The beginning of war ch.5. The conflict to free the nation. Bartosz Kopczyński.

dakowski.pl 18 hours ago

The beginning of war ch.5. The Liberation Fight of a Nation

Author: AlterCabrio , July 7, 2025

This Article is the fifth, last part of the minicycle of war, provoked by the tiny state of the Chazars and caused by the large Anglo-Saxons. Finally, we will consider the current and future alliances of Poland.

−∗−

The beginning of war ch.5. The Liberation Fight of a Nation

Previous parts:

Our Place in the World

For the thought of redefining an alliance with the U.S., most of today's experts will cry out that it's impossible, we gotta submit to US politics, due to the fact that if not, then... Yeah, due to the fact that if not, what? They're going to answer that Russia is about to attack us, so we request to arm ourselves very much and be the strongest routing on the east flank. That is the responsibility of reasoning over the Vistula, which we should get free of as shortly as possible. We shouldn't be any flank of any block, we should be building our own block.

Our geopolitical position stems from the geography of Eurasia and natural trade routes. They were hampered by the improvement of maritime transport and maritime powers. This enabled Britain, and then America, to freely form their spheres of influence, looting and exploiting the full planet according to their own needs, any ascending governments, others overthrowing. In the system, organized by the naval power, the lands of Poland will always be in a crushing zone. On the 1 hand, we have Western Europe, having a convenient exit to the planet ocean, and on the another hand a large Eurasian massif, for which the most convenient access to the ocean leads to European ports, right through our lands. For us, the location on specified a way would be very beneficial, but it is dangerous for the powers of the sea, due to the fact that it allows Eurasian communication on interior lines, without intermediation of maritime routes and beyond the control of maritime powers. This means not only the failure of profits by the maritime power, but their failure of control of what is happening in Eurasia.

These would benefit countries, located on interior trade routes, especially Poland. Then we wouldn't be on the edge, but downtown. Poland should not be anyone's flank, but the MOST and THE WATCHER of EURAZIA. The bridge, due to the fact that it connects the East to the West. The guard, due to the fact that she controls the bridge and can close it. However, it will not do so for any reason, due to the fact that the vital interest of Poland is to guarantee that flows go, not that the blockades continue. The main function of The Watchtower is not to close the bridge, but to keep order and to collect the toll. So that means that It is in the vital interest of Poland to join the Chinese initiative of the fresh Silk Road.

However, a number of questions arise. First of all, what does America say? For today, it's clear that there's no mention of it, our allies are holding our hands and they won't let it. However, the world’s affairs are in the new. Global hegemon no longer can and does not want to be global, so it tries to be local with maintaining its influence on the remainder of the world. There is simply a good chance of convincing America to this task if Poland is able to keep order on the Eurasia Bridge, which will mean stableness in our region. And the stableness of our region is 1 of the guarantors of stableness in the world. Poland will be able to keep this stableness if it has unchangeable political power, with constant support of a minimum of 1/3 of the population. The stableness of power means no attacks from the outside or from the inside. The divisions within Poland have usually been and are caused by abroad centres of power, including the USA, Germany and the Gnostic Chazars, to a lesser degree by Russia. The stableness of the situation in the region would remove the concern for control of this part of Europe from America, as the interest of Poland would be clearly defined and America would be curious in trade, which by Poland and Western Europe would go further to the Atlantic.

The position of Poland as the Bridge and the Guardian of Eurasia can so have 2 meanings for America, depending on the planet position America itself will take. For the U.S. as a planet hegemon, this concept is unacceptable due to the fact that it hinders Asia's control by the naval power. In this variant, the US needs an iron curtain in the vicinity of Poland to cut Russia and China off access to the planet ocean through Western Europe. In this way, thanks to their power of sea, air and US bases, they can hold control over trade between China and Russia and the remainder of the world. In the long run, however, this is insurmountable, due to the fact that on the 1 hand, America bears besides much cost and gets active in conflicts, and on the another hand, Asia will yet break the cordon of the naval power. This policy, America will shortly be incapable to lead.

