Heath Review (Note, Suchar) Cyclical #137

piknik-na-skraju-glupoty.blogspot.com 1 month ago

Starting to compose this The review I have the silent hope that writing it will be like riding a bike, due to the fact that I haven't written the Reviews in a long time (no, it wasn't, due to the fact that I spent a fewer weeks working on it). Although I immediately mention that it will be somewhat monothematic (the alternate was to hold the review and compose another "thematic" wall of text).

The first fire will go on a subject that may not be peculiarly important, but is highly annoying to me. We'll start from the end. Well, a fewer days ago Paulina Matysiak (and I think you already know ocb on the subject) wrote on Eloneks that the court decided that Newag was to get distant from her. With this Newag it was so that in December 2023 an article appeared on Onetu pages, in which 1 could read that the above mentioned company most likely uploads to trains software that makes trains unwilling to ride erstwhile they are being serviced by any non-Newag (if individual is curious in this subject then in the sources will be a full bucket of links).

Newag was a bit upset and, for example, sued hackers from the Dragon Sector group (they were the ones messing with trains on behalf of another railway companies) suggesting that they might have been the ones who “played” blocking software into trains. Then it turned out that it was most likely not the hackers who uploaded it, due to the fact that Newag changed his head and there was no word in the suit about it. Incidentally, at the beginning of 2025 Onet described another case of the train, which after the "view" stopped driving.

Paulina Matysiak besides spoke on this peculiar subject and rushed (as opposed to Impulses with blocking software) Newag sued her. If anyone would like to read a speech-grass, I powerfully encourage you to read an article on this subject, due to the fact that there is simply a Newagu message quoted. In the same article, she said what she said from the Parliamentary talker and during the work of the Committee on Infrastructure. And that's very important, due to the fact that if it were that Paulina Matysiak was walking around the city sober as Sławomir Mentzen after gathering the voters and she yelled that Newag was doing what Karas did in "Fanatyk". But it just so happens that she said another things about Newagu and did it as part of fulfilling her MP's mandate.

Thus, the case of the suit was more or little as simple as the construction of an average confederate supporter who believes in Berkowicz's explanations regarding his failed purchases in Ikea (that will be further). And although with Polish judges it is never possible to be 100% certain that they will regulation in accordance with the RAGCz, in this situation it was possible to be certain that if any lawyer smeared a motion to dismiss the proceedings (or to dismiss the lawsuit, I do not know, I am not a lawyer) due to immunity, the case will end there. Thus, erstwhile Paulina Matysiak posted information on Eloneks that Newag, however, had besides short hands although many people enjoyed it, no 1 was so surprised.

And if it all ended there wouldn't be a request to talk about it. Only the day after her first entry was posted by the second one, in which she thanked Mr. Bartosz Lewandowski for his professional aid (yes, the 1 with Ordo Iuris). Understandably, working with a man associated with this peculiar organization (I devoted 2 walls of the text to her [and the only thing that grew old on average in the first was that it turned out that the kind who was in Ordo Iuris and was seconded to the Commission for the investigation of cases of paedophilia turned out to have GGCz, but at the time I wrote it, it was alternatively hard to presume it]), caused a abrupt reaction in the left-wing bubble.

The case is evident. The MP of the left-wing party, facing SLAPP, utilized the services of a lawyer who dealt with SLAPPAmi and was on this “bad” side. possibly not. It would seem that the case is evident, but the MP found rather a large group of defenders who explained in various ways why everything is fine. And it turned out that she had to usage Lewandowski's services, due to the fact that she needed people "serious and effective" (Wass he empathic with specified wisdom). If I were mean, I would compose that, fortunately for Polish activists, they were neither serious nor highly effective.

Others argued that the “extended train” was headed towards the MP, and any resented her for utilizing the services of individual who had “other views”. Like srsly, you could usage another firm's bullshit. But Lewandowski got it pro bono, and moving a case like this could cost $30,000. I'll be honest with you, I consulted my lawyer friends on this, and they agreed that if anyone wanted to, they could pay 30 grand for specified a case, but he would gotta effort to find specified an costly money exchange. The same lawyers said that a law firm frequently takes specified pro bono cases due to the fact that they can advance themselves with them.

There were besides arguments that possibly this gentleman is not very good, and possibly the Ordinists are bad, but the crucial thing is that the case was won. At this point I would like to have a cap: ALMOST all LEGALITY WOULD BE IN A DEAL OF THE CASE JUST WELL (I wrote "almost", due to the fact that it can't be excluded that individual would just pour a smoke and neglect to make time with the papers to court).

