American Biological Weapons Programs
U.S. Intelligence orders inspection of 120 biological laboratories financed by the U.S. government abroad
The U.S. intelligence manager announced an inspection of over 120 biological laboratories in more than 30 countries, funded by the U.S. government for decades. More than 40 of these laboratories are located in Ukraine. Why didn't the German media study this?[ What about Polish? md]
Anti-Spiegel 15 May 2026
There are topics that German media simply don't want to talk about, topics that keep secret from German public opinion. 1 of them is biological weapons laboratories, funded and operated by the US worldwide. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, we have all known what it is to "enhance function" (to survey how to make pathogens that are harmless to humans dangerous to humans). These studies were banned in the United States due to their dangerous nature, but American scientists had express approval to conduct them in laboratories abroad.
This is precisely what happened in Wuhan, for example, where American investigator Peter Dazak explored how to make coronaviruses decision from bats to humans. These studies, by the way, were funded by the U.S. government. All of this is now indisputable and everyone can now ask themselves if it was a coincidence that there was an outbreak of COVID-19.
But the recipients of the major German media do not know anything about it due to the fact that they are silent about it, as they are silent about more than 40 American biolaboratories in Ukraine, where investigation on dangerous pathogens specified as Ebola and others has been conducted.
The fact that the US was very active in developing dangerous pathogens, or biological weapons, especially in Ukraine, is not up for discussion. Chronology and evidence can be found at the end of the article.
National Intelligence manager announced an inspection of over 120 biological laboratories in more than 30 countries, funded by the U.S. government for decades. More than 40 of these laboratories are located in Ukraine. She justified the inspection, stating that any of the laboratories were funded by the Pentagon and that the investigation carried out there raises "serious ethical, financial and safety concerns". The inspection will besides find which pathogens are being tested in these laboratories.
To put it simply: Washington evidently does not know what investigation is being conducted in these laboratories – I don't think he wants to know, due to the fact that that would let him to act stupid in case of an accident. This is simply a well-known intelligence strategy, for which even a method word exists: "reliable denial".
On May 11, 4 days ago, the "New York Post" reported a review of the biological labs, and Tulsi Gabbard and her intelligence agencies did not deny what meant that the reports were true, especially as the paper quoted a passage of the applicable statement.
Nevertheless, the U.S. mainstream media did not study it. And, of course, German media also, due to the fact that they traditionally keep the subject of American bioweapon laboratories completely secret from readers. And they've been doing it for years, due to the fact that Germany shouldn't know everything.
I am now translating a TASS article on the planned investigation of American intelligence agencies, followed by a chronology of publication on American weapons laboratories in Ukraine and another countries.
Start of Translation
The United States has started an inspection of biolaboratories: Can a genie be locked back in a bottle?
Andrei Surżanski about the White House's concerns about laboratories in the countries neighbouring Russia and whether these concerns will lead to concrete steps towards their closure.
On May 12, U.S. intelligence manager Tulsi Gabbard announced the launch of inspections of over 120 biolaboratories in more than 30 countries, funded for decades by American taxpayers. According to Gabbard, more than 40 of these laboratories are besides located in Ukraine. "The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed the disastrous consequences that investigation on dangerous pathogens in biolaboratories can have for the full world," stressed Gabbard. Trump administration officials have repeatedly claimed that coronavirus comes from a Chinese biolaboratory, whose workers have experimented with highly dangerous pathogens. The Chinese government denies it. The manager of Intelligence spoke shortly before Trump visited China. Coincidence? Anything is possible.
Not just ethical issues
It is worth noting that Gabbard made her message not during a congressional proceeding or press conference, but specifically for the conservative paper "New York Post". Although this paper is considered tabloid, it is the favourite of U.S. president Donald Trump. This is simply a alternatively different format for targeted dissemination of information. Moreover, the fresh York paper is not known for reporting specified serious topics as biological laboratories, pathogens, or biological weapons.
According to an article in the “New York Post”, the mission of the National Intelligence Agency is to “locate laboratories, identify pathogens in them and identify investigation carried out there”. According to the newspaper, any of the laboratories received backing under the Pentagon program, implemented after the end of the Cold War, aimed at eliminating weapons of mass destruction. The article states that the clinical trials carried out there “are raising serious ethical, financial and safety concerns”.
In March 2022, While Gabbard was inactive a private person, she called for the immediate closure of 25–30 US-funded biolaboratories in Ukraine and the demolition of pathogens. This was met with criticism of many American neoconservatives, including erstwhile Republican Senator Mitt Romney. Romney accused Gabbard of “papping Russian propaganda’. This time, the manager of National Intelligence explained, referring to about 40 laboratories in Ukraine to be reviewed, that they are “at hazard of being compromised (i.e. a data leak) as a consequence of the Russian-Ukrainian War”.
