A scandal in the Sejm with the German flag. Hołównia did not stand: “This number is good!”

dailyblitz.de 14 hours ago

Tuesday's session of the Sejm began with scenes that will long be recorded in the chronicles of Polish parliamentaryism. alternatively of a substantive debate, the plenary area became an arena for political happening organised by the MP of Law and Justice, Darius Matecki. His provocative action, consisting in bringing the flag of Germany to the platform, sparked an immediate and acute reaction of Marshal Simon Holownia and Minister of National Defence, Władysław Kosiniak-Kamish. This incidental is another installment of the heated dispute over migration policy and safety at the Polish-German border.

The event was not accidental. It was a carefully planned political manifestation aimed at attacking Donald Tusk's government and accusing him of allegedly favoring Berlin's interests. Matecki's motion rapidly polarized the political scene and moved the discussion of the safety of the state from a strategical level to the level of symbolic, seismic war. What happened in the plenary area is simply a perfect example of how deep political divisions in Poland affect the functioning of the highest authorities of the state.

An unexpected happening at the beginning of the meeting. What precisely happened?

Just after the beginning of the Tuesday session of the Sejm, Mr PiS Dariusz Mateckiwithout waiting for a formal voice, he entered the platform. He held not only notes, but besides the German flag and a copy of the German newspaper. However, it did not aim at standard parliamentary intervention. After a brief introduction, the politician approached the government benches and placed the German flag in an empty space for the Prime Minister Donald Tusk.

He justified his action with accusations against the head of government. He accused him of serving the German State and pursuing policies consistent with Berlin's interests, especially in the context of the situation on the Polish-German border. This was a direct attack which was intended to discredit the Prime Minister in the eyes of the public and to present him as a politician acting against Poland. The full event was a carefully directed performance, calculated to trigger maximum media publicity.

The lightning ripost of the Marshal Holowna. ‘This number is already working’

The talker of the Sejm immediately responded to the provocation of Matecki, Simon Holovnia. Without even trying to hide his irritation and fatigue, he interrupted the happening policy of the PiS. His comment was brief, but highly clear and rapidly became a vortex on social media. – A Jesus, this number is so good. Yeah, man, really. – he casts irony in his voice, indicating that he considers specified forms of protest to be worn out and ridiculous.

The marshal's reaction showed his attitude towards this kind of political theatre. alternatively of engaging in a polemic with associate Matecki, Holovnia chose to discredit the form of the protest itself, identifying it as a inexpensive and repetitive play. In his opinion, specified actions do not contribute anything substantive to public debate, and their sole goal is to make chaos and fuel negative emotions. The marshal's firm attitude was to reconstruct the order and seriousness of the Sejm's deliberations.

Minister of defence doesn't leave a dry thread. "This has nothing to do with security"

The incidental was besides referred to by the Minister of National Defence present in the Chamber, Władysław Kosiniak-Kamish. The head of the MON powerfully criticized the usage of national symbols of another country to conduct interior political disputes. In his opinion, specified actions are not only unimportant but besides detrimental to Poland's image on the global stage.

The Minister accused the politicians of Law and Justice and the Confederacy of cynically reaching for national symbols to gain temporary publicity and to rise political capital. – It's a happening that has nothing to do with real state safety concerns. said Kosiniak-Kamish. He stressed that actual care for borders and sovereignty requires serious strategical and diplomatic action, not seismic demonstrations. His message was a clear signal that the government treated specified actions as an effort to divert attention from real problems and its own omissions from the past.

In the background, a dispute over border and migration. Why did the German flag go to the Sejm?

Happening MP Matecki didn't come out of nowhere. It is another component of the heated debate on the situation on the Polish-German border and the migration policy of the government. The right-wing opposition has for weeks accused Donald Tusk's cabinet of inaction and failure of control over the flow of migrants who enter Germany from Poland. In the PiS and Confederacy narrative, there are besides accusations of alleged admission to the activities of German "citizens" in Poland.

The government rejects these allegations, indicating that the problem of uncontrolled migration has its origin in the activities of the erstwhile team. The ruling coalition recalls the alleged visa scandal, in which thousands of migrants were to be sent to Poland without appropriate verification. The German flag in the Sejm has thus become a symbol by which the opposition attempts to attribute to the current government the work for the crisis which, according to the coalition, it itself has caused. This is simply a classical example of shifting work and pursuing a policy based on accusations alternatively than facts.

A symbolic dimension of conflict. What does this mean for Polish politics?

The Tuesday incidental in the Sejm is proof that the political dispute in Poland is increasingly moving from the substantive plane to the level of symbolic gestures and provocation. The flag of a abroad state utilized as props in political combat is no longer just part of the debate, but becomes a weapon in the war on narrative. specified actions aim to mobilise the hard electorate and dominate media coverage, even at the expense of the importance of the highest state institutions.

For citizens, this means 1 thing: further polarisation and erosion of public debate. alternatively of discussing real solutions to safety or migration problems, they receive a performance that is designed to trigger emotions alternatively than lead to constructive conclusions. In the long term, specified actions undermine assurance in politicians and institutions and hinder the building of a cross-party consensus on key issues for the state.

More here:
A scandal in the Sejm with the German flag. Hołównia did not stand: “This number is good!”

Read Entire Article