With my eyes. Commentary on 'Constitution, TK, Courts and Power' Legion / leo

Little space under your thoughts, the comment I decided to post, as a separate article. What's his name, what's his name?



Behind the 7 mountains, behind the 7 forests, somewhere in the desert a bus crashed, which picked up random passengers along the way. The driver lost his way, the accident was so serious that both he and respective travelers were killed. aid me out of nowhere, the phones don't have reception. After a brief solidarity connected with mourning the dead and the funeral, the community divided into exclamation groups. I've cut the profanity.

– Who told him to go this way?
– And he's fine, he's an old commie.
There's no way the bus could fall over that tiny stone.
– It's worth an autopsy, individual might have poisoned him.
– They say he was drinking secretly, God saw it.
– The wheel shouldn't fall off like that, who let that part of junk move?
– I've got to get to my luggage, my shirt is clean.
– Let's put it on wheels, effort to fix it.
– You can't, don't touch.
- People, the sun burns, there's no water, there's no communication, move!
– The engine most likely broke down anyway.
Smart guy, he'd like to sit behind the wheel.
– (...)

Continue?
...................................................................................................................................

The first and cardinal bone of disagreement, which represents an impenetrable wall, about half the dividing our society, is the deficiency of uniformity of concepts. Without this, any effort to make any common position between the opponents is doomed to failure. An example and 1 of the most crucial is the approach to widely understood freedoms and freedoms. These concepts, unambiguous to the Liberal or Social Democrat, to the right-wing man (from the barely grey one, through black 1 to brown one) constitute a limitation of the influence on the individual, namely the deficiency of freedom and freedom to exercise power. That's the way it goes since the household model. In general, according to right-wing thinking, people should live by the rules created by right-wingers, which concern themselves only selectively. The right hand in a brown shade must additionally have a leader and an enemy, preferably weaker than himself, due to the fact that successes build and the mantra is bored.

Short mention of liberals. This planet view besides has its shades. In the marginal form, it rubs against social Darwinism and implementation of the regulations as above. Examples in different places of the world. As in evolution. She truly proved that if individual is not a fireman or mountaineer, it's best if they halt halfway between a burning home and a cliff.

The Social politician is simply a rationalist, a right-wing man with no arguments will invoke indeterminate “natural laws” and the Bible as a origin of all rights and information about everything. Incidentally, a cup of coffee contains more information, and this is entirely in line with modern science. For any reason, in the highly secularized Scandinavian countries, where social democrats have traditionally and for years been governed by advanced taxes to finance social services, investigation shows the highest level of satisfaction of citizens with their lives and the level of assurance in power. Nobody minds that there is simply a Bible in all hotel area in the drawer.

Constitutional Tribunal (in many countries this function is performed by the ultimate Court). The algorithm of taking power, beginning with his mastery, Hitler after winning the election by the NSDAP and gaining 43.9% of the vote borrowed from Mussolini. At the writers of historians for cracks. I'm afraid nothing can be built in the swamp they turned him into. From election to election, time goes by, concepts go down and nothing. For the inn and lift of Godzilla with a desk or construction of a parallel body, even for an effective drag into the labour court dispute, Tusk didn't dare. possibly it's a fear of Union bureaucrats who could read it as an assassination effort on the regulation of law, like if they tried to push Erdogan distant from power? possibly it's the PSL that pulled the brake again, possibly the Holownia? I don't know.

The fresh or renewed Court will always rise. I would not like it to be as it was (even before the PiS seized) in which, in fact, the president decided on all sentence. I do not want to see in this function any more Zolla or Rzeplinskis, who seemed to forget that it was not the Vatican and not the Prime Minister who nominated them and not the Bible, and Polish law is to supply guidelines for their work.