Three after three: Correct Succession

Presidential election behind the belt. By the time the next issue “Liberté!” comes out, the fresh head of state will be known. Who's it gonna be? It is not known, but the successions at the political summits show any correctness. frequently the successor is the denial of his predecessor.

Donald Trump, for example, was elected for 2 but not 2 consecutive terms, had 2 predecessors. The first of them – Barack Obama – was an intelligent, eloquent and read man. As a result, his denial Trump was proving hard to realize beyond 150 words of text blunt, whose most advanced reading proved to be news strips on Fox News, and the speeches showed a refinement only somewhat higher than the speeches of his friend, Hulk Hogan (because already another wrestlers like The stone and Stone Cold Steve Austin. they utilized a much more complex language). In addition, Obama united the nation, was a community-forming institution, despite the drastic American polarization. Trump gave the country a polarizing orgasm. Obama was a sign of the future and a link to the visible overcoming of racism by society. Trump is simply a sign of grotesque nostalgia behind the past and the standing of white supremacy.

Trump's second predecessor is Joe Biden. He's a elder who is characterized by calm and calm. Trump is simply a distracted kid in the body of an old man who loves to communicate his moods to the global public, even respective times a day. Biden pursued a policy of reason and calculation. Trump considers reasonable as the invention of the media hostile to him, and the calculation of the 8-year-old in the composition of fireworks.

Pope Francis besides denied Benedict XVI, who died respective days ago. The German pope was conservative in his views and old-fashioned in his behaviors, manners and selection of his "revisites". Francis was (for a Catholic clergyman) rather progressive, said something affirmative about LGBT people, fought against climate change, appealed for mercy on refugees and branded capitalism twice. Ratzinger was distanced from the people he loved from afar, and among the crowds he felt like a lover of Ed Sheeran at Behemoth's concert, despite the enthusiasm of these crowds towards him. Bergoglio among the people felt best unless they were... cardinals like Ratzinger. Benedict dressed himself in gold and jewels almost as abundantly as Marek Jędraszewski, and he wore red slippers with devotion worthy teenager wearing “jordorans”. Francis wore these black shoes after 5 visits to a shoemaker, most likely mainly to troll his predecessor.

So what will be Andrew Duda's successor? Which set of features of this rich personality will form the antithesis in the form of its successor? Will the fresh president of Poland deny the conservatism and painfully deep writing of Duda? He will reject his contempt for the constitution, break the habit of giving anti-EU tirades (or mostly tirade), item his better ability to decision around the world, but "friend in need” not “friend in dick”?

That would be good. But Duda's successor may besides be a man who will deny him as a weakling, threatening only from a mine, but undoubtedly a player of "lightweight". It may be individual who breaks up with clowning during speeches, turning Dudish rudeness into immaculate kindness, for which he hides cold calculating. individual who rejects the President's imagination as a president of the kisser and for the Sun of the Nation will foretell only a function in the "Little Bu" kind erstwhile he settles in the Palace.

Then quit all hope.