There were besides arguments which, in my opinion, are the manifestation of utmost partisanism. In another words, ‘because she is from the organization she votes for, I will defend her like independence’. As part of this kind of argument, it was possible to learn that Paulina Matysiak may have benefited from the aid of the Ordite, but after all, Tusk utilized Giertych's help. And besides, this Gierty guy did so bad by 2007 that the Ordinists were small mites. With all my dislike of Giertych (whose reluctance I expressed repeatedly, for I will never forget that he was 1 of the Reanimators of the All-Polish Youth), that is nonsense. Nonsense, which is very dangerous, due to the fact that to those who give specified wisdom escapes that in this way they trivialize the performance of the Ordinists. And to be honest, it was an outstanding accomplishment to play the "Giertych" card at the minute erstwhile people who defended themselves for years against the SLAPPs of the Ordinists spoke in the themes concerning Paulina Matysiak.

I would not have been myself if I had not noticed at this point that it is crucial that this associate has benefited from the services of a lawyer associated with an highly right-wing organization. due to the fact that it wasn't like it happened to Zandberg or Magda Biejat. No, it just hit Paulina Matysiak, who has a alternatively long past of making out with the right. all "piece" of this communicative should be disqualifying to the MP. And although Matysiak's adventure with the organization Together has come to an end (I learned this at the time of writing this layer of tectonic Review), however, the Joints should "do something" much earlier.

For it began with things seemingly trivial. Well, Matysiak started giving interviews to Karnowski brothers (who, by spiteful times, are called Kremlowski brothers). These media do not request to be presented to anyone, but never adequate to remind you that erstwhile a paper version of that organization body set itself as a point of honor to prove that “Anna Grodzka is simply a man”, even (note capslock) ZEMKIWICZ publically stated that this peculiar cover article has small to do with journalism. The chronicle work is to mention that Karnowski (i.e. their media) happened after Paulina Matysiak to drive (when the historical necessity called for them). Well, it's only a digression. So as not to prolong it: you don't go to these media and talk to them, amen.

Then there was the establishment of an association with Marcin Horala. And let me tell you, this was the minute I needed a good memory. Thanks to this memory, the information about the fact that in April 2022 the Left demanded the resignation of Marcin Horała from the position of Deputy Minister of Infrastructure. 1 of the faces of this peculiar press conference was (werble) Paulina Matysiak. And at that point, the organization together got a small worked up due to the fact that the MP did so “in her spare time” without consulting the organization beforehand. Paulina Matysiak was suspended (both in the left and in the organization Together), but in the end, nothing came of it. And it's significant. due to the fact that I realize that specified suspension is expected to be a signal to the MP/messenger to take care of. but Paulina Matysiak had it in her deep respect. On the “right side” there was more and more of it, and as a reward the organization Together at the end of the year 2024 suspended it (yes, I know, it was punished with reprimand, but it did not substance the least to her).

And you know, I realize that together, especially after leaving the fresh Left, each saber has meaning, but everything has its limits, or alternatively should have. As long as I could realize the motivation of the Totals, who decided not to throw it distant even though it was (note capslock) STRENGTHENED BY suspends, reprimands/etc. However, it was in March 2025 that she had to be thrown out of the party.

What happened in March? It happened that Paulina Matysiak voted in the Sejm in defence of Darius Matecki. The Sejm was to agree to his detention, and the associate felt that this was besides much. Then she explained it in specified a absurd way that it was possible to get the impression that the MP did not know what she was voting on (and I besides got the impression, for which I now gotta throw my head at the strips of the onions and admit to being a loser, due to the fact that she knew precisely what she was doing), due to the fact that she said (and unfortunately, this kind of argument will come back to us in this episode) that she voted in favour of waiving immunity, but for allowing arrest it was not, due to the fact that it was the court that should decide about it, not the Sejm. And all is well, but without the consent of the Sejm, the court “it can”. In my opinion, this peculiar vote was absolutely undefensible. There is no way to defend (with even a small rigCzu) the vote “for” by Matecki.

Just as there is no way to defend cooperation with the Ordinists. I wanted to compose at this point that "it was a drop that poured out the spell of bitterness", but this "drop" was the size of the waves that in the movie Interstellar were confused with the mountains. And this time the messenger didn't get distant with it. It is crucial that we had a double vote on this peculiar "cooperation" (or alternatively the reasons why it happened). Paulina Matysiak said it was all due to the fact that the organization didn't want to aid her. Maciej Koniecny said (in 1 of the interviews) that the organization wanted to aid its messenger, but this 1 was not curious in this help. It is actual that neither organization presented "paragons", but I am inclined to believe the Joints, due to the fact that I do not think that the left organization would leave its envoy to the SLAPPs.

In the same interview, essential said that in his opinion Paulina Matysiak "is already in a completely different place". And to be honest, I agree with that all the time. However, I would add that she has been in this "other place" for a long time, but her organization has tried hard not to see it.

Incidentally, MP Matysiak acted like a typical Polish politician. With specified views alternatively than another views, she should have catapulted herself long ago. Its political destiny has been determined practically since the minute erstwhile she made her cooperation with the Ordinists public. Maciej Nejny said in the course of the above mentioned interview that they are counting on her to go, but if she does not, they will aid her. And if we were dealing with individual who is an thought person, then after something like this, Matysiak would just go away.

