The Sejm has decided. In vitro with our taxes

pro-life.pl 1 year ago

Members of the Parliament of the 10th word of office decided by a majority that fertilisation through an in vitro method would be covered by financial support from budgetary resources. The Act assumes that at least PLN 500 million will be allocated annually.

The bill was adopted by 268 votes against 118. 50 Members abstained. The bill was supported by MPs of KO, Left, Poland 2050 and PSL clubs, 23 members of the Law and 2 MPs of Kukiz’15. Among the Members who abstained there were 49 PiS and 1 Kukiz’15. The opposition was 108 PiS MPs and the Confederate Club. Among the Members who abstained there were 49 PiS and 1 Kukiz’15.

According to erstwhile statements, opposition leaders, i.e. Donald Tusk, Włodzimierz Czarzaty, Szymon Hołownia and Władysław Kosiniak-Kamish, gave their support to the bill. Additionally, Marek Jakubiak and Paweł Kukiz voted “for”. An interesting issue is the analysis of the distribution of votes in the Law and Justice Parliamentary Club (PiS).

The civic task on in vitro was supported by Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki, Vice-President of PiS Mariusz Kamiński, as well as celebrated MPs, as erstwhile organization spokesperson Radosław Fogiel, current spokesperson Rafal Bochenek and MPs Joanna Lichock and Olga Semenuk-Patkowska. Members of the Sovereign Poland led by the president of this organization Zbigniew Ziobro and, among others, Minister of improvement Marlena Maląg – 108 MPs – spoke against the bill.

Voting by rotation call.

Members of PiS, who voted in favour of the adoption of the Act "TAK for in vitro": Dorota Arcziewska-Mielewczyk, Rafał Bochenek, Waldemar Buda, Krzysztof Ciecióra, Janusz Cieczinski, Przemysław Drabek, Magdalena Filipek-Sobczak, Radosław Fogiel, Norbert Jakub Kaczmarczyk, Mariusz Kamiński, Joanna Lichocka, Daniel Milewski, Mateusz Morawiecki, Michał Moskal, Piotr Müller, Marcin Ociepa, Anna Pieczarka, Marcin Przywocz, Olga Ewa Semenuk-Patkowska, Agnieszka Anna Soin, Katarzyna Sójka, Artur Szaławawka, Sylwester Tulayev,

Politicians from PiS who abstained were, among others, organization president Jarosław Kaczyński, PiS club head Mariusz Błaszczak, agriculture minister Anna Gembicka and organization vice-president Urszula Rusecka. Notable Members – specified as Marek Suski, Jacek Sasin, Łukasz Schreiber and Waldemar Andzel – besides abstained.

The debate in the parliament on the bill was 1 large in vitro advertising under the slogan “Let people be happy”. It is worth reminding that the Act does not introduce fresh in vitro law in Poland. Now it is not whether it is legal or not, for whom it is allowed – nothing has changed. The financing of the State budget is being changed and thus scope and availability.

On the 1 hand, it is good that there was area in the parliament for the presented doubts about in vitro, but as we can see, presently fewer people are curious in substantive debate. It's all about emotion.

He was 8 years old to present arguments against the Law and Justice. The question is, did the rulers do anything to aid marriages incapable to conceive a child? What government program has been implemented to make protective procreative medicine that truly heals and gives a chance to return fertility? That is simply a bitter conclusion that unfortunately must come to pass.

In vitro is presented as "giving happiness" to those who have the alleged "right" to a child. However, online forums show the dramatic stories of unhappy parents who wonder what will happen to their frozen children.

There's a reflection that it's not just any tissue, but their own baby. They wanted one, but what happens to the other, the third, that waits frozen at almost minus 200 degrees C? This is just 1 of the many dilemmas parents will face. And there will be even more problems due to the fact that we are incapable to foretell all the in vitro effects that will appear in later generations.

In view of the communicative that proclaims “the right to a child” for everyone, the average man, it is hard to realize what is the wickedness of insemination. The shortest answer could be that the dignity of man, including the unborn, cannot be devoted to the desire to have a child.

Although in vitro children are created outside their mother's body, from the first moments of their lives on the Petri dish they have the inalienable and inviolable dignity of a human person. After all, their life has already begun and is as full as the life of children born naturally! They enjoy all human rights, especially the most crucial of them – the right to life and development. Unfortunately, it is violated at many stages of the in vitro procedure, which is inextricably associated with embryo segregation and the death of many of them.

Only 7.5% of human embryos formed by artificial insemination are born alive. (American Society for Reproduction Medicine). Born children have an increased hazard of chromosomal disorders, including Turner syndrome, Edwards syndrome, Down syndrome and another genetic diseases. At least 9 percent of children conceived in vitro are born with severe heart defects, oesophageal growth, lip divided and palate, defects in the improvement of the genitourinary strategy in boys. In children conceived in vitro, up to 5 years of age, almost twice as many surgical procedures as in children conceived naturally. These are just any of the observed illness risks in children conceived in vitro.

In vitro is besides not indifferent to mother’s health. There is an increased hazard of ectopic, duplicate and multifertile pregnancy and abortion. another complications include premature labor, inhibition of intrauterine growth. A advanced proportion of pregnancy after in vitro ends with an imperial cut, and women are more frequently depressed. After hormonal stimulation, there is an increased incidence of ovarian, breast or molar tumours in women over the next 15 years.

These facts are not arguments against individuals conceived in vitro. It is an appeal to respect the fundamental right to life and improvement of each of us. besides the smallest ones. It is besides an appeal to take the fertility treatment programme seriously at government level.

JB, MN

Read Entire Article