The ex-wife of the esbek confident, Barbara Engelking – Boni, traditionally claims that the Jews were not helped during the war. The outrage, nevertheless right, should not obscure to us the fact that since a certain Gross saw a gesheft in the humiliation of Poles, the alleged judaic Historical Institute is trying to exposure the expected anti-Semickness of our Nation.
Cthe message maintained mainly by the Polish payer "scienceoffcuff" hits the grotesque.
A friend of Mrs. Boni's. Andrzej Żbikowski ZIH:
In Poland, about 20 1000 Jews survived the Nazi business thanks to the aid of Poles. But that's a lot little than it seemed. 2 or 3 times more Jews from Poland survived in concentration camps. The most effective endurance strategy was the concentration camp, since about mid-1944 the gas chambers were no longer functioning, due to the fact that the Germans needed people to work.
It's mine.
Which is what? The concentration camps were really... protective, where the German soldiers tried to supply shelter for the Jews who were susceptible to death, terrified of the cruelty of the Polish peasantry?
As for Barbara Boni herself...
The Times of Israel published an article by Aron Heller discussing Barbara Engelking's book from the Center for Holocaust investigation of Jews of the Institute of doctrine and Sociology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, "There is specified a beautiful sunny day". According to the author of the article, "Polish historian presented evidence concerning frequent cases of killing of Jews fleeing Nazis during planet War II among the Polish agrarian population". This extended quote is essential to show how to formulate also, both the author of the book and its recipients. due to the fact that it is simply a way of spreading lies and misinformation.
By paper commentator B. Engelking she was considered further distant from Jan Tomasz Gross. Paradoxically, A. Heller admits that Gross is simply a sociologist, so not a historian. But if so, then his thesis, included, among others, in the infamous and manipulative facts of the book Neighbours, cannot be regarded as historical findings, but only sociological divactions and hypotheses. However, this does not prevent Heller from saying that Engelking's book "is a powerful accusation of Poles' engagement [in the Holocaust – mic], which will now scope a much wider audience". He besides takes a quote from Engelking himself, who stated that “Polish peasants murdered Jews as volunteers.” This full argument, or alternatively the interplay of quotes by the author of the book and the author of the article, is an excuse to attack the current "nationalist Polish government" which "may irritate these studies". Let's go 1 at a time.
In the English version of the article, distributed, among others, in the UK, it was written about a prominent Polish historian (A prominent Polish historian). Meanwhile, Barbara Engelking is not and was never a historian. She graduated in psychology, after which she obtained a PhD in humanities sciences, and the habilitation work she performed in cultural sociology. It's not an accusation, it's an effort to explain why it was preached by B. Engelking views and arrangements cannot be considered reliable and historically reliable. The difference in the workshop of a historian and scientist or sociologist is apparent to everyone, and the treatment of works in the field of psychology or sociology as a origin of documented historical works would lead to a mess, comparable to, for example, that caused years ago the imposition of the past of Marxist explanation of history. Undoubtedly, any of the information presented by B. Engelking may be an interesting reason or starting point for historical research, but provided that appropriate criticism of sources and their interpretations in accordance with the canons of historical discipline are carried out. As in the case of J. T. Gross, the improvement of B. Engelking, after verifying the sources of information and the veracity of the relationship, can be considered as a voice in discussions on individual human attitudes in utmost situations. However, in no way can it be considered as historical material and a origin to conclude or synthesize history.
According to Heller, the author of the book “reviews the government version of past tirelessly”. The problem is that unlike the State of Israel, there is no government version of past in Poland, nor even a coherent historical policy, which has allowed so far many dilettants or even counterfeiters to impose charges against Poles. possibly that's why the current government was targeted at the B. Engelking Heller and various anti-Polish centers that declare their willingness to change this state of affairs. But from a declaration to the implementation of a historical policy under the Law and Justice, unfortunately, it is inactive a long way to go.
In turn, B. Engelking herself claims that although people think she should be afraid, she is not afraid due to the fact that she is only telling the truth. The point is, if it's actual Barbara Engelking, it doesn't make sense, however, to be strictly historical. And for telling the truth, no 1 in Poland will most likely talk at you, so mythomania and authoreklamy is simply a mistake. Never before have investigation enjoyed more freedom in Poland than under the current power. So, as far as the fact and the good of discipline are concerned, Mrs Engelking may indeed feel full secure.
Unfortunately, in their desire to "slight" as revealing as controversial, B. Engelking preaches many nonsense, specified as that "The righteous acted not only against German law, but besides against their neighbours, against the prevailing atmosphere, contrary to common sense anti-Semitism (emphasis – mic)". Here, among others, we can see the difference between the sociologist's workshop, which analyses the phenomenon or attitude frequently alienated from the envelope, and the historian who examines and verifies the full circumstance. For the historian, it is apparent that in the rescue of each individual Jew, the most common part was the full chain of these righteous ones, and frequently full families, of which only individuals received the authoritative award in the form of the formal name "The Righteous" and appropriate medal. Meanwhile, B. Engelking not only assumes that all case of negative attitude towards Jews is actual and proven, but that examples of affirmative attitudes reject and marginalize. At the same time, he suggests to Poles this collective “healthy-reasonable anti-Semitism”. And that's pure water manipulation, just like Gross.
If negative attitudes among the Polish society happened, they belonged to the margin. Undoubtedly, the war besides favoured various perversions and degenerations, and the “educational system” applied to Poles by German occupiers only deepened these pathologies. The problem is, that alongside the moneymakers from the Polish criminal margin, the same judaic groups were operating, catching escapees from ghettos. At the services of the German gendarmerie and Gestapo there were many hundreds of judaic confidents and provokers who released between Polish society gathered information who helped He's willing to aid Jews or even help. In addition to Polish bandit groups – most frequently under the leadership of communists, e.g. Stefan Kilanowicz (later the People's General Grzegorz Korczyński), judaic groups operated. They besides looted and murdered both Jews and Poles. And very frequently especially Poles saving Jews. The researcher, who does not know about specified basic elements, forgets them, or, worse, rejects them, due to the fact that they do not match the pre-established thesis, does not deserve the name of a researcher. due to the fact that the war line was not by nationality, but by humanity.
Israel's renowned Holocaust historian Yehuda Bauer enthusiastically accepts Engelking's “determinations” by commenting: “We suspected that it was, but she proved it.” The same proves his integrity as a historian due to the fact that the evidence provided by B. Engelking is presented in an absolutely unscientific way from the point of view of historical research. According to Heller's article, Bauer simultaneously eats simplifications disqualifying him as a historian of himself. He claims that Engelking's investigation is besides applicable from the point of view, that half of the six million Jews murdered in the Holocaust were Polish citizens, but not even a word about the Holocaust being done by Germany or even Nazis.
Barbara Engelking claims – but does not prove in any way – that 160 to 250 1000 Jews managed to escape before the Holocaust, but only 10 to 20 percent of them survived. The remainder were to die at the hands of Polish peasants or as a consequence of their reports to the occupying authorities. She does not say a word about the sources of that cognition and how she did these calculations.
Barbara Engelking besides does not compose about very many cases of Jews who have revealed to Germany all the families and places where they were helped., and the fact that only in occupied Poland the granting of aid to Jews was threatened by the death penalty, he only mentions it with a half-dozen. From her book, but besides during the discussion in Yad Vashem, the news is that in the work of the extermination of Jews supposedly Polish peasants acted almost hand in hand with the German occupier.
I wonder if Barbara Engelking even reached the Archives of the Institute of National Memory to learn about many testimonies of Polish-Jewish business period stored there. evidence of heroism of Poles saving Jews. But besides evidence of post-war persecution of people providing aid to Jews during the war, by safety officials, frequently derived from the criminal margin and participating in the process of looting. due to the fact that Jews were most frequently rescued by people who identified themselves with a Christian attitude, and frequently nationalists who, after the war, continued to pay the highest price for specified an attitude. Those were the ones who did not boast to the communists that they helped Jews during the war.
As quoted at the outset, Jews were only fleeing the Nazis – in Aron Heller's article written not to know why out of capital letters – and Poles killed those fleeing. So, then, do Poles brutally and cruelly interfere in innocent Jewish-German playing tag? The scale of the distortion of the essence of the phenomenon in the