice. Convicted of serious sex crimes against children, a man has made a formal sex change and demands that he be transferred to women's prison.
A key component of this case is the German sex self-determination Act, which allows for sex change in papers only on the basis of a message at the office. Without the request for medical examinations or expert opinions. In practice this means that sex – from a legal point of view – becomes a declarative category, not a biological one, which is simply a complete anti-scientific nonsense. However, it agrees with the ideological approach to this subject.
In this peculiar case, a convicted person, serving over 9 years in prison for serious sexual offences, after his conviction changed the data in the registry and began demanding treatment as a woman. At the same time, there were doubts by experts as to the authenticity of this declaration. So the problem is not abstract – it concerns a peculiar conflict between the letter of the law and its applicable effects.
The most controversial aspect of this case concerns the effort to usage the fresh rules to change the terms of the penalty. The convict argues that as a female he should not be searched by a man and that he deserves a place in a women's prison. On the another hand, the apparent question arises: does the transfer of a biological male convicted of sexual crimes to a female prison pose no threat to the inmates there, the real women? Even the German court pointed out applicable difficulties, e.g. in the context of common spaces specified as showers.
It is here that the fundamental problem is revealed – the law that was to defend a peculiar group can be utilized instrumentally in a way contrary to its first purpose. This is not an isolated case. In Germany, situations have already been reported in which convicted or extremists have utilized fresh government to improve their legal or penitentiary situation. This raises the question of the plan of the strategy itself: whether the law should be based solely on an individual’s declaration, but whether it must besides take account of nonsubjective criteria and possible risks.
In the present form, German regulations seem to ignore this second element, leading to situations where the state apparatus faces conflicting obligations: the protection of individual rights and the safeguarding of others. To mention to this situation as "hucpy" is in no case a publicist exaggeration, but a reflection of the real ideological fixation of the German legal system. The law, which can be utilized so easy in the context of specified serious crimes, loses its seriousness and credibility.
The deficiency of verification mechanisms opens up an abuse field. In the criminal law system, where people's safety is at stake, specified gaps are peculiarly dangerous. It is all the more painful that the only origin determining their origin and functioning is the utmost left-wing ideology of gender/neolysenkoism.
OUR COMMENTS: If the law ceases to recognise fundamental technological facts about the sex of man and separate between real sex and apparent manipulation, we are faced with collective obstinateness. German law, alternatively of strengthening assurance in the state institutions undermines it, creating chaos and a deficiency of control over the situation.
In this situation, there is only a deficiency of a disgusting pedophile starting to “identify” as a kid and demanding a transfer to a kindergarten. Kids can't go to jail.
We besides recommend: The Ukrainian female set her hair on fire
