PRESIDENT

Most Poles are now engaged in the eating of holidays and then in confusion about the vows of judges elected to the Constitutional Court. What's all this fuss about? In order to realize this, and even gotta have: an eque, an apple, a Mendelev board, decks of self-consciousness, a view of the Tatras, can be on the net and much, much madness. You gotta draw all this to understand. To this end: you take a clean part of paper, a black mazak, a pen, close your eyes and a minute scribble after a card, so zu, zu, zu, zu, za. Then you will receive the exact strategy of the situation that politicians have prepared for the Constitutional Court. Moreover, the thing about the oath of judges is about interpreting the word "against", "marriage to the President". The president explains to everyone and to him that it means in his presence. But the constitutional evidence does not specify the distance from the president to which he is characterized. due to the fact that it could mean that the swearing justice has to hug the president, or stand a maximum of 5 meters from him, and do the assembler and the pledge taker should be in the same room?