Paulina Matysiak didn't do it, and absolutely everyone knew why. Well, she just wanted to be able to play a "victim" card after she was kicked out of the party. This happened, due to the fact that from her message we can read, among another things, that her erstwhile organization was sectarian (yes, it is not expressed directly, but there is simply a clear PDK). If that were the case and if it were actually the same (which unfortunately will inactive be in this episode) as sectarian, Paulina Matysiak would have left the organization no later than after the political matrimony with Marcin Horala.

On the another hand, how eclectic views Paulina Matysiak has have, let him attest that erstwhile Bogdan Rymanowski (who late promotes anti-scientific shuria) praised that he already has half a bubble of subs on YT, 1 of the people who congratulated him was Paulina Matysiak.

I know this thread has grown very much, but 1 more thing needs to be added rather important. After it turned out that the organization Together, however, no longer wanted Paulina Matysiak, the voices rose (many, nevertheless) that her expulsion was a harmful decision. As a substance of fact, I do not mean statements by people who have in their elonex bio MAGA, I love PiS, only Karol Nawrocki/etc., but any left-hand commentaries.

The argument looked something like this: thanks to her contacts and designation Paulina Matysiak attracted part of the right-wing electorate. And at this point, I'm going to admit 2 things. First of all, this is the minute erstwhile I had a longer pause in writing (or it came out somehow), and secondly, I cannot be annoyed by this kind of argument.

It just so happens that the left side rather rightly criticizes liberals for being constantly retreating from right-wing rhetoric. The thought is simple: if an utmost right organization makes any demands, then we will bargain them, and then people will choose us (because we are more civilized) and not any utmost right organization (because “everyone knows what they are). The only consequence of this kind of action is the ever-increasing support for the extremes, for those (when liberals take their narrations or postulates) say, "Do you see? We had a job, and they lied to you earlier." Nevertheless, liberals with stubbornness worthy of a better origin proceed to apply the same tactics.

And now it turns out that, according to any left-wing commentariat, a way to separate from the United Right, conf/etc. The electorate is to walk to right-wing media, to make out with right-wing environments and to usage right-wing rhetoric (damaged but nevertheless right-wing). So we have a barrel of libs who effort and fail, but we (left) are certain to succeed? That's a large argument. That's not very sensible.

About the minute I ended up harassing Mrs Matysiak, it turned out that this MP was trying to build around herself... that's right, you don't know what that is. Yeah, it's expected to be called "The Poli Team," but it's all known for this moment. I bet that "continuation" will depend on the consequence to this signal. Although there have already been voices that if the Poli squad appears in the polls "it will rapidly jump together and the Left" (yes, editor Rafał Woś wrote it for real) but the fact is that without the support of the right (because the left won't be able to grasp it) Paulina Matysiak will barely play "solo".

If Matysiak, so did the Couples, who this time did not mildly try. Well, in the vote of consent to detention and temporary detention for Ziobra, the Teams did not participate. And you know, I realize that the 2 of us want to stand out in the Seym/etc, but I don't think the right way to stand out is to be one, not another vote on Ziobra. due to the fact that this is Ziobro, the same 1 who owns all pathology associated with the achievements of Solidarne politicians (broken by “Sovereign”) of Poland. And it's not like you've voted 26 times before to waive immunity, so now you can blow the arrest vote. The translation “why we voted so much” was a small Matysiakowe. Maciek Koniecny said they don't want to make Ziobry a martyr. A separate issue is that after Zandberg's vote he was reminded of his words that his left hand would not tremble erstwhile a motion for a Court of State for the Ziobra was voted. And, yes, I know, it wasn't a vote on the Court of State, but the taste remained.

There were besides translations of Private Together Members, who explained that in full they had all counted well and knew that the proposal would pass even without the votes of their party. Mercy, organization together. It's a BLOOD. Wasn't there anyone there who thought it wasn't worth dying on that hill? Yes, I know that in Poland the institution of temporary detention was, is and will be abused, but this is not the case. In this case, we are dealing with the head of the organization from which 1 MP has fled to the Gulash Dictator before justice and asked for asylum there. The fact that this full bromander from turning the Justice Fund into a PR agency will effort to mess with us due to the fact that we heard and saw it (thanks to Mraz's recording studio).

Since we are already at the Justice Fund, we have had an interesting situation. Well, Stanislaw Tyszka said that he was in meetings with the Ziobra people and they said that, if anything, it could be promoted for this money. Since he mentioned Janusz Kowalski from his surname, he announced the submission of the AO (article 212 kk “denunciation”). And this is truly interesting, due to the fact that Tyszka said the same thing last May, and then someway Janusz Kowalski did not consider it appropriate to sue him. However, this was not the end of the matter, for Paul Kukiz (a once-party friend of Tyka spoke about it). Paul Kukiz said that he did not callback specified conversations, but immediately afterwards he dropped napalm on the Ziomrists and added that from 1 of Tyszek's meetings he came out moved clearly and said, "Let us go away, they are thieves." It is crucial that these words have passed without much echo. Interestingly, Kukiz didn't even get his hands off of his colleagues in the United Right.