Let us remind you: December 2022, by the way 9. Review Conference of States Parties to the Biological Weapons Convention In Geneva, the Russian Ministry of Defence provided compelling evidence that Ukraine, with the support of the US, was conducting investigation on bioweapon components. The studies focused on pathogens causing peculiarly dangerous and economically crucial infections.
Although Gabbard did not mention any another countries outside Ukraine, abroad Minister Sergei Lavrow stated in the same year that US-funded biological laboratories be in Armenia, Kazakhstan and Central Asia. Moscow then discussed this issue with its neighbours, both bilaterally and within the Organisation of the Collective safety Agreement (OUBZ).
Working on past mistakes
The fresh York Post reminds you thatBiden's administration powerfully denied the existence of American biological laboratories in Ukraine, setting specified claims as Chinese and Russian propaganda. According to the newspaper, these denials were part of a strategy of ‘information resilience’ aimed at influencing public opinion and ‘simplifying and counteracting harmful abroad influences’, while at the same time disguising the ties between the US and these studies. However, during the legislature hearing, the then Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland had to admit that there were indeed biological investigation centres in Ukraine, but she stressed that they were investigation centers alternatively than biological weapons laboratories. At the time, the Americans were profoundly afraid that these laboratories might fall into the hands of the Russian army.
Last May, U.S. president Trump signed an executive regulation banning government backing for investigation into improving pathogens in China, Iran and another countries without appropriate supervision. The Regulation states: "Dangerous investigation into strengthening the functions of biological vectors and pathogens could seriously endanger the lives of American citizens".
Critics argued that mediocre supervision of funding, which frequently goes to customers through American agencies, prevents cognition of possibly dangerous experiments. According to the U.S. Department of Defense, the United States funded investigation into pathogens abroad with a sum of $1.4 billion between 2014 and 1923. However, the Office of the General Inspector of the Department of Defence was incapable to find to what degree these funds were utilized for investigation into possible pandemic pathogens.
The same day Gabbard's message was published, U.S. Secretary of defence Pete Hegseth published a akin comment on the substance in Newsweek. "The erstwhile administration financed dangerous, virulent investigation and biological laboratories abroad from American taxpayers' money and deliberately hid it from the American people," he continued, "The disclosure of this information shows how badly this work was supervised. Under the leadership of president Trump, National Intelligence manager Tulsi Gabbard and the full cabinet fix these historical mistakes and reconstruct justice to our soldiers and those they protect. The era of lies and betrayal is over.”
It is clear that Gabbard and Hegseth's statements on biological laboratories were a coordinated action. The question is: what was their goal? It is besides interesting to consider their mark audience: American public opinion or abroad countries? As far as we know, the reaction in the United States itself was small. And mainstream media mostly ignored the fresh York Post report. It's rather different that the media cites competition, especially tabloids.
Can the United States charge Zelenski?
Leonid Słucki, president of the Committee on global Affairs of State Duma and leader of the Liberal-Democratic organization of Russia (LDPR), commented on Gabbard's statement, suggesting that The U.S. can charge Ukraine with producing biological weapons. "The Zełenski government will inevitably gotta answer not only for large-scale corruption – the criminal case of Jermak-Mindich already counts 40 volumes – but besides for the criminal creation of an experimental camp in Ukraine for the production of deadly biological weapons" wrote Słucki on his channel Max.
The MP recalled that the State Duma and the Federation Council conducted a parliamentary investigation in the 19202/23, involving many Russian and abroad experts. 1 of the findings of the committee was that in Ukraine, under the cover of ‘bio-medical activities’, military-industrial projects are being implemented, which is simply a violation of the Biological Weapons Convention.
Experts believe that the results of the Gabbard investigation may have serious consequences not only for US abroad policy but besides for global technological cooperation. If the financing of abroad investigation centres in the field of biotechnology is importantly reduced, the Allied States in which specified centres are located may be subject to stricter controls and regulations.
Jeff Singer, a elder investigator at the Cato Institute, believes that Gabbard's announcement of the initiation of the investigation is timely and justified. "If the government subsidises laboratories abroad with taxpayers' money, it has a work to guarantee that these studies do not harm us," he told Newsweek magazine.
However, there are besides objections that the investigation is based on a large-scale disinformation run conducted by Russia and China. Even assuming the Trump administration intends to usage this issue as an additional argument against Zelensk to force him to accept the terms of the conflict settlement agreement, Washington surely realizes that moving biological laboratories in Ukraine is simply a dangerous game with fire. The same considerations seemingly had a decisive impact on the White House's decision to supply the government in Kiev with Tomahawk maneuvering missiles.
