Grabbing debate: If you are invited to a restaurant, we pay

news.5v.pl 2 months ago

Head of KPRM Jan Grabić tried to explain on ZET Radio the controversy surrounding the financing of TVP's debate in liquidation in Konski. “When we invitation you to the restaurant, we pay. (...) I think that any of the accounts from TVP have been settled," said Mr KO. Minister of athletics and Tourism Sławomir Nitras besides referred to the debate in Koński and many questions around it. He, like the head of KPRM, assured solemnly that all the costs of organising this debate would be covered all penny by Rafał Trzaskowski's staff.

Grabić answered the question of Bogdan Rymanowski whether the prosecution should look at the debate in Koński. Of course, he unilaterally stated that it was the independent media and the Law and Justice who were liable for pushing ahead with the debate.

I think this attack by the PiS activists, the Republic, on the scene of the debate, should be investigated by the police and prosecutors

“He assessed.

Financing

Jan Grabić besides tried to explain issues related to the financing of the debate in Koński and raised allegations that Trzaskowski's staff had organised his own election event via TVP in liquidation. He pointed out that in this respect everything is clear and that night did not happen, which would be contrary to Polish law.

We're not afraid. The charge is absurd. The debate in Koński, and Rafał Trzaskowski invited it, according to this custom, erstwhile individual invites to the restaurant, he pays and the election committee of Rafał Trzaskowski covered all costs

— explained Grabic.

Rymanowski noted that he is not certain whether the comparison of TVP in liquidation to the restaurant is appropriate and whether it is definitely Rafał Trzaskowski's restaurant.

Not TVP. It's a horse room. We were not on Polish Television. We paid for production.

— he tried to convince Grabic.

In his opinion, the bills relating to the organisation of the debate in Koński are collected gradually, consisting of security, cleaning of the building or tv implementation.

There were any deals, invoices, those were the arrangements. There's nothing special.

“ He listed the coalition policy.

Of course, it became much more golden and resonant erstwhile it had to hit Karol Nawrocki. Apparently, however, he does not realize the basic difference between public media and a private station.

If we were malicious, we would ask whether Mr Nawrocki's committee is paying for yesterday's debate in the Republic. The Republic is associated with the PiS staff, but they are 2 separate institutions. Did Mr. Nawrocki pay for the transmission?

– asked Grabic.

The head of the NRP besides added that the outrage of the talker of the Sejm Simon Holown in the context of this case is unjustified.

I realize the annoyance of Marshal Holownia, it's a campaign, it's an emotion, but if we look at the facts, there's no grounds for outrage. He proposed one-on-one debate to Mr Mentzen himself. And what, the marshal would anticipate TVP not to broadcast it? How does Marshal Hołownia organise a debate 1 on 1 is ok and TVP is expected to broadcast it, and as Rafał Trzaskowski responded to the invitation of Mr Nawrocki, then TVP is not expected to broadcast it?

— Grabić keyed, adding that there is simply quite a few “hypocrisy” in this regard.

KO accounts

Minister of athletics and Tourism Sławomir Nitras besides referred to the debate in Koński and many questions around it. He, like the head of KPRM, assured solemnly that all the costs of organising this debate would be covered all penny by Rafał Trzaskowski's staff.

We did it all by law. We are the only committee that has always had appropriate reports over the past 30 years, and I am calming down, and I think that you may inactive be, I have seen any overexcited, overexcited PiS Members there, they may inactive be amazed at the results of this audit.

said Sławomir Nitras.

If you hear any policy of the Law and Justice that lies about it. All the costs of organising this task will be borne, due to the fact that they are inactive under way, will be borne by the electoral committee of Rafał Trzaskowski

— supplemented.

A longing for a media monopoly

Sławomir Nitras besides could not get over the fact that the debate of presidential candidates could have taken place outside TVP in liquidation. He attacked PiS and Jarosław Kaczyński for allegedly building his own private tv in the form of the Republic television.

What is inequality? On the fact that they stole public money in the presidential and parliamentary run and present bear the consequences

He said.

Republic? This is the richest tv today, and who does it belong to? To Jarosław Kaczyński

“Nitras assessed.

According to Sławomir Nitras, the largest opposition party, whose backing was unlawfully taken from public funds, is the richest group in Poland.

PiS is the richest organization in Poland today, due to the fact that it has accumulated so much, "stealed" resources to the Republic, among others, for 8 years of its rule, that present specified commercial stations as RMF could envy the financial situation of the Republic

He stressed.

In his opinion, “a real debate: it was held in Koński and was organised by TVP in liquidation.

The real debate was on Friday, and that 1 was truly real emotional, and here it was, this country in this thing called the Republic, they wanted to prove at all costs that it would be polite, nice.

“The Minister of athletics and Tourism concluded.

What neo-TVP mission?

It is worth noting that Mr Marek Markiewicz assessed yesterday in a conversation with the portal inPoliticy.pl that the situation does not look as simple and clear as the politicians of KO seem to present.

Public tv is not a box where another committees can throw whatever they like

“Markiewicz said.

The erstwhile head of the KRRiT enumerated provisions that could have been infringed in connection with TVP's participation in the debate organised by the election staff of Rafał Trzaskowski.

I realize that this broadcasting time was bought and paid for, although I would wonder if, under specified conditions, tv has the right to have specified a debate, due to the fact that this debate has been treated as an advertising product, and this is not consistent with either the constitution or the Broadcasting Act

“Markiewicz said.