As for my opinion on the subject (and it seems to me that if individual crosses my Text Walls, then specified a "my opinion" most likely expects) is that Kaczyński and his surroundings would most gladly get free of anchors in the form of Ziobrists (or at least those who are "burdened" by shafts associated with the Justice Fund). There they have adequate problems in PiSa with their “sailers”. Furthermore, the defence of the Ziomrists is hampered by the aforementioned recordings from Mraz. It is impossible to ignore the fact that the Grand Honourable associate of the Justice Fund talked to each another on recordings like a group of gangs (they were afraid that individual would “pull off”). People who have nothing to say to each another don't talk to each another that way.

Unfortunately, we cannot yet halt the carousel of laughter, due to the fact that the emergency brake was blocked by MP Maria Kurowska. someway it happened that Onet reached the email (a bit of it is coming from Pereiroza from the years 2015-2023, but we will get to it in a moment), which meant that the Kurowska MP, who should have nothing to do with how competitions under the Justice Fund were held, had much to do with it. Well, shock and disbelief that individual from Solidarno-Sovereign-Polish could do that, right? If it were all over, there most likely wouldn't be anything to compose about. but they're Ziobrists, so no 1 always owes anything there.

Although the associate herself did not first disown anything and argued all this so that, in fact, it was no wonder that she was afraid about the region whose inhabitants elected her to the Sejm, then individual told her that the problem was not that she cared about her region, but that it was done under the Justice Fund. So Kurowska went to counteroffensive and announced that she had not sent any emails. For this Kamil Dziubka revealed the header of the email that was sent from her seismic mailbox. Was that enough? No way. Maria Kurowska then stated that she could not send this peculiar e-mail, due to the fact that it was “out of public activity”. And then it turned out (Kamil Dziubka has recovered) that on the day she was "out of public activity" she participated in 81 votes. In the same message in which Kurowska claimed that she did not send an email, it happened that it was fabricated due to the fact that she remembered that she did not send it.

And you know, at first glance, it seems like any bullshit explanation from individual who just doesn't realize how the net works. but SuwPol knows that this email is real. SuwPol knows that this cannot be explained in any way by means of legitimate arguments. So they decided to go dark. Yes, we will not believe that, but this message is not directed at us. This message is addressed to this section The right-wing electorate has been unified, which will believe anything, in order to someway rationalize the continuous reports of subsequent ZP members. They just weren't there. There's a Żurkovite pursuit (I'm not going to halt playing this term) and manipulated emails to prove that buying fire trucks is something bad.

Besides, this could be an introduction to the defence strategy of Kurowska's lawyers (who will most likely be needed erstwhile the case reaches court). And here I will have a brief anecdote from my hometown. Well, we had 1 president in the City of Above Akwen for a couple of tenure, who, at the end of his “governments” had so much that in 2010 he ceased to be a prezie. due to all these terms he grew into humans, these people (dissatisfied with the changes) formed an association. On a 4th account belonging to the association, there were occasional grievances to the fresh city president. The same president went to court with this and the case seemed evident due to the fact that it was not possible to "reintepreserve" these villains in any way. And then it turned out that it was not known who did these entries, due to the fact that quite a few people/etcs had access to the computer at the association headquarters. This strategy proved effective (because as you can guess, no 1 confessed). I presume that in the case of a Kurovsk MP, the defence line may be the same. The messenger had assistants and they besides had access to her email account. Nevertheless, I believe that in this peculiar case this strategy will not work, due to the fact that these emails were rather well into what we already know about how the Ziobrists were dealing with the Justice Fund. The chronicle work is to mention that even any of the Agitation Accounts of the United Right have criticised this line of defence (among another things, John Bingham), so it is clear that the love for these circumstantial Ziomrists who origin problems of an image nature, besides much is lacking in the United Right.

So at the very end of the FS discussion 2 cases. First of all, I feel sick erstwhile I read sweats that show that the Ziobrists didn't do anything incorrect due to the fact that fire trucks are needed. Well, you know, since there's 1 budget, it doesn't truly substance what pocket of this budget we're going to take the money from, since that's how the firemen get their cars. but it's first water populism. Because, yes, no 1 would head the firemen getting fresh cars, but the key to that was that the Justice Fund had a somewhat different purpose. Of course, it did not substance at all, due to the fact that the United Right so charmed with the rules that it turned out that under the "anti-crime" everything could be attached. Besides, somehow, all those cars/etcs. They were distributed where the SuwPolows hoped for parliamentary tickets. At this point, could individual say, ‘ Does this indicate that the Ziobrists say not all Fire Department units deserve fresh cars? ’ I can't answer that question due to the fact that I'm not a Ziobrist.

