Security should go both ways. But not according to the Left
Ms Anna Maria Żukowska during the debate at the “Super Express” suggested that the rape charge itself should suffice and no evidence would be necessary.
Change the definition of rape. It can no longer be that the victim must prove that she defended herself, that she screamed, that she must have any witnesses to this— explained her mistake Żukowska.
On the 1 hand, it cannot be hidden that it is indeed hard to prove rape by a victim, especially if it has been a long time since the crime. Then it would be of small usage to us to make a guess. However, the celebrity planet itself shows us that it is very easy to fall victim to unjust accusations. Then, even if it turns out that nothing truly happened, social strategism continues.
Let me remind you that the Left (Anna Górska, Anna Maria Żukowska) demands to destruct the presumption of innocence in rape cases.
This is simply a disgrace! That's not a good idea. Especially since there's quite a few cases where women talk and accuse a boy of rape. And this... https://t.co/L8IHzrtAMzpic.twitter.com/sW68MYFjAi
— Tysław (@tyslawski) September 12, 2023
And what is the specified presumption of innocence? It constitutes a key component of criminal law, which assumes that the individual charged with the crime is treated as innocent until his responsibility is proven legally. There is no denying that without this principle, we cannot talk of a fair and fair criminal trial. It allows the suspect to make a fair and nonsubjective presentation of evidence without relying on conjecture. The left clearly wants to change that for rape charges.
Anna Maria Żukowska. The Strangest Speeches
An analysed politician throughout her activities utilized so many unthought-out wordings that even a peculiar series was created on YouTube to score her views. I do not intend to mention absolutely everything here, but I will focus on the first controversy on the shore, which did not warrant Żukowska's support.
Regarding the comments made by 1 of the net users related to companies and ZUS (and Żukowska likes to fight on Twitter), the activist wrote:
Did you read with knowing or not? There's nothing about ZUS or taxes. It is about which companies make economical growth and where there are higher wages. The economy simply pays to advance employment in large companies, not to pat the mediocre company on the head.
Calling tiny activities "poor companies" in my opinion does not suit left-wing politicians.
The politician besides gained a nomination for Biological Nonsense of the Year erstwhile she assessed that “there are situations where a biological man is giving birth to a child”.
However, these 2 examples are abstraction from the subject that I took on the wallpaper. In my opinion, Żukowska's consequence to the post of the critic of Biedron for mistaking Kidawa-Błońska is the most powerful failure. The politician replied:
Either you're a politician and you take part in politics as an entity, or you're a jerk and your own surroundings treat you like furniture. “It’s Not Easy”? Who is he?
There is simply a clear sense of superiority and a message that if you are weak, you deserve to be called "slut". How does this coincide with Mrs. Żukowska's talking about rape victims? If we applied this message in the context of these victims, the effect would be disastrous.
Untouchable in group
It would seem that specified a large number of missteps (and I mentioned only three) would origin the politicians of the Left to say “enough” and send Anna Maria Żukowska to the reserve bench. However, practice shows that this is not the case. Why? The arm of mystery is avoided by any left-wingers.
Sharp words to Żukowska any time ago utilized Joanna Senyszyn. She told Newsweek that:
This sacred cattle in the organization and in the parliamentary club is only due to the fact that it is protected by the president of the Black as, without trying on, priests pedophile by its bishops.
Robert Kwiatkowski, who left the Czarzaste party, besides spared criticism, despite being his closest associate for more than 40 years. He welcomed the fact that:
Mrs. Żukowska's wisdom is no longer incriminating me. I feel free from them.
It's most likely a more black choice, due to the fact that he made his bride a organization spokesman. The black man will sink this party. https://t.co/vbfxqw4kLc
— Mr Pieczarka (@PM_herz) September 12, 2023
There are also, of course, politicians who take Żukowska in defence, appreciating the way she speaks and the full of her activities.
Anna Maria Żukowska is simply a politician who does not take prisoners. Especially on social media. What's in your heart is on your hand. He says what he thinks. He believes deep in what he says – is judged by Krzysztof Śmiszek.
