The state of Temida after 1989, in this unfinished III of the Republic of Poland, inactive clearly illustrates that the present judiciary (also the prosecution) originates in a consecutive line from the corrupted Communists after 1945 of the judiciary. It then became a dimension of absolute injustice, or actually "legal" terror, which was a tool for oppressing the Stalinist regime. The pre-war justice strategy was deformed to service the judicial execution committed in Poles not agreeing to the ideology of communism and to Sovietization. Without specified a deformation of Themida, it would not be possible to impose on society absurd Marxism and alien ideology. They are Stalinist criminals and unlearned after courses of “law” specified as Stefan Michnik or polytruds like Igor Andreyev destroyed our regulation of law immediately after the war, dozens of them are described by 2 volumes of “Beast” by Tadeusz M. Płużański. Their sinister activities in the “courts” and in the bloodthirsty prosecutor's office were supported by hundreds of executioners from the UB, who, in violation of fundamental human rights, abused patriots from the AK, unbreakable soldiers and Polish youth. This was the genesis of the Polish People's Republic and its organs of terror, which shaped the inhuman dimension of “justice” and, in fact, the dimension of lawlessness, bastardity and savagery. Among these "wild beasts" at the head of this Stalinist squad were the mentioned "professor" Andreev, Teodor Duracz, Jakub Berman, Luna Brystygierowa, or the "professor" Bauman, then a political officer and a military information agent, where he besides acted (as Ps. Wolski) General Jaruzelski, a future executioner of "Solidarity".
After 1956, this dimension of lawlessness was only somewhat corrected, always bent to service the interests of the regime. And after 1989 – after a short period of mild verification of prosecutors – the "returning wave" began in 1991, so the Themida was not truly healed. Therefore, the EU is completely incorrect in accusing the Government of the Law of Law and Justice of ...the misdemeanor of the regulation of law, due to the fact that it was never in the Polish People's Republic, nor in the III Republic, known e.g. from a protective umbrella over affairs or from unlawful persecution of businessmen who were not in the deal. Conversely, the Law and Justice Government tried to heal the alleged “justice” dimension, inactive affected by corruption and lawlessness. The judges – according to Prof. A. Strzembosz – were to settle for themselves (!?), which, of course, never happened. On the contrary, this extraordinary and unpunished caste even strengthened its privileges. Therefore, Jarosław Kaczyński in his book “Poland of Our Dreams” (Lublin, Akpit 2011) published the chapter “Judgery or the condition of a just Poland...” (p.100-104), reads: “With courts in Poland there is simply a problem that they are in fact corporations beyond strict control. This is simply a phenomenon of the progressive expansion of their competences and the increasingly progressive jurisdiction of social life. That means the courts are expanding their power. The judges became a fresh priestly group.... Everything has been done so that democratic mechanisms can change as small as possible. (...) All this creates a continuation of the old regime.. . There was no selection related to attitudes from the PRL period, this environment was not cleared. The worst judges of the martial law, if they did not leave themselves, remained. Many of the judges have gone out of business, become lawyers. They began to make very good money, making it easier for them to associate in courts. There was besides a quasi-corruption mechanism, if not a strict corruption sense. The disciplinary courts do not deal with this, they are very much fiction. Furthermore, decisions to waive immunity are made by court assemblies, which are based on common loyalty. And loyalty is very strong here. This resulted in a pathological strategy that was simultaneously subject to overload. There was another component – accommodative. In 1989, people of the old strategy were definitely dominant in the courts. Then the question arose about their premise in the fresh system. Then Adam Michnik and “Gazeta Wyborcza” gave these judges their hand... (Michnik even went to the trial of the zombies guilty of the death of miners in the mine "Uncle" and demanded low sentences! – the addition of M.B.), and these judges were accommodated by reading and reasoning this "Gazeta" and by a liberal reaction to the repressiveness of the commune. This resulted in mild sentences and an unprecedented dissolution of criminals. A uniquely poisonous mixture was formed, due to the fact that on the 1 hand it is immune to all types of pathologies, poorly resistant to corruption, and resistant to pressures of correctness. Unthinkable concepts of the communist period..., introduced into the democratic system, led to imposibilism. And present we are dealing with a situation where the citizen is completely helpless in front of the court. And the court may not usage it if it is decent, but it can usage it in someone's interest if it is someway ‘connected’. The law begins to lose its primary function." (J. Kaczyński, p. 100-103).
Jarosław Kaczyński's observations, published in 2011, unfortunately did not lose their validity erstwhile we continued to deal with the purification of the extraordinary caste from the martial law judges, which the EU pointed out to us. On what principle? After all, there should not be any judges' nominations from the Polish People's Republic of Poland! Earlier, the draft of the repoma met and with the veto of president Duda, who had kind of left the PiS government, covering the opinion of Mrs. Romaszewski, having a master's degree in ... physics. This is ridiculous. Duda besides referred to the opinions of certain authorities, but the sense of veto clearly indicated that he was under force from the post-peerel arrangement. Unfortunately, after the 2017 vetoe, she stood in place of the improvement of Poland in the field of Themids, and the veto itself was a blow to Good Change. More and more politicians and publicists point to the President, not only Patrick Jaka and M. Karnowski. On the margins of Kaczyński's comments in the chapter "Judgery or the Condition of Justice ..." it should be added that they are confirmed by voices from another sources, specified as the statements of lawyers "unbreakable", who see twisted practices, utilized by the guardians of the system, who lead applicants to the profession of judge. Indeed, after 1989, in the process of accomodation (also called co-optation), future judges were paid more attention to the political "sciences" of the "Electoral Gazette" than to the purely legal cognition of applicants. Thus, the extraordinary caste of judges, inherited from the Polish People's Republic, continued to corrupt the judge's fish, this time not from the instructions of the KC PZPR, but from the recommendations of the editorial board of Adam Michnik, who did not care to purify Themid and who even sought to keep the corrupt profile of the judge's caste. All of this in the interests of the post-peerelist arrangement and affairers, and for any time in the interests of certain ideologies or pro-abortion movements that number on the care of corrupt courts. On the another hand, the improvement of the Law and Justices meant that courts should be independent (this is an crucial feature of democracy!), but besides free from corruption.
After 1945, the justice strategy in Poland was destroyed, as only the lawlessness provided for the imposition of Marxism and sovietisation. Today, the EU does not want to repair Temida in Poland, as this corrupt dimension of “justice” can be useful for foundations spreading new, post-Marxian foundations, ideologies and can besides service the interests of abroad possible in our territory. In conclusion, 1 must constantly remember that the justice strategy was destroyed immediately after 1945, as only the application of lawlessness allowed Poland to impose the ideology of communism, for which lawlessness was the first "value" and the only warrant of the continuation of the dictatorship of the PZPR. This is to be reminded, due to the fact that EU propaganda and perfidious calums of activists about-PO-positions (or even "lost" professors from the agreement) preach lies about the fact that it is PiS and Jarosław Kaczyński ...psuli regulation of law and destruct the state of law which has not yet been and inactive is not! due to the fact that it died after 1945, and after 1989 it was not restored. This was not allowed by the post-communist arrangement dictating conditions at the circular table. And the written attempts to heal the regulation of law interrupted the unfortunate result of the 2023 elections, due to the fact that despite the triumph of the Law and Justice, only 35 Members of Parliament were missing. Since December 2023, this unfinished state of law has been demolished again, or has actually become a state of lawlessness. This was pointed out by president Duda in a large parliamentary message (16.X.2024), but what next? So Slovak is right: “Behold, they are risen, but cannot cast off the graves” ... And without restoring respect for the regulation of law, there is inactive a swamp of continuity and a strong limping democracy. This state has been visible since Donald Tusk's return to the position of Prime Minister in December 2023. I don't think I gotta remind anyone of a series of law enforcement assassinations we've witnessed since the raid on public tv and the media. The series ended with the death of innocent Mrs Barbara Skrzypek, whose only “guilty” was the fact that she erstwhile worked at the office of president Kaczyński. Bequeathed by the prosecutor (called illegally as president Duda or late Prof. Jan Majchrowski on tv Republic) can not even be mentioned publically without a disturbance on the part of the coalition on 13 December as we saw late in the Sejm, erstwhile a passionate MP of the PO threw insults at Kaczyński. He even dared to accuse the president of the Law and Justice (so he repeats lies sucked out of Tusk's finger as well as fabricated texts about the guilt of pilots over Smolensk!) to end his tirade with an arrogant "diagnosis" that the president has a mentality of... PRL?! On the contrary, this calumny and aggression testify, rather, that it was this PO MP who infiltrated the PRL, as well as Holownia, who interrupted president Kaczyński's speech on the late Barbara Skrzypek case. These scenes show the deep illness that the Peerelians endure from, who occupy the Sejm and take it from Poles. And they resurrected the PRL in the worst version as if from Bierut's time. And they push people of conscience, or PiS, whom John Paul II prayed in Skoczów and who tried to resurrect Poland, to clear her of the relics of the Polish People's Republic of Poland. And present these relics of the Polish People's Republic abuse Jarosław Kaczyński, and in 2010 they killed his brother due to the fact that he was the only president without a TW folder and attempted to halt the expansion of the Russian empire in Georgia. However, Poles did not forget this, although the "lawfulness" during the word of the PO-PSL did not let to explain to the end the Smolensk tragedy. And the regulation of law in 2015-2023 was not yet strong adequate to do so formally, although the committee of independent experts identified the real causes of the “catastrophe”.
Today, on the another hand, it is simply a disaster that the regulation of law has fallen enormously since December 2023, and it is this collapse of rights that Prof. Jan Majchrowski (former justice of the SN) spoke about on tv a fewer days ago in a conversation with Adrian Stankowski, and that it is the "repairing" of the regulation of law by Tusk and bodnarization that resembles ... a wheel break! Both gentlemen stressed the fact that the legal barriers were being crossed, so Tusk's instructions (from Berlin) ruin the basis for the regulation of law and Prof. Majchrowski rightly warns that Poland is demolishing itself in all dimensions and that the coalition of 13 December seeks to resolve the Polish state in the interests of the EU. And the restoration of the regulation of law can only take place after the removal of this "government". It is truly worth listening to this momentous conversation, drawing attention to our communicative – so ignored by the Tusk mafia – and it turns out that already in 1430 King Władysław Jagiello gave the law to Nemin captivabimus nisi jure Victum (We will not trap anyone without a court sentence), so in the era of the monarchy Poles had more democracy than for a "fighting democracy" (unless smoke-cracies!) Tuska and Bodnar. In addition to this dialog of 2 just people, it is besides worth listening on tv to a conversation with Dr. Artur Bartoszewicz, who perorates as if from the box of ridiculers and warns that erstwhile the PO closes the strategy in the event of the win of Trzaskowski, in Poland demands of Brussels will be introduced with apparent harm to us and to future generations. And with the right sarcasm Bartoszewicz advises to sew... safety jackets for specified characters as Bodnar, Kalisz or Prime Minister Tusk. . So I advise you to perceive to this conversation, and all this must be before the presidential election, which will take place on May 18, so on the birthday of Karol Wojtyła! And it is He, John Paul II, who should be the first inspiration for our choices after careful analysis of the situation. So let us vote for Nawrocki from the IPN, a candidate of citizens and PiS, who will save Poland, Poland and our national interests, I will not mention that past and tradition, due to the fact that it is most likely all Pole carrying in his backpack, unlike the Peerelians. On 18 May we must save Poland, while prof. Jan Majchrowski invites the patriots in Warsaw to march on 12 April!
Marek Baterovich