It is so appropriate to propose to America a solution that will let it to keep control of the Atlantic region while withdrawing from the function of the planet hegemon. This is an chance to shift parts of the stream of goods from Chinese ports to European ports, thanks to the fresh Silk Road, which will end with the Bridge and the Guardian of Eurasia in Poland. The sceptics are about to put 3 issues: whether it is possible to be independent geopolitics of Poland, whether Russia will conquer us, and whether China will dominate us.

Independent geopolitics of Poland

The West, dominated by Chazarian gnostics, will never consider us an entity and a partner, no substance how friendly Polish-language politicians of the Pinocian school will be. They will admit us only if we are a force that cannot be underestimated. In order not to do so, the elite of the West do everything possible so that we cannot strengthen ourselves. Poland must be strong in all respect in order to talk to Western politicians and get good conditions for Poles, but it will not be so long as it is subject to decisions from the West. Poland could build on interior reforms, which would mean rejecting a crucial part of European economical policy and American strategical policy. This process is theoretically possible, but in practice any government that would enter this road would be overthrown. The powerful political, economic, financial assets that the West has conquered us from the outside would be utilized for this purpose, and the operative assets within our country.

In addition, the process of specified reforms would take many years by its own means, and at that time we would be ahead of that part of the planet that is developing economically. I don't mean Europe, it's coming, but the BRICS and the US. For our own improvement and security, we request a large strategical alliance with the East and the South. Russia has inexpensive resources, strategical depth, a large territorial outlet marketplace and military possible that the West fears. Belarus lies at our borders and has economical potential. China has production, a large population market, investment needs and expanding military potential. Iran has inexpensive natural materials, a crucial marketplace and military potential. Turkey has a population, economical and military potential.

These are any of the most crucial countries willing to cooperate with Poland, freed from Western tyranny. All these countries have policies that are independent of the West and work well. There are not only alliances between them, but besides competition, which a wise Polish policy could usage for our purposes.

China

It is apparent that if the Chinese see an opportunity, they will search to take control of the territory that they are curious in and Poland belongs to. However, this is not an exclusive Chinese condition, but a fixed component of geopolitical reasoning for all players of the planet chess party. There is no specified reasoning on the Vistula River due to the fact that geopolitics are not cultivated, nor is it even aimed at sovereignty from abroad. This is, in part, a modern European trait, and partially due to the fact that those acting as politicians are actually substituted servants of the chassar gnostics, the Aliens pretending to be their own.

Therefore, the Polish policy since Sanation does not presume national, sovereign, independent and geopolitical reasoning at all, but looks at who to sale yourself here. It's political prostitution. Therefore, we should not be offended by the Chinese and any another US country including that it wants to keep us under control, but to act to avoid this control. The current submission of Warsaw's power towards the West is an invitation to the another players to take over Poland as a inexpensive prey, while the Poles themselves are passive. If Poles consistently conduct their own abroad and economical policy, they will become an attractive partner for China due to their position, and the Chinese will respect strong power in Poland and like to get along with us alternatively than make us dependent. An effort to become dependent on another country is simply a large solution erstwhile it is weak and does not resist. However, erstwhile the state has strong power, supported by the population, it is very hard to take over, as shown by the example of Iran, where the Chazars failed to change power despite a powerful attack.

Russia, Poland, West

Our attitude towards Russia is dictated by 2 factors: historical and Chara-Gnostic sentiments, cultivated by Polish-language media, Aliens pretending to be their own and ignorant. Resentments make us believe that Russia is planning nothing but to attack Poland, due to the fact that that is its eternal determinism. Russia just has to do it, and it will. Supporters of this concept are not seeking confirmation of their own in the contemporary interests of Russia either, but in the events of the past 300 years. Further supporters of the inevitability of the Russian invasion match Russian repression in Poles, especially after the uprisings, during the revolution, the Bolshevik War and planet War II. The Smolensk bombing is complete.

