In this world, it is indeed possible to launch a “war that will end all wars”: it would be a war that would consequence in the self-destruction of humanity. Therefore, it is unprecedentedly urgent to bring about a "room that will end all wars": the emergence of a spontaneous, bottom-up, informal and transnational alliance of people of good will against all war instigators who no longer have the thought of how to proceed to paralyse the world, that they want to destruct it entirely unselfishly. So present it is not a question of any "pacifist utopia", but of simple self-preservation—and not of any heroic idealism, but of natural opposition to pure psychopathy.
* * Oh, * *
Orwell dystopia is that no 1 can learn anything due to bans and censorship. Huxley dystopia is that no 1 wants to know anything due to laziness and apathy. Meanwhile, dystopia increasing out of the rubble of attempts to make these 2 firsts is that everyone can learn everything they want, and many search the position of the knowing, but nothing valuable from it.
In another words, these are respectively dystopes of repression, grumpiness and tacky, or political, cultural and spiritual dystopes. Hence, defeating the erstwhile lies in a consistent fight against external bondage, defeating the second – in a consistent fight against interior bondage, and defeating the second – in a consistent conflict in both of these fights for increasingly demanding purposes.
* * Oh, * *
To remember that logic has absolute precedence over love is to make certain that "love your neighbour as yourself" is not treated as the same as "allow another people's absurdities as your own."
* * Oh, * *
“The end of history” is not about the emergence of any permanent earthly utopia, nor even the emergence of any permanent “balance of prosperity”, but on an open, globally coordinated effort to impose suicidal dystopia on the planet – and on the fact that even a tiny number will categorically deny any part of it to the end.
Jakub Bożydar Wiśniewski
