Marcin Bogdan: knowing words

With the division of the Roman Empire in 395 into 2 independent states, 1 with the spiritual capital in Rome, and the another with the capital in Constantinople, in the western part of the universal language began to take over Latin. In time, Latin became a universal language for Europe as a whole, utilized to communicate between countries and nations. In Poland, Latin spread immediately after baptism and the formation of statehood in 966, and remained in authoritative language until the time of partitions.

Latin has besides become the universal language of Christianity. The Holy Mass was celebrated in Latin, services were held and sermons were preached. Since the Reformation of the 16th century, Protestants have gradually left Latin for national languages. In the Catholic Church, the liturgy was held almost exclusively in Latin, until the Second Vatican Council, which was held from 1962 to 1965. Although the Council did not ban liturgy in Latin, it allowed the Holy Mass to be celebrated in its native languages, which in practice rapidly eliminated Latin from the Catholic Church's liturgy. Latin, like Greek, has ceased to be a language of communication between nations, has ceased to teach it, has ceased to realize it, and the Catholic Church has even begun to destruct Latin from its liturgy through various regulations or even formal prohibitions.

And after that, understanding of words In Latin, the Latin word “abortion” was introduced to society erstwhile Latin became a alien and completely incomprehensible. It sounds harmless due to the fact that it's incomprehensible. The word abortion comes from Latin (abortus, abortio) and means ‘intended miscarriage“ That is knowingly induced. ” It is derived from the verb “aboririIn Latin, it meant “to abort”, “to disappear”, “to die.” If individual dies due to individual else intended actionThis is nothing but murder, nothing but murder. If ‘Poles do not Goose that they have their own language“ Then why do we usage the Latin word in this matter? Are we blocking Latin in the hope that it will soften and civilize what is truly behind this term?

Why do doctors or politicians talk about abortion, not killing, murdering? Why does the doctor ask a Polish female in Latin if she wants to have an abortion, alternatively of asking in Polish if she wants to kill her child? Why do priests, in sermons and confessionals, usage so badly seen Latin in the Church and talk about abortion alternatively of talking about killing? A fewer days ago, 8 October, Parliamentary Extraordinary Commission, remark, on "abortion’, adopted 2 draft laws «abortion’. The usage of these Latin terms by coalition MPs on 13 December is not surprising. I feel like most of them don't realize what they're saying. They think they are Europeans, so they usage abroad words that they do not understand. But why should right-wing media, I should actually compose why Polish media, as well as Catholic media, usage Latin alternatively of informing that on 8 October the Sejm Extraordinary Commission on Homicide adopted 2 draft laws on killing children? Why?

In fresh days, many appeals have come to my email address and to my phone: “Stop abortionIt’s okay. ” Where do we live, who are we, that we hide behind Latin terms? Poles? I talk and compose in Polish, so I appeal in Polish: reader, halt killing, halt killing children.

No, it is no coincidence that killing children is trying to hide under the Latin word “abortion”. From the same satanic whisper, the word "euthanasia" was introduced into the social circulation. This word comes not from Latin, but from Greek. Word euthanasia (εὐθανασία) is the consequence of a combination of 2 Greek words: "Eu“ Good, beautiful, and “thanatos“ — death. So the word euthanasia It means a good death. And what is good death? Good death is natural death, fast and free from suffering. A good death is 1 that comes naturally, to old age, without long and painful agony. If a good death is simply a natural death, can a good death be determined? That's absurd. The assessment of death, whether it was good or not, is simply a very subjective issue. Actually, the only individual who has the right to an nonsubjective assessment is the dying one. another people's assessments will always be subjective, wishful, a form of comfort for those who have lost individual close to them. How, then, can we even talk of a good death erstwhile another individual and that another individual then justice it? If we're asking individual to die, we're committing murder. So why don't we talk Polish, or do you want individual to kill you right? Why do we give a doctor, give another man, give another individual the right to kill well? Why do we hide this fact under a abroad Greek word euthanasia? due to the fact that it will soften and civilize what is truly behind that term?

The scale of killing children is devastating, and the method of killing is frequently barbarous. On the law-making side, the same people who want to legally warrant us good death let this. The question must be whether we are inevitably going to a time erstwhile interficeration will be a fundamental, inalienable human right. It's a Latin word. After all, it would be incorrect to say in Polish that it is allowed to kill someone, that everyone has the right to do so. But aliquem interficere sounds perfect, fits into the fundamental rights of modern man, a actual homo-European. We're gonna gotta interficerate them, due to the fact that if we don't, they're interficerating us. That's the law, that's the law, the law of the European jungle. Unless we halt the killing of children, unless we halt the statutory right to good death. Let's do this before we get interficerated. This is the last bell.

Mr Bogdan

* * Oh, * *