Wielomski: German Empire in Munich

The yearly Munich safety Conference just ended. It is simply a very crucial global event, but in Polish media it has never enjoyed more interest. most likely due to the fact that the content expressed there is besides hard for pelicanate in front of TVs. This is not a propaganda event, but a substantive event. Consistently, the large media, mentioning this year's edition, focused on Marco Rubio's speech, who, contrary to predictions, did not run over Western Europe, as J.D. Vance did a year ago.

In my view, the 2 most crucial speeches were given by the 2 leading German imperialists, namely Chancellor Friedrich Merz and president of the European Commission Frau Ursula von der Leyen. Merz gave a large speech about the collapse of the planet based on “rules”. Under this concept, Western propaganda understands the principles which the West imposed upon the full world, and resulting from the liberal explanation of global relations, where, under the pretext of democracy, human rights and global law, neocolonial policy has been practiced for decades at the expense of the Global South. The Chancellor stated that the “rules” are breaking not only Russia and China, but besides the United States are becoming unpredictable in their policies. Therefore, the RFN must make the largest conventional army in Europe to militaryly lead the continent in the event of Russian aggression. To this end, the European Union needs to be rapidly federated and so "we are now jointly developing a common road map for a strong and sovereign Europe. Europe must become a origin in planet policies with its own safety strategy." Merz then explained to us that this is to be done on the basis of Article 42, paragraph 7 of the Treaty of the European Union without developing details.

Why didn't Chancellor Merz make the details? due to the fact that 2 days earlier, Article 42, paragraph 7, carefully discussed Frau Ursula von der Leyen in her speech. We have learned from her speech that as shortly as Ukraine is admitted to the European Union, this article will immediately be launched and the fundamental rule of unanimity for the EU will be abolished. With curiosity I reached out to the quoted article. I am not a specialist in EU law, but I felt instinctively that something was not right here, especially since the head of the European Commission herself mentioned his "creative" interpretation. Here's what we're curious in Article 42, paragraph 7:

‘Where any associate State becomes the victim of armed aggression in its territory, the another associate States shall be obliged to assist and support it by any means available to them, in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. This does not affect the circumstantial nature of the safety and defence policy of certain associate States. Commitments and cooperation in this area shall be in line with the commitments entered into within the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation which, for the associate States, remains the basis of their collective defence and the forum for its implementationIt’s okay. ”

Indeed, a typical German "creativity" is needed to remove the anticipation of abolishing the national veto on the basis of this provision and to change the rule of decision-making to the majority due to the fact that the quoted passage does not say anything about it. In fact, he speaks at all of the situation of "armourous aggression" against 1 of the associate States, and nothing like that happens. So how did Friedrich Merz and Frau Ursula come to that conclusion? I can only guess that on the basis of specified a pseudo-logical sequence: Ukraine will yet make peace with Russia (because they will force it on Kiev Americans) → The European Union will not formally recognise this peace or treat it only as a temporary truce until the reflection of Crimea and Donbass, and not as an end to the war → Ukraine will be admitted to the EU → The European Commission and the most crucial states recognise that the EU is at war, so they activate Article 42, paragraph 7 → citing the exceptive situation of "armoured aggression" on the associate State, The European Commission will announce that the "temporary" rule of the veto of the associate States is suspended → over time, the situation of the "time" will become permanent and whoever opposes will prove to be "unlawful" and will be cut off by EU grants. And what don't you understand?

Donald Tusk and Radosław Sikorski danced in this German music in Munich. The erstwhile proved to be a fresh incarnation of the “ministers of the Ukrainian people” and alongside various laudations for Volodymir Żeleński – a terrible politician who allowed his own country to enter Proxy war between the US and Russia, lending his territory, he made an interesting statement. It must have seemed crucial to the government, for his spokesman, Adam Sz Trapka, put it on his X - profile: “Live free and independent Ukraine! Long live a strong and united Europe!" This is an interesting slogan, which logically indicates that Ukraine is to be "free and independent", while Poland awaits the destiny of the east March of the "strong and united" German empire. likewise comic was Radosław Sikorski, who stated that since Europe has paid so much for the war in Ukraine, it has a moral right to participate in peace talks. If Trump and Putin listened to those words, they would rotation over the carpets with the same thought: “We rolled each another Proxy war Ukraine. Europeans have, of their own free will, begun to finance 1 of the parties, and now they are going to cry for a peace conference that will regulate the global relations between Russia and the United States. Their heads (and not just their heads) were overturned!’

Yeah, it fell over. The full conference was carried over by the narcissistic self-obsessment of the European elite over themselves, over its strength, moral superiority and over their "rules". Trump smoking a cigar said to himself, “You have no cards!”

Adam Wielomski