Washington has decided, without the EU, that Ukraine is losing not only its territory

Video in Russian with a wide discussion in Polish.

Trump offers Ukraine peace in exchange for territory. This is not a spontaneous response, but a confidential agreement with Putin on the outline of the peace treaty.

Trump besides made a message that Ukraine will never become a NATO member.

To rub tears, she sacrifices Ukraine something like Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty. But not from NATO., but individual countries that would like to agree to it.

Editor's Note: For any astonishing reason, no of the “distinguished leaders of NATO and the EU have bothered to read Article 5 in its entirety, which has been over 75 years since it was written. That's why I quote him here:

‘Article 5

The Parties agree that an armed assault on 1 or more of them in Europe or North America will be deemed to constitute an assault against all of them and so agree that if specified armed assault occurs, each of them, in the exercise of the right to individual or collective self-defense recognised under Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the organization or Parties assaulted by taking, without delay, and in agreement with the another Parties, the action he considers necessary, including the usage of armed forces, in order to reconstruct and keep the safety of the North Atlantic area.

Any specified armed assault and any measures taken as a consequence thereof shall be notified without hold to the safety Council. specified measures shall be abandoned as shortly as the safety Council takes the essential measures to reconstruct and keep global peace and security."

Article 5

The Parties agree that an armed attack against 1 or more of them in Europe or North America Shall be hosted an attack against them all and considerably they agree that, if specified an armed attack attacks, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence has been identified by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the organization or Parts so attached by taking abroad, individually and in performance with the another Parties, specified action as it deems necessary, including the usage of armed force, to reconstruct and keep the safety of the North Atlantic area.

Any specified armed attack and all means taken as a consequence thereof Shall immediately be reported to the safety Council. specified measures Shall be specified erstwhile the safety Council has taken the means essential to reconstruct and keep global peace and security.

You don’t request to be a dry lawyer to decently interpret: “the activities it considers necessary, including the usage of armed forces.’ The site may confine itself to praying for the assaulted and thus meet the requirements of this celebrated article!

https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_17120.htm

On the another hand, Ursula Ursula von der Leyen offers a possible EU membership if Ukraine makes territorial concessions.

At the Zełenski press conference again hard: no territorial concessions, due to the fact that the constitution does not allow! But then he adds: but we can “freeze” the border on the current front line, which full satisfies the EU and the US.

However, in case Zelenski insists, Trump has a plan B, signing the treaty together with the EU, without Ukrainian participation.

EU leaders have besides many interior problems to further support Ukraine against Washington's will. And the spines never did, bending where they needed to be, although the rhetoric was precisely the opposite.

From the point of view of Ukraine, this is simply a betrayal of the Union. But erstwhile did the West fulfill its obligations and declarations that are harmful to them? Never!

The question follows: with whom will Ukraine remain? Looks like she's alone.

If the treaty is signed without Ukraine's participation, it will become global law subject matter, not subject.

And it's not a theory, it's a fact. They are inactive discussing words in Brussels, while they are already writing a treaty in Washington.

Trump says straight on his blog: “Ukraine must go to territorial concessions, otherwise it will lose more!”

As you can see, the invitation of “EU leaders” along with Zelenski to talks in Washington, D.C., was a euphemism to hide their necessity to comply with the White House's will!

Rumors from Washington say that the U.S. and Russia have agreed not only about boundaries, but besides about that who is to become the next “president of independent Ukraine”.

Geopolitics is changing, now Washington and Moscow decide global issues.

For Trump, it is not only a victory, but besides the main function in the show, in which he is besides a manager and screenwriter. He wants his name associated in the past books with the end of the war, fresh safety architecture and a fresh form of Ukraine.

What is being created now is not negotiating, but searching for the most convenient face for full defeat.

"European leaders", as a sign of the conductor, changed the song. Now they no longer sing, “for justice to the last Ukrainian!” but “We all want peace!”

Trump is moving this case not in political but business form. Like a merger of corporations (USA & RF).

For the EU, a compromise with unchangeable east rungs is better than a vague turbulence future.

If past goes as planned, the three-year bloody war will not be titled "the triumph of good over evil," but "the arrangement between the 2 powers."

The word ‘capitulation” is not used, but if diplomatic narratives are removed, it remains.