Published by the Conference of the Polish Episcopal, a letter on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of John Paul II's visit to the Roman synagogue caused serious theological and pastoral controversy. The document, which was to be an expression of Catholic-Jewish dialogue, for many became a symbol of the departure of Polish bishops from the unequivocal teaching of the Gospel to the contrary to Tradition, false ecumenism with Talmudists.
Some Polish churches read heretic letter of KEP. Already at the beginning of the letter, bishops focus on the problem of “anti-Semitism”, identifying it as 1 of the “deathary deficits of love”. The very condemnation of hatred is, of course, in harmony with Christianity. The problem, however, is that the paper seems to make it a central point of reflection, marginalizing the key fact of faith—the saving work of Jesus Christ.
Such construction shifts the burden of teaching from salvation theology to historical and social issues. The Gospel is no longer a mention point, but a background for modern narratives about dialog and past wines.
However, the most controversial passage concerns the assessment of the past of the Church. The letter states that for more than 1,500 years, certain words “have contributed to hatred, persecution and anti-Semitism.” specified a thesis – even if the intention was to indicate errors of the people of the Church – in practice undermines the continuity of teaching. For he suggests that for a 1000 and a half years the Church as specified continued in serious error.
From a Catholic theology perspective, this position is hard to defend. It would mean that Tradition – 1 of the pillars of Revelation – was not a reliable average of truth. Consequently, the question arises: if the Church has been incorrect for centuries, why should it not be incorrect today?
However, there is no little tension in the passage that “Israel remains a chosen nation”. In conventional Christian teaching, the election of Israel was preparatory and found its fulfillment in Christ. The fresh Covenant hates the old 1 in the sense of negation, but points out that it was fulfilled, shifting an accent from ethnicity to faith. In another words, the fresh Israel - the chosen nation - has been since Jesus' day all those who believed in His message, without the privileged position of the Jews who denied Him and led to the crucifixion and persecution of His disciples.
But the wording utilized in the letter suggests a parallel way of salvation, independent of Christ. It is this component that raises the most serious reservations, due to the fact that it touches the very centre of Christianity: the belief that Jesus Christ is the only Savior.
Thus the letter fits into a broader trend of Christian Zionism and the exaltation of Talmudism over Christianity. The bishops emphasize the “links connecting Jews and Christians” and the peculiar nature of this relationship. The problem is that the dialog between the KEP and Judaism is completely one-sided (there are no days of Catholicism in any Talmudic or cabalistic denomination), and additionally begins to replace Christ's testimony.
Christianity is not 1 of many equal spiritual ways, but a way revealed by God in the individual of Christ. If this foundation is blurred, dialog ceases to be a tool of evangelization, and becomes a form of relativism and political indoctrination in the spirit of inexpensive Zionism for goys.
In the background of the full case, there is simply a deeper crisis among the spiritual hierarchy – deficiency of clarity and courage in preaching the truths of faith. alternatively of clearly pointing to Christ as the center of the past of salvation, a cautious, diplomatic, imprecise language appears. This in turn leads to confusion of the faithful. If the Church ceases to clearly specify its own identity, it loses the ability to carry out its primary mission, or lead people to salvation.
Christianity cannot be without mention to Christ as the sole Savior. Any effort to blur this truth, even motivated by the desire for dialogue, leads to a weakening of the very essence of faith. dialog is needed—but only if it does not replace the truth, but clearly and courageously expresses it. With this, we request to say this openly – KEP entered the way of heresy and fighting the Church of Jesus Christ.
It is besides worth noting that KEP's letter was published under highly unfavorable conditions, specified as the judaic genocide carried out in the Gaza ghetto and the Jewish-American assault war that Iran suffered. Under specified circumstances, it is easy to ask for reflection that the hidden intent of the letter is to expel the faithful from the churches, and here is simply a real crime.
We besides recommend: Netanjah openly attacked Jesus and Christianity
