Second War

I find the situation most disturbing. However, we should not do anything due to the fact that the situation is unfavourable:

Israel:

- I'm sorry. Israel has concrete demands for us, possibly even 2 trillion (European trillions) of gold reaching,

- as a consequence of the above, it conducts a polonaphobic policy, acting exscisely,

- Prime Minister Netanyahu has his ears too,

- trips of the youth to Poland caused a number of scandals,

- with hatred mention to our there, e.g. monks,

- they have an atom.

Palestine:

- there are no circumstantial questions to us (Iran too),

- there's no atom.

Therefore, we should not make any declarations or do anything unless in return for something. First they come to us and ask. possibly they don't want any statements at all. Let the declaration of Israel come with circumstantial attachments and not with declarations, but with concrete actions to appease us with the undoing of the effects, which are negative for us, of the above. Palestine can besides come with any proposals, equally specific. But they think we're America's stooges, so they're not coming.

If no 1 comes, we do nothing, seemingly they don't request our support, we have more crucial things to worry about. But for our power - which will begin unbridled snouting before the elections - this is besides hard matter. They must fight for the universal moral order. Which will make them slip out again like Ukrainian grain.

**

Nobody (nearly nobody) will tell you the reasons for this crisis. For example, it is hard to find on Wikipedia information about the population of judaic people in Palestine in early 19th century:

]]>https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obligation_]]>Jewish_Palestine

There's just a small bit of a mystery:

Old Jishuw refers to all Jews surviving in Palestine before the Ally[3] launched in 1882 by the Zionist movement[4]. Old Jishuw's men were orthodox Jews surviving most frequently in Jerusalem, Safed, Tiberias and Hebron. tiny communities were in Jafa, Haifa, Peki’in, Akka and Nablus. Most of them focused on studying the Torah. They continued with the financial assistance of the Jews from the diaspora.

At the very beginning of the 19th century, there were practically no Jews in Palestine and they won't tell you why? No 1 specifically prohibited them from surviving there outside the Talmud: the commandments of the Talmud are divided into those of Palestine and not those of Palestine. These binding Jews surviving in Palestine were so burdensome that they practically prevented average living. Ask any scorner behind Israel and you'll see what he tells you. It is crucial that you realize that you cannot live in Palestine. Since the 19th century they have already been able and started to slide together and here we are putting the fundamental issue:

What about the effort to change the national structure of a given area from 0% to 100% target?

And how can this be achieved? If they had bought the locals by offering advanced prices for the property, there would have been half the poverty. Meanwhile, we have a situation as if the Irish stated that erstwhile the Celts inhabited Poland, so they are besides Celts, so Poles are inflowing and won from Poland. Wouldn't we be defending ourselves? They did. Or a UFO arrives and says that it lived here a billion years ago and the Earth won from Earth.

Next: we request to find what state of affairs we recognise there: There is simply a State of Israel that we recognise but within the limits of 1966, don't we? It occupies the alleged West Bank of Jordan and something else, I think. We do not respect this area as part of Israel. And that's why it's crucial to find out where they fight? As in the occupied lands, not in Israel. And as in Israel, that means they've moved action to the enemy's territory.

**

As you carefully look at the map, you will see that the plan to establish a fresh judaic state in Palestine had any weaknesses. The first are autochthons who may not like it. Others are neighbors whose favour they have forgotten to pursue. They're sitting on a powder keg anyway. It's not like they were forced to.

The galloping Major here shared the thought on Xsa that the judaic state should arise after the war separated from the German territories. For example, East Prussia has 36,000 km2 of land and the State of Israel has 20,000 km2 and it would be even better. But they didn't want to. They wanted Palestine. At the same time, the postulated boundaries in the Old Testament are from the Nile to the Euphrates (so many inactive ahead). And in Jesus' day they had only Judea and Galilee, and in it was Samaria--not them. The conclusion is that, as Zagłoba rightly said, Israel can win 100 battles and the Arabs win 1 100 first and the end. We should declare that we will not recognise this and that we will send out all now and then condemning resolutions of the UN. That's all they can number on. European countries have late acquired many groups of Palestinian supporters and will wash their hands in order to avoid any further interior disturbance. Israel woke up the demon and scares us that this demon will eat us if we don't aid him. But it can count. Our luminaries think it's adequate that they're nice, so they're nice. And all these are misunderstandings.

If illegal settlements in occupied areas were replaced by legal ones, utilizing even forced expropriation for dense compensation, we would have spoken differently.

The Arabs in turn were incapable to win any of the fewer wars. And whose responsibility is that? Not ours.

In conclusion, don't be fooled that individual has an thought of how to end it. I guess only the colonization of the cosmos will aid if any of the population moves to luxury colonies to the moon. The 3rd planet War in front of us has gained a fresh outbreak of fighting.

In the photo: The wall separating Israel from the occupied territories.

PS: If individual wants to dialectically point out that due to the fact that Iran has no stakes for us and has to the US it has to us too, let alone comment.