All right, but how precisely did Onet get to the documents? If I were malicious, I would call it “Pereriosis” (not at all related to the name of a organization media employee). It just so happens that the mechanics by which the media “earned” papers (read: individual provided them with access to them) was excellent during the regulation of the United Right. I mention this, of course, due to the fact that at times it is similar. Although it must be admitted that, unlike what it looked like between 2015 and 1923, these actions are now somewhat better thought out.

Let me put it another way. During the regulation of the United Right, it was that if the prosecutors were going to press charges or a case was getting started, then all government and pro-government media were getting bored. Now it looks like the information's going "shoe". A perfect example is what was done at the very beginning of the “drinking” of what was able to evidence the Mraz Recording Studio (to be precise, it will be a summary, due to the fact that even if I wanted to describe it all on the heads, it would most likely be the nasty pages). The mechanics looked like this. any part of the recordings were published, indicating that “it is burning” with this Justice Fund. In consequence to this inflection, the Ziobrists (supported by the United Right), who rapidly constructed any defensive narratives, immediately launched. The answer to these defensive narratives was to throw in further passages that indicated that these narratives were lies. The reaction of the Ziomrists was the same as the erstwhile time: further defensive narratives were fired, which were then "confused" by subsequent recordings. Now it was akin with Maria Kurowska.

And I will admit honestly that I have a dilemma about how to handle this. On the 1 hand, these are Ziebra standards. On the another hand, I realise that the public debate in Poland is now in specified excellent form that there may be no another option. Let us imagine that after it started to get hot around the Justice Fund it was not decided to make any recordings public. What would a dominant communicative be? Well, possibly there was something incorrect there, but the Ziobrists changed the law, so it was all lege artis, and besides, it was about fire trucks, so possibly that's how this fresh power would deal with governance, not looking for a gap all over. Only due to the fact that these recordings were made public – we know that this squad "set a statement" and was afraid that any decisions might neglect to be defended (that there was talk about setting contests there is no request to mention because, as the classical utilized to say, it is obvious). So possibly there is no escape from Pereiroza due to the fact that Pereiroza marked us all.

NOTE, VERY UNCYCLE HEAT REVIEWS SPONSORATED BY SUWEREN!

https://patronite.pl/Piknik-on-country-g%C5%82upoty

The chronicle work to mention that it invariably annoys me that the prosecution counts fakapas, conducting “Ziobrist” proceedings. There is no excuse for what happened to Romanowski erstwhile it turned out that the prosecution knew that he had 2 immunity idols, but she thought that the second did not apply “because of the legal expertise.” Only thanks to this could Romanowski escape to Hungary. Now, in turn, the prosecutor's office applied for the alleged "compulsory hypocrisy" to be entered in the perpetual book of Zbigniew Ziobra's home in Jeruzal (okay, or am I the only 1 associated with "Jaruzel" all time?) and it turned out that the court refused to compose this mortgage due to the fact that there were many errors in the application. You know, it's not like you can afford to make mistakes in little "medial" matters, but I don't think you're going to argue with me erstwhile I compose that you shouldn't make mistakes in any case, and in cases that are so polarizing, you shouldn't make mistakes even more, due to the fact that each of these mistakes will be fuel for defending ziobrys. I wouldn't want to be misunderstood, but YOU HAD 1 JOB, PROCURATURO.

Now we can go to Donald Tusk, who someway happened to be criticizing the European Charter of Human Rights and saying that if it is not possible to change it, it may be rather reasonable to pronounce it. The day after these words were spoken, the spokesperson of the government assured that this message did not mention to Poland. First, if it were not for the context, it would be comic that with any statements by Donald Tusk it is practically the same as with statements by Jarosław Kaczyński, who first says something that his hard electorate wants to hear, and after a while the translation (this time directed for normals) that the president actually meant something different than everyone understood.

And I realize that the ECHR was created at a time erstwhile no 1 dreamed that 1 country would be able to exert migratory force on another. I realize that she was born in a time when, for example, no 1 thought about what would happen erstwhile a state that would want to deport people who do not have the right to asylum would "retaliate" from the country where they came from, for that country will not be peculiarly curious in receiving them back. And I would have been able to mention here, point by point, that "what did not even dream of the authors" of this document, but the answer to that cannot be the denunciation of this convention. And if individual after 8 years of the regulation of the United Right has any doubts about this, then seemingly they request another eight.

It is worth remembering that specified statements are not in vain. It is not that Donald Tusk can say specified things to himself and no 1 pays attention to it due to the fact that I am able to presume about the Justice Fund, that the United Right is watching this very closely and monitoring the reactions. If it turned out that the majority of Poles would be in favour of mixing with this EKPCz, why, why should the United Right not effort it? The communicative pad would be: “Well, even if Donald Tusk spoke about this convention in specified a way, and not in another way, it is something, isn’t it?” Yes, I know, requiring Polish politicians to consider whether what they say will have no negative consequences, it is on my part a far-reaching exaggeration and most likely the effect of being an unreformable left.