Indeed, many facts confirm Russian penetration and aggression on Polish lands. We request to tell modern Poles a actual image of history, not its falsified version, given in schools and media. There's no place for that, but a fewer words request to be said. There are no doubts about the conflicts between Poland and Russia, but in order to measure them fairly, we besides request to see external influences in both Russia and Poland. These influences can be described as Anglo-Prussian and Chazar-Gnostic. They appeared in both countries in the 16th century and led to an aflame of common conflicts. Poland was already intended for liquidation at the time, and Russia for promotion, growth and acquisition, as well as the USA. On the 1 hand, therefore, we had an influence on the power in Russia in the direction of partitions and repression, on the another hand, on forces in Poland that provoke us to meaningless uprisings and exposure ourselves to repression of authoritarian power of the Byzantine type.

Thus, the past of Russia's conflicts with Poland will request to be carefully analysed in order to see how much Moscow's real push to the West was there, and how much action of abroad forces, hostile to both nations and countries. As for the Smolensk bombing, the case is inactive unclear and intentionally confusing. no of the committees formally appointed to explain the substance met the expectations of Poles. The Macerewicz study suggesting the work of Russia, although sensational, raises serious doubts. The question is why the Russian services should do specified work at their home and draw attention, and why, after announcing the report, the then PiS government, having a parliament, government and president, did nothing to this knowledge, but media foam. So we don't know who did the assassination, and there are not only Russian, but besides German, British, American, and Kazar services on the list of suspects.

As for repression, their scale and cruelty are striking, especially in the first half of the 20th century, erstwhile Russia was ruled by communists. This, however, needs to be analysed more closely. It will then turn out that the Bolshevik revolution was besides caused by Charzarist gnostics, constituting the majority of the organization apparatus and coercion and terror. Lenin's transfer organized the German General Staff for the money of the applicable bankers, the later Bolshevik state was besides funded from City of London and Wall Street, which utilized Russian natural materials in return. The full Russian experimentation with communism was a Gnostic experiment, just like the full American state.

Through these historical events, however, the majority of Poles exclude the thought of even economical cooperation, let alone political cooperation with Russia. They do not realize that the Russian policy of the last 300 years has been partially controlled from the outside, as well as the US policy. They usually interfere with Polish crimes committed by Russians, or another people, as Russians recognized. At any voice calling for normalization of east relations they immediately respond with a cry about Russian onus. However, someway these onucowers are not disturbed by crimes committed by Germans in Poles. It is verbally, but actually Germany does what they want in Poland.

The Swedes, too, were cruel in the 17th and 18th centuries, and no 1 is reasoning of breaking trade relations with Sweden. The Czechs and Slovaks have besides frequently been hostile to us. The USA, large Britain and France besides have a lot on their conscience towards Poland. And Ukrainian. Theoretically, we remember the emergence of Chmielnicki, Collision and Volyn. However, onucators do not head letting millions of Ukrainians into Poland without control, destroying Polish agriculture with Ukrainian products, giving the Ukrainian country Polish weapons and assets and helping him in war, risking retaliation against Russia. So, with different neighbors, we've got serious cocks, but only Russia can do nothing together. This can be explained very simply: this is the Gnostic-Chassar interest, so they keep Poles in emotional strengthening, which makes rational reasoning very hard for us. A number of alien pretending to be theirs, deployed in different areas of the state, are helping.

Historical experiences are not a determination for the future, and present Russia is not the russian Union, but Russia's return, profoundly mutilated, first by Bolshevik communism, then by russian socialism, and yet by the sadness of the oligarch's chaos of the times of Yeltyn. Russia is recovering, returning to its imperial policy. The state of this size is an empire due to the fact that it must be. There is no area for the chaos of Western democracy. To insult Russia for being Russia is like to offend a wolf, to be a predator. That does not mean, however, that he must take everything within his reach. Any strategy to be functional must have a fixed growth limit.

Every territorial advancement by conquering another state and nation has a immense cost. The military operation itself is simply a large logistical cost, connected with the organization and relocation of the army and providing its supply. The costs and losses associated with the fight against defenders are the next position in the Buchalteria. However, this would not be the most difficult, but at the minute there are no armies in Europe that would be able to halt the winning march of the Russian troops if the state decided for a real full-scale war. Conquest of Europe, or at least its central part, would not be an excessive effort for Russia. The real effort and costs would only begin if Russia wanted to occupy the conquered Poland. It has been, and has always been a problem for this country. Eventually, Stalin decided that it was better not to occupy Poland, but to keep in the vassal dependence. This is how we survived the Polish People's Republic, and after 1989, it changed so much that we became the vassal of the West, which seeks our liquidation.

The arguments that Russia falls as a consequence of Ukrainian war and Western sanctions, utilized by Ukrainian supporters, attest to ignorance. It is clear that the Russian authorities are fighting a war of demolition without engaging their main resources. The West sends its supplies and weapons there, worth billions, disposing of reserves and charging the economy with debt. Russia first of all disposes of old equipment and develops its production base.

The Russian Federation's army could easy halt the transportation of material to Ukraine, break supply lines and electrocute command centers. However, he does not do so, allowing the forces of the West and the material and human resources of Ukraine to be burned down. This generates advanced costs for Russia, but they are calculated in Russia's regaining the position of an independent empire. Ukraine is simply a pearl for Russia in the imperial crown, so Moscow will not quit Kiev, especially as Ukraine, belonging to the enemies of Russia is always a strategical threat to this country. So let us not delude ourselves, the Ukrainian war is not a war of Ukraine for its freedom, but a fight of Russia for strategical security, and the eventual goal of Russia's policy towards Ukraine is to completely subordinate Kiev Moscow. Poland has no power to halt this process, and even more, has no interest in it.

Ukrainian problem

Ukraine as an independent state is now impossible. Either it will be subject to Russia, or to the West, or in Gnostic practice to the Chazars, and they will usage this state and its resources to accomplish aggressive goals, just as they usage the tiny Chazarsian state. 1 of the constant goals of the gnostics is to destruct Poland and Poles, so the state will be used, governed by the government in Kiev. For the Chazars, the life of their subjects is not important, the more they will not regret ours. Therefore, it is crucial to treat the Ukrainian state as a serious threat to Poland, the greater, the more formally independent it will be. Ukrainians presently have no chance to effectively manage their country, primarily due to the deficiency of strong national identity and systemic traditions.

The only strong feeling that a part of the population of this country can connect is flagism, not so much a national feeling, but an anti-Polish one. The past of Polish-Ukrainian contacts after 1991 clearly shows their unilaterality. On the 1 hand, large Polish kindness and investments in Ukraine and Ukrainians, on the another hand hostility, contempt, arrogance and endless claims and threats from Ukraine. For Poland, Ukraine, managed by Chazarian gnostics, is besides a trunk without bottom and bottomless abyss. The Ukrainian State will be an enemy of the Polish State, unless Poland would be so strong that it would dominate Ukraine politically and militarily, which is not available at the moment.

The Ukrainian State will not be left to itself after the war, but will be protected. Protectorate can be German, American or Russian. They are all risky for us due to the fact that they always give protectors the chance to usage Ukraine against Poland. The German protectorate would be the worst for us. (EU means the same), Then this usage would be certain. The American protectorate would give specified usage a probability, the Russian protectorate too, but at the same time would be able to destruct flagism. So any eventuality of the Ukrainian State is either a direct or possible threat to Poland. Wise conduct is about good relations with all neighbors. Good relations with Ukraine mean a safe border, the end of free support of this country, the return of the majority of Ukrainians to their homeland, the express and enforced demands of Poles of common viability, continuous blackmail from Poland of closing the border for people and goods. Ukraine needs to be disciplined very rigorously, and the fundamental condition for any further contacts should be the request for complete debanderization and full exhumation and burial of murdered Poles. Only after that can you talk to them about anything in partnership.

