The eventual consequence of the "Great Reset"/" 2030 Agenda", etc., "globalistic" inventions are not a planet of "diversity, inclusiveness and sustainable development", i.e. not a planet of Maltese-Neomarksist-technology dystopia – only a planet of expanding wars, riots and acts of terrorism. This is due to the fact that the broader the attempts to build this dystopia, the more it exposes its grotesque, multi-story dysfunction. This, in turn, makes it an excellent mark for all actors who have fought against the "established single-polar order" on the banners, as long as their direct victims can be regarded as at least distant at the ft of that order.
From this, it follows that the common man is increasingly being pushed into the embrace of a terrible and false alternative. This alternate is either to admit that the "globalistic" dystopia is not the worst, and deserves at least conditional support, or to even partially take a stand on the side of terrorist radicals who will slow rot in the current order and replace its rapid, explosive liquidation. Alternatively, it is possible to manipulate ourselves in a more internally looped but equally fatal position that both parties are partially right, so they should make a "compromise" combining the best of their demands while avoiding the applicable "distortions".
However, since both of the above ideological fronts grow in the final account from the same revolutionary-discipline root, the expression of even a cautious preference for any of them is simply a de facto designation that the troublesome revolution in 1 form or another is inevitable. This revolution, on the another hand, has to do with itself, that its seemingly conflicted varieties continually fuel each another in their destructive upheaval, striving in the final position to neutralise each other.
Hence, continuing to stay distant from all of them—or even to fight them to the degree of their own capabilities—is not an absolute manifestation of the affirmative Aprilism or the adoption of Pilate's attitude, but the only way to keep spiritual sobriety in the planet of ubiquitous ideological calamities surpassing continually in its absurdity. It should not surprise, however, that the most appropriate way of life in the planet is highly frequently to keep a firm reserve for his "offer" – especially erstwhile they have long lost all temptation.
Jakub Bożydar Wiśniewski