The fact that I am an unreformable leftist most likely besides shows that I am not inclined to believe that a organization MP whose name rhymes with the word "collaboration" (as in the case of the MP who did not bow to the Ikean cashier) was actually "lost". The argument goes more or little as Jacek Nizinkiewicz wrote on Eloneks: “Well, this MP is neither his brother nor his matchmaker, but it is hard to believe that he wanted to bargain any items from the store, due to the fact that he would hazard his career for a fewer 100 gold, so let us not make him a thief.” And I will honestly admit to you that unless I am amazed that the conflict itself and its online opinions (which, for example, all event related to the war in Ukraine is being spread out to atoms, in order to be able to "provide" that the media are manipulating, and that the Ukrainians themselves are guilty of it anyway), they were practically not curious in this matter, and erstwhile they have already begun to be curious in it, it was only to defend their MP that I was amazed by the "understanding over divisions" that in fact this associate did not want to do anything wrong.

For the sake of the non-existent transcendental existence, how did this associate "risk his career"? Did his political career end after that? Has the confederacy fallen? After that, did the confeve fire this MP? Or did she say she wouldn't get a place on the list? The answer to these questions is “I know, so I don’t gotta guess that I don’t”.

Behavior of rather quite a few commentators is pure water loser. Yeah, well, everyone knows that the confa is constantly scouting and checking out what she can afford. This besides applies to the strict dimension of information (actually, in the case of conflict, it is alternatively a disinformation dimension), due to the fact that the confiers are practically constantly lying (and the said MP has a very long past of erasing his entries for this reason). However, erstwhile a associate of this formation is caught in the act of attempted theft, it abruptly turns out that we should believe in the assurance of the associate and his formation.

It's just that the guy was buying large and he didn't delete everything due to the fact that he had headphones and he didn't announcement it wasn't loaded. It is simply a pity that it has not been added that “whoever has never done specified a thing, let him throw the first stone”, due to the fact that the post offices of the confederates would be buried by tons of stones, but it is only a digression. I would be inclined to believe this version of events if it were found that a confederate associate was buying for the first time in his life, and he was in the incorrect place for self-service money.

I realize that you can be distracted and you can not delete, for example, any small part of crap, how you do large shopping, but I will not believe that erstwhile you do any large shopping, you could first miss the fact that a bunch of articles did not "retaliate" and, secondly, do not pay attention to the fact that erstwhile you pay a small bit the price does not agree. I will besides not believe that if it were actually OLBRZYZYMY BUYS, it would not be possible to deal with the service and simply pay for these articles. And that's actually an interesting thing, due to the fact that it was only erstwhile I wrote those words that I noticed something that I had previously (while on the occasion of the podcast episode in which we were leaning over this subject) escaped. I'm just explaining. Well, it came to me, my esteemed readers, that this unfortunate (although mainly our national misfortune) MP paid for these articles (except for the adoption of the mandate, of course). It turned out that he accepted the ticket, but did not pay for the articles. So it wasn't until the police arrived that they weren't needed? And at the very end of this subject, one, small, attention. Why was this associate actually detained by the service? While in this peculiar store the service does not do “simple checks” (preliminaries, I had to), I think there was something about it, and I don't think we had to deal with “simple”. By the way, I was peculiarly amused by Mentzen's emphasis on the fact that this associate accepted the mandate and did not cover himself with immunity. His Lordship is besides gracious.

All right, I admit that I have devoted so much space to the erstwhile subject due to the fact that now we are moving on to the penultimate topic, which is by no means ridiculous (even involuntary). You know, I co-authored a book about Polish fans of Trump (about the title of selfexplanators: “Trumpolacy”) and we were there producing together with the Reports from Putinowska Poland (I do not tag his poja, due to the fact that the algorithm will become worse) about what “it can be”, if Trump manages to win the election. We produced (in peculiar me) about the large Love of the United Right to Donald Trump. Nevertheless, I will admit to you honestly that I am devastated by how much Kaczyński's organization mistreats Trump no substance how bad and unfavourable decisions and plans of his administration are for our country.

Recently, for example, the fresh US safety strategy has become public. The point of this telegraphic summary is that any relation between the US and the "external world" is to be practically purely financial. Let me put it another way: if any country wants to have a good relation with the United States, then specified a country will gotta spend on these relations.

For the record, I did not have besides much love for the United States (I do not want and will not have), but I was aware that regardless of my feelings in this matter, the United States is simply a warrant of our safety. Not the only one, of course, but the main one. With respect to the U.S. achievements so far, the fact is that Russia could easy build a communicative (used very willingly by our national sock-sceptics) that went something like this: "Aha, so the United States is allowed to attack another countries and we are not allowed to? And that is justice?!” Nevertheless. Poland (and practically all of Europe) could number on the fact that in case of something (read: if Russia had seen that it had changed) The USA (Poland broken by Europe [no, I do not number Russia as Europe]) will aid us. And to be honest, it could have been certain even at a time erstwhile the Obama administration tried to bring about a reset in relations with Russia. Besides, it seems to me that adequate evidence to support this thesis is that no Western European country (and that is us for Russia, for example) "Second Army in the World" has dropped bombs on its heads. In summary, it was known how, but stable.

Well, now it's much worse than knowing-how, but unstable. due to the fact that at first glance, it all looks better now than in past times, due to the fact that if we have economical ties, then Donald “Deal Maker” Trump will not leave us to the Russian bombs and Second Army in Ukraine, which would be pleased to carry out various equipment from our homes (washers, toilets, consoles and mostly everything that is not firmly attached to the ground). At least they're trying to convince us of our beloved Trumpomaci.

Except it's just bullshit. Well, it just so happens that if you're going out with any large "deal maker" who puts above everything an (very primitive) economical account, then it may turn out that individual who wants to do you a bad deal will buy more bululators from the deal-maker than you and this richer buyer will sneak into the grace of the large Bulbulator Vendor. And erstwhile he sneaks into those favors, it may turn out that all your deals with WSB are no longer valid, due to the fact that he figured he's not getting along with you anymore. As a substance of fact, I am not even curious in this Russia (although it would have much more to offer the US than we [even J.D. Vance has already told us that Russia has different natural resources/etc. and I don't think he just wanted to brag about his knowledge]), but that given the optics of the current U.S. administration – richer countries will agree with them more quickly. It just so happens that Poland is already (unless?) in G20, but there are rather quite a few another countries ahead, which have a much lower number with the letter ‘G’.

It follows from this that Michał Dworczyk, who in the baaaardzo long thread on Eloneks explained that this fresh strategy is even better for us than what was before, most likely does not realize that he fell into wishful thinking. But, Dworczyk and his wishful reasoning is 1 thing, but what Radosław Fogiel did, it is already playing the handrail at sublight speed.

What did Fogiel say? He mentioned, among another things, that in this strategy this is something that thanks to it (notice quotes): "Russia will accomplish specified a level of stableness that it will not endanger its European neighbours". due to the fact that you know, it's adequate to bring Russia into economical relations so that Russia understands that it's not worth fighting and starting conflicts, due to the fact that that will mean serious economical consequences. The same people will explain to us that Russia's current actions are the effect of the Obama reset, the second of the actions of Germany (which, I recall, tried to affect Russia in economic/etc/etc relations. [you will not guess whose German organization said the same thing a fewer months ago and why it is about Thomas Frolich of AfD] and mostly treating Russia as a average partner in global relations, and sometimes even giving in to it.

Incidentally, I do not want to defend Obama's administration, but at that time Russia was sending signals (now we know that they were false) which could be interpreted so that Russia could be dealt with and that average relations could be conducted with it. Now the politicians of the right (notice will be capslock): KNOWING THIS ALL AND REMEMBERING THIS, WHAT THE RESET ENCOURAGES THAT THIS TIME will surely succeed. Why would they say that? Well, they're even afraid to think against Donald Trump, for reasons I believe obvious. To say they don't give a crap about our country is to say nothing.

And if individual reading (or watching) Fogla's words thought that "more cannot be done," then specified a individual would be wrong, for then, all of a sudden, Rafal Woś, who fell into the rabbit gap much deeper than Fogel and Dworczyk, took together. As was the case with the United Right, Rafał Woś besides had to make a text in defence of this fresh strategy. The difference between him and those erstwhile ancymons is that Rafał Woś went 1 step further and started praising NATO's unexpandedness. Let me quote the full passage, but I loyally inform you that it should be read by an open window:

"Ending the feeling that NATO is an alliance that must constantly expand" - many of these quotes can worry at first. But does it truly increase our Polish safety to join the Alliance of successive countries of the erstwhile USSR? Or does it lead to escalation in relations with Russia and endanger to bring into NATO countries whose loyalty may prove problematic at the time of the trial?"

First, let's take a look at the very end of this beautiful passage. In my opinion, a akin argument could have come from all the colours of the Rafał Wosów, who were surviving in NATO-member countries on the eve of Poland's accession to NATO. I mean, is it reasonable to welcome the countries of the erstwhile Warsaw Pact into NATO, whose loyalty may prove problematic at the time of the attempt?

Secondly, "whether the admission to the Alliance of subsequent countries of the erstwhile USSR truly increases our Polish security" (so that we have no doubts, this is about Ukraine), I will let myself to re-use the capslock; SO MORE. The more NATO countries we are from Russia, the better it should be for us and everyone who wants to talk about Polish security. Incidentally, if it were not for context, it would be comic that Woś is produced about “the erstwhile USSR countries” by undermining their possible loyalty, but someway it does not mention that “in the minute of trial” much greater loyalty problem would have been the Orbanian Hungary. Well, Orban's MEGA too, so he's no good to criticize.

Third, remember that we cannot extend this NATO besides much due to the fact that it will annoy Russia. I've already utilized the Wosa argument in countries that kind of took us to NATO, so now it's time for another. It's good that Rafał Woś pays attention to the feelings of others. It is simply a pity that they are Russia's feelings. The widows don't care that possibly the "former USSR countries" would want to join NATO due to the fact that they know what it will do to be at the mercy of Russia. Besides, I don't want to be malicious, but it seems to me that since Russia attacked NATO Ukraine it has grown and even though today's Woś would call it an "escalation", this escalation has not led to anything (as well as the crossing of further impossible borders, after the Russia was expected to "show us all"). I may be prejudiced, but I don't give a crap about Russia's feelings about NATO expansion.

So to the very end of these ostrategic considerations. The problem is that even if there is simply a change of administration in the US in a fewer years and the fresh administration says that this Trump strategy is no longer in force, it will be besides late. I mean, it'll be possible to undo harmful decisions and fix transatlantic relationships, but that's not going to change what happened in a broader perspective. I'm just explaining. I will do this on the example of what the Law and Justice did to the Constitutional Tribunal. Well, the Law and Justice was the first organization to show that it was possible to wipe out a known part of the body with the Constitutional Court's ruling, and there is absolutely nothing there. Then the Law and Justice didn't gotta worry about it anymore due to the fact that he took over TK. And now any of the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal do not care about the PO (because it rightly treats the Constitutional Tribunal as a Pisowska outbuilding). Even if there is simply a constitutional reset, and all parties agree that the deficiency of a systemic fuse is not good and the full situation is patched up, it will not result, for example, a fewer years after specified a "reset" will come any another More Law and will not again wipe out a known part of the body with decisions of the Constitutional Court.

Transatlantic relations are similar. The fresh administration can fix it, but it cannot warrant that it will not be followed by More Trump, who will again want to implement the strategy "my rich first homies".

And that's where I'd like to end, but I request to bend over 1 more subject. Interestingly, this subject has been discussed twice by me. First time in 2013, second time in 2017. In order for the tradition to be done, I should give a separate note to it, but given my “delays”, I most likely would not have written it in the end. But, ad meritum, the thought is to introduce a uniform price for fresh books.

My opinion on this has not changed, and I find it a very bad idea. While the specified effort to regulate what is happening on the book marketplace (how large players treat the smaller ones/etc.) I consider it a good thing, I consider it a very bad solution to effort to concrete the price of fresh books, due to the fact that the last thing we request is for the book to become a luxury good.

Perhaps otherwise: if the introduction of a uniform book price is combined with the fact that cover book prices will not match those of today, then specified a change has a chance to not end badly. However, if today's cover prices do not change and we (as readers) are "indicted" to buy fresh books at cover prices, then I am not any large Analyst, but after what I finished jumping from zero VAT to 5% books, I think it will end with a hecatomb on the marketplace of a fresh book (if individual is curious about what it looked like earlier, then erstwhile I wrote a 2013 note I managed to scope the data on sales of books and the post-VAT phase was very visible).

Let me describe 1 kei. There is simply a trilogy of “History of Communism in the World” (which has its drawbacks, but I am not about it now). The first volume ("Kaci") was released in 2021 and its cover price was PLN 99.90 (I bought it "fresh" for PLN 69, if I waited, it would most likely be possible to buy it for half the price). The second volume was issued in 2023 at a cover price of 129,90. The another volume I bought for PLN 65 (using 1 of the farts of loyalty programs). The 3rd volume ("Company") was issued this year and has a cover price of 159.90 (it can now be accessed for about 100 PLN). In another words, in 4 years, the book cover price (they have a very close volume) increased by pi times the eye 60%.

And I know that the calculation most likely goes like this: if individual spends (I will be gracious) e.g. 800 PLN per year on fresh books, then after the introduction of a uniform price the book will spend the same amount of books, but simply buy less fresh books. And this small item is completely omitted here, that if we "freeze" the cover price today, then in the case of the abovementioned "History of Communism in the World" this would mean that the 3rd volume would cost almost 100 PLN more than the second one. Am I the only 1 who thinks there's a large difference? Yes, I know that not only historical books are sold in Poland, but the difference in price will most likely be proportional. This difference can lead to a situation where any readers will “borrow” books from different portals (in the form of an ebook) or buy them with an yearly hold (i.e. erstwhile prices are already much more affordable due to promotions). And then people curious in the book marketplace not to change anything (and large players can proceed to do what they are doing now) will most likely come up with quite a few voices that will indicate that all the changes made are incorrect and you gotta undo them due to the fact that you see what is happening in the “new” book market, who saw it.