New alliances

Good relations with Russia are as possible, and the hazard of attack on the part of Russia is little than Ukrainian risks. Russia is not planning to invade Western Europe, it's a propaganda of gnostics. Russia doesn't pay off, nor does it cover any strategical plans. At the same time, Russia's attack on Poland is probable today, but due to an aggressive policy of power in Warsaw, acting on behalf of the West, under the control of gnostics. The authorities of the Polish state behave aggressively and provocatively towards the atomic power and the world's largest state, which cannot be overcome from the outside. This behaviour is highly irresponsible and exposes Poland to a Russian retaliation attack. At the same time, the Chazar-Gnostic propaganda in Poland claims that we must arm ourselves to defend ourselves against aggressive Russia. To this end, Poland is forced to spend a large deal of budget, to burden the economy and no real benefits. In another words, we provoke Russia, we arm Ukraine, we spend quite a few money and we have nothing for it. The contracted American and Korean weapons we'll most likely get someday, and we won't be able to usage them without American permission. So we are now in a fictional reality, surviving the delusions that our enemies have told us to do, and we do not even know. but for those who read this study.

Good neighbourly relations do not mean subjection. In this sense, our current relations with Germany are not good neighbourly, due to the fact that they are based on our submission. Good relations with your neighbour besides mean assertiveness. 1 must be able to refuse erstwhile a neighbour wishes for the night of our wife or daughter. Throughout III of Poland, the Polish state could not deny anything to any neighbours, and the origin was the anti-Polish government policy in Poland. It will only be possible for the Polish State to establish any alliances if there is simply a permanent sovereign power in Poland, representing a nation, not external organizers; a power, conducting a pro-Polish policy, not an anti-Polish one; a power aiming at a free Poland, not a dependent Ucrocoline. It's a prerequisite.

When this condition is met, then, based on the cognition contained in this study, fresh alliances should be established or old ones renewed. The general rule of any alliance is very simple: they must pay for Poland and Poles. all alliance must be realistic, not idealistic, giving measurable benefits not only immediate but besides long-term. Our current alliance with the West assumes that we must defend ourselves against the attack on Russia, and NATO and the EU warrant us safety under these conditions. This presumption is based on 2 errors. Firstly, the Russian threat is exaggerated, secondly, the West will not defend us. However, fresh assumptions must be added, which were not yet known in the early 21st century. The alliance with the West is expensive, risky, and brings us more sorrow than benefits. Participation in the EU is simply a certainty of bankruptcy and slavery, and the US withdraws their safety guarantees for Europe. At the same time, China is curious in the fresh Silk Road, which gives Poland tangible benefits and Russia has proved to be a country immune to destabilisation and crises. All the major Western states, guaranteeing Poland's safety within NATO are not sovereign, their external policy is controlled remotely, and interior is suicide. The West is economically rolling and the BRICS group is developing. At the same time, we inactive request Western states, especially America, but not to hang ourselves on their doorknob. We request them to counterbalance the alliance with the East, as well as as as a power capable of suppressing the future political and military claims of the Prussian Empire, which present is Germany. present it seems abstract, but Germany can arm itself again and, after the EU's breakup, can return to the military force to the East, which will be Poland. The U.S. is so inactive needed as our enemy's occupier and as an chance to choose strategical geopolitical alliances. As long as we are dependent on 1 of the parties, who is our safety monopoly, we will not be respected. Monopolist doesn't respect a client he's addicted to himself, but 1 he has to pursue. The warrant of respecting Polish interests both through the East and through the West will be only balancing between and winning common contradictions. In no case can Poland become completely subordinate to 1 of the blocks.