Ombudsman Marcin Wiązek asked the D.A. and the wellness minister of Izabela Leschina whether she had intervened in connection with the pregnancy appointment at the infirmary in Oleśnica in the patient in the 36th week of pregnancy. Regardless, Łukasz Patulski submitted a announcement to the prosecutor about the anticipation of the judaic doctor Gizela Jagielska committing a crime.
There's a announcement about the Oleśnica abortion. On Friday, the Office of the Ombudsman asked the territory Prosecutor's Office in Oleśnica to supply details of the proceedings. It besides asked for a copy of the answer given to the Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, which asked the Ministry of wellness for clarification on the explanation of the concept of "continuation".
“Marcin Wiączek besides asks for information on findings made at the request of the Minister by the National wellness Fund and the Ombudsman in connection with information in the public space related to the way the Central Clinical infirmary of the Medical University of Łódź provides wellness services to the patient concerned” – informed in the communication.
Marcin Wiązek besides asked for information on the findings made by the National wellness Fund and the Ombudsman of Patient Rights in connection with reports in public space on the provision of wellness services by the Central Clinical infirmary of the Medical University of Łódź patient concerned.
Regardless, a announcement was sent to the D.A. about the anticipation of Gizela Jagielska committing a crime. Information published on his profiles Łukasz Patulski. Here is the content of the announcement sent to the prosecutor's office:
NOTIFICATION OF A SURVEILLANCE
Pursuant to Art. 304 §1 k.p.k., I notify the suspicion of a number of crimes committed by Gizela Jagielska, a gynecologist conducting a medical practice whose actions led to death in the womb of the reported mother, a healthy child, a boy named Felek in 9 months of pregnancy.
This action shall include:
Article 148 §1 (k) — homicide,
Article 153 §2 (k) — unlawful termination of pregnancy,
Article 255 §2 and §3 of the Code – calling for a crime or genocide,
Article 18 §2 k.k. – incitement or incitement to murder,
Article 286 §1 (k) – act by trickery in order to get a property benefit.
According to many sources, Gizela Jagielska had an abortion in the 9th period of pregnancy. As an authoritative reason, the suspicion of genetic illness – osteogenetics imperfecta (bone failure), the effects of which were expected to prevent the kid from continuing to live. Meanwhile:
The diagnosis of this illness is prenatally inaccurate, especially with milder forms. This illness is not lethal in most cases, and people with types I, III and IV live, work and start families. No independent expert opinions were submitted to confirm the fatal nature of the disease. The kid was reported, full developed and ready to live outside the womb.
A number of public opinions on Mrs. Jagielska's activities point to her utilizing deception, i.e. the transmission of manipulated or false diagnoses and the raising of fear, in order to convince women to abortion. There are descriptions of deficiency of empathy, emotional blackmail, ignoring alternatives (e.g. perinatal hospice), and even false information about the condition of the fetus.
These activities were carried out in order to get a property benefit in the form of remuneration for the procedure.
Encouraging a pregnant woman, or a individual in a state of intellectual instability (which is commonly known and recognised by the legislator) to have an abortion on a kid in 9 months of pregnancy, can be treated as an incitement to murder.
Article 149 k.k. provides for peculiar mitigating circumstances for mothers who kill a kid after childbirth under the influence of strong emotions.
Therefore, the conscious call for these emotions by 3rd parties, and especially a doctor, should be treated as a call for murder, and in many cases as a call for prenatal genocide.
In my opinion, we are dealing not with an individual case, but with an component of the systemic killing of unborn children under the appearance of medicine, which is carried out for financial benefit and for ideological purposes.
OUR COMMENTS: We are rooting for both of the proceedings begun. We are hoping that this time the case will not be swept under the carpet by the Tusk government, and the disgusting doctor from Oleśnica, who seems to feel satisfied with killing children and - as everything indicates - cheats her patients about the condition of their offspring's health, at least lose her right to prosecute the profession.
We besides recommend: Andrzej Duda addressed the Act on “Speak of Hate” to the Constitutional Court. What's next?
