You think you know everything about Moscow's negotiating position for peace talks? Just in case. Well, before the Russians agree to take a seat behind the negotiating table, we request to decision out the chairs prepared for Europeans. We must be withdrawn not only from the negotiation but besides from any warrant of peace. Why? due to the fact that present the European Union ranks second (after Ukraine) in Putin's hatred ranking and his talker – Medvedev. Why not Poland, Lithuania or NATO?
The North Atlantic Alliance is indeed the enemy of sui generis, but the enemy, I would say, combated cold, unaffected; with military precision, utilizing combat technology, in all available spaces, under the threshold of open war. It's an enemy entered in Russian-Soviet DNA. How deep? It is adequate to remind you that before Russian aggression in 2014, the vast majority of Ukrainians considered NATO an enemy! While they wanted integration with the EU, they spoke the language of homo sovieticus about the military alliance. Today, the same Ukrainians seem incredible and absurd at the same time.
Here we stumble over another paradox; also, in a sense, russian prowess. The strength of the communist empire was the klozungi, or password – sometimes with a response. Here is an example: “I say Lenin – I think party”. Or the another way around. What is it? The point is that the communist task did not have (against the claims of Marxist philosophers) a technological insignium, but strictly – religious. He had his gods and saints (changed in the wisdom of stages), for he could be accepted only for faith. There was a dogma according to which a man may be wrong, but a party—never. Like, without trying on, the All-Father. Thus, erstwhile the leader of the Petersburg coup (undeservedly called the October Revolution) is (was) aligned with the party, it is (was) infallible. God's attributes make us soak his unfortunate corpse in formalin and present to the faithful as relics.
The North Atlantic Alliance's criminality was besides accepted for faith, but the propaganda message was mostly Washington. "I say NATO – I think USA". due to the fact that only through American hegemony is the combat formation of northern democracies treated with respect. It's not an admiracy, it's respect in the face of strength. From him comes the Kremlin's belief that it is adequate to deal with the Yankees, and NATO will lose its confrontational attributes. Any attributes, due to the fact that European Allies, without US Army support, will stay an easy target. So let us go back to “near abroad”, like the Crematorian political technologists utilized to describe the Russian area of delusional influence.
The European association of free states reproduces the strength of the smallest associate State. The consequence of the lonely Baltics to aggression, whether economical or cognitive, The Kremlin wouldn't care. Imagine: Tallinn prohibits Russians from entering Estonia (minorly larger than the Mazovia province). There'd be no end to ridicule and manhood. Not just Moscow. Everywhere. Atoli repons Brussels, representing 27 members, almost the full of Europe, has a different species weight.
The European Union is an empire. But the empire, which the fresh territories "obtain" not by conquest, but by the promise of security, quality of life and prosperity (i.e. deficit goods in the Russian Federation), however, besides sets conditions for candidates to participate, evaluates them according to strict moral, political, legal and economical criteria. European integration is simply a win-win operation. Old members gain fresh markets and a region of decay, or areas of predictability (imaine the ongoing division of Germany with Russian tanks on the Elbe!) and fresh ones – guarantees of the escalationr to prosperity and protection of civilian rights. It's roughly.
Atoli Putin's attitude to an integrated Europe needs an erata. From the very beginning, erstwhile he humbled himself on the Kremlin throne, spreading the aura of an iron politician and a global friend of humans and animals, he could not hide the natural hatred of European Community architecture. He loathed it, considering it as a "gay-Jewish project" and as a "liberal totalitarianism aimed at sowing transhumanism", although these epithets were only the cover of a strategical diagnosis. And it was: a continent speaking with 1 voice is simply a threat, though it cannot be a partner to the Tsar, due to the fact that it is besides losing space to interact with the vile Roman rule of divide et impera. The partner for the Tsar can only be another Tsar, not an imaginary community. The nonsubjective is so clear; to make certain that the EU drowns in disputes; helpless against the recidivism of nationalisms.
After all, it is Russia that was created to be the arbitrator of the dispute between Luxembourg and Monaco. Consider: Luxembourg has a battalion (900 soldiers) of volunteer enlistment infantry. And he has the right to vote for the atomic power policy? Not gonna happen! Stalin had already cheered up his clowns during the libation in the Kunceva cottage with the question "how many divisions the Pope has had".
Why was Putin flying to Berlusconi for bunga-bunga dance parties? Why did he accept the Queen Marine Le Pen (like honours, unfortunately, she besides experienced in Poland) and finance her dreams of power? Why did he corrupt Chancellor Gerhard Schröder? Why did he dance with Karin Kneissl, the Austrian abroad Minister, at her wedding? due to the fact that they were all questioning the thought of European unity. Why did he yet give alternate für Deutschland thousands of offensive posts from false accounts during his last run to the Bundestag? due to the fact that most AfD members trust the Kremlin. due to the fact that the organization promised that it would be a "bridge between Trump and Putin", whatever specified an argument would mean. Finally, it effectively reactivates in the German psyche this etiological origin liable for the guilt towards Russia, but besides a circumstantial fascination with the power from which they experienced the top apocalypse in history.
In the meantime, let us return to the conditions for ending the invasion of Ukraine according to the Russian arbitrator. The cremel prinypium is: without full abolition of sanctions, there will not even be any discussion of stopping the fire. NATO members must commit not to operate outside their borders. The peacekeepers are to be Russians and Americans who will aid demilitarize Ukraine. A joint Russian-American commission will take control of the country. Atoli is excluded from the presence of abroad troops (except Russian mirrators, of course) in Ukrainian territory. The USAF could only aid defender airspace and defend Russian refineries from attacks.
Ukrainian soldiers from the Donetsk Oblast are shelling the D-20 artillery towards Torecka, Ukraine, 24 July 2025.
And then there will come a time of “denasification” of Ukraine, that is, “rejecting authoritative nationalist ideology, eliminating its spreading organizations, banning propaganda hostile to Russia”. Ukraine must not pose threats at the level of identity and history, as part of the mental-cognitive war. Is that clear? If so, it remains the answer to the question of why Putin (analogically to Europe) does not effort to share Americans, talking separately with Texas, California, Colorado, Tennessee or Florida. 1 consequence is that national spending has accounted for about 23% of the overall US budget in fresh years, and the EU's Community money represents only 1% of associate States' income. That is why Washington can set up a unitary army, and Brussels can only afford seminars to consider options for building European armed forces.
Putin saw that Donald Trump besides divides the political globe into strong and weak countries. He congratulated the London brexit. Why? due to the fact that negotiations with a strong alliance of the weak are besides onerous to him. He takes Xi Jinping and Putin as equal, and during his first word besides Kim Jong Un, due to the fact that he has large rockets and atomic warheads. Yes, Joe Biden besides played in rivalry between the powers, but his approach was strategical and NATO was an argument, not a goal.
Russia has played the function of an arbitrator with global aspirations for 300 years. The doctrine, in which powers have the right to veto against the democratic elections of citizens of tiny states, is indeed an imperial foundation. There is only 1 identity difference between the USSR and the Russian Federation today. It is simply a phase design; ongisz red banners, and present – gieorgievka, a ribbon on which the Order of St. George hangs, since 1769 presented by the Tsars to Russian heroes. That the designation of the fall of the USSR as the top tragedy of the 20th century contradicts the burning of candles in the churches which the russian apparatus destroyed? Nope. They're just props.
Alexander Gauland, MP for the Bundestag, believes that “there is peace in Europe erstwhile relations between Germany and Russia are good. This tradition dates back to Napoleonic Wars and Chancellor Otto Bismarck's politics." Gauland's hometown, Chemnitz, was named Karl-Marx-Stadt from 1953 to 1990, which explains a lot. The communist authorities of the GDR considered themselves to be a Prussian russian forpost.
The European return of Russia was made by Piotr I (Great), who ended Sweden's dominance, strengthened Prussia and gained access to the Baltic. The effects of the 3rd Northern War, thanks to which the Tsar gained the position of European arbitrator in 1721, were disastrous for the Republic. A ruined country, a failure of the position of the European power, a deep political and economical crisis resulting in dependence on Russia.
It was at that time that the hosts of useful idiots weakened kingly power were revealed thanks to the Veto Liberal and leading noble anarchy to the threshold of betrayal. Stanislaw Cat-Mackiewicz defined 3 phantoms that sucked out the state life from Poland: "They were born sisters – the bar confederation, Radom and Targowice". The consequence of the long demolition was to mention the Republic to 3 arbitrations in 1772, 1793 and 1795. The president of the global Court of Justice and Peace was Catherine II (Great). Behind the bench were Frederick Wilhelm II and Leopold II of Habsburg. Stanislaw August Poniatowski was a protolo. Thanks to their verdict, Poles came across fresh ideas and values, and science, culture and textile were flourishing.
Following Napoleon's exile, the Habsburgs in 1815 invited crowned heads to Vienna for a power performance to supply Europe with eternal peace, insurance against revolutions and inviolability of borders. The concept of "power intervention" was introduced into the diplomatic dictionary (which Brezhnev converted 150 years later into a doctrine of "limited sovereignty"). The commandant of the European gendarmerie was appointed Tsar Nicholas I, who effectively protected order and security, suppressing subsequent fucks: the emergence of the Decabrists (1825), the November uprising (1831) and the Hungarian Revolution (1849).
In the summertime of 1939, the Russian-German tribunal ruled that in order to preserve European peace, it was essential to organize the “zone of mess”, the 4th division of the “Versal bastard”. Further arbitrations and concerts were held in Tehran, Yalta and Potsdam. While guarding social harmony and political balance, Moscow had to justice disputes in Berlin (1953), Budapest (1956) and Prague (1968). In negotiations resulting from the Protocols of Minsk I and Minsk II, Moscow was not a organization to the conflict either, but a mediator in the "housewar" on equal terms with France and Germany. In Alaska, Moscow's supervision proposed the establishment of a bilateral tribunal on Ukraine, due to the fact that it is easier to issue a verdict in chamber music than a symphony orchestra.
Is there any chance that the Moscow mediator will definitely disengage from the European tribunal? Small. While the low light in the tunnel does not announce the coming locomotive of history, it shines the thought of Sergei Karaganov, prominent advisor to Yelcin and Putin, guru of Russian political technologists. “ Russia’s journey of 3 years is over, ” he asks. It's time to take care of the return home to the origin of our past as a large power. And they are in Siberia." fresh Russia with its capital in Tobolsk is to cultivate "a unique cultural, cultural and spiritual openness inherited from the Genghis Khan empire".
An eminent political scientist sincerely (on the frontier of expiation) diagnoses that all the evil in Russia was due to the fact that “for 3 100 years we have forgotten the oriental roots of our country and people.” In fact, through conflict and cooperation with the Mongolian empire, we borrowed many elements of their statehood, which allowed us to build a powerful centralised state and forge a continental mentality of the Russian people.” Yes, "Mongols robbed but besides established conditions for development".
Today, it is hard to find whether Karaganov is another incarnation of Siberian mystic Grigorij Rasputin, or an agent of influence of the Military Intelligence Service. Whoever he is, we owe him gratitude and support.
For a review of the Russian strategy of historical justice, the author takes individual responsibility, without involving the authority of the Academy of War Art, the artistic university in which he works.