Alexey Szably, chemical analysis expert and method manager of Holding Polymetal already, believes the problem is that Pentagon-funded biological laboratories worldwide have gotten out of US control. "A large part of the projects of these biological laboratories are covered by the U.S. Department of Defense's threat simplification programme, which aimed at controlling the disposal of components of weapons of mass demolition after the Cold War. Bioweapon studies have been conducted in these laboratories and are likely to continue. The US's control of these studies is so weak that they have actually become the main origin of the threats they have been set up to combat. Even the manager of the U.S. National Intelligence Service admitted this," TASS agency expert said.
When establishing biological laboratories in Ukraine, Americans seemingly did not realize the threat they posed. And stopping this threat will be difficult.
End of translation
Chronology of publications
As promised, we present a chronology of fresh years' publications on American bioweapon research.
Already in early March 2022, the Russian Ministry of Defence published papers proving that Ukraine hastily destroyed dangerous pathogens after the Russian military operation began. Meanwhile, the West denied the existence of these pathogens in Ukraine. besides in early March, the Russian Ministry of Defence published detailed information on the pathogens investigated and identified American organisations involved.
What was considered "Russian propaganda" at the beginning of March 2022 was indirectly confirmed under oath by U.S. Deputy Secretary of State, Nuland, a fewer days later during a proceeding before the U.S. Congress, but Western media did not consider it worthy of attention.
Similarly, the fact that the WHO just a fewer days later called on Kiev to destruct "highly dangerous pathogens" – pathogens that, according to Western media and politicians, Kiev allegedly did not even own – was not considered interesting adequate for Western media to inform about it. As a result, fewer people in the West know this, while Russian media reported it in detail.
In late March 2022, the Russian Ministry of Defence published further details and papers on the U.S. bioweapon programme in Ukraine, revealing, among another things, that it was funded by the fresh York company Rosemont Seneca. The permanent readers of “Anti-Spiegel” recognise this company due to the fact that it played a crucial function in Ukraine in a different context. Incidentally, the company belongs to huntsman Biden, boy of the president of the United States.
In late March 2022, the Russian Ministry of Defence revealed further details and papers on the U.S. bioweapon programme in Ukraine, revealing among another things that fresh York's company Rosemont Seneca was active in its funding. Shortly thereafter, it was revealed that American specialists in Ukraine besides conducted human tests. Further details were published in mid-April and early May 2022. In addition, erstwhile U.S. president George W. Bush, though reluctantly, admitted in mid-May the existence of American bioweapon programs initiated during his regulation in Ukraine.
In early June 2022, a conference was held in Moscow on the Pentagon's biological weapons programs in Ukraine, where publically known facts were gathered. I besides participated. I reported this in 2 articles
In mid-June 2022, the Russian Ministry of Defence published many information on American bioweapon and tested pathogens programs, and further details appeared in early July.
In early August 2022, the Russian Ministry of Defence announced that it considered COVID-19 as an American biological weapon, and in early September further details were published on US bioweapon programs in Ukraine.
In September 2022 Russia convened a peculiar gathering of States Parties to the Convention on Biological Weapons, presented their findings to them and asked 20 questions to the United States and Ukraine, to which they could not or refused to answer. The Russian Ministry of Defence published further details in December. In late January 2023, the Russian Ministry of Defence added further details.
In early March 2023, the Russian Ministry of Defence first commented on mRNA vaccines, and in early April 2023 published further details on these dangerous vaccines.
In early May 2023, the Russian Ministry of Defence published further details on the Pentagon's survey of migratory birds in Ukraine, which could be utilized to spread infectious diseases. Further details were published at the end of May 2023.
At the end of May 2023, the Russian Ministry of Defence published further information on Pentagon's investigation into migratory birds in Ukraine, which it claimed could be utilized to spread infectious diseases. In June 2023, the Russian Ministry of Defence began reporting on the function of Bill Gates and investigation on mosquitoes and ticks in the context of US bioweapon programmes, publishing further information in July 2023.
In August 2023, the Russian Ministry of Defence reinforced accusations that the United States had created COVID-19 and prepared a pandemic. The ministry has warned that the United States is seemingly already preparing for a fresh pandemic, albeit with far more dangerous pathogens.
In early September and October 2023, the Russian Ministry of Defence again focused on reports of how the United States hide its programs and avoid global inspections.
In August 2024, the Russian Ministry of Defence indicated that the Pentagon had donated funds for biological weapons investigation to another departments to cover its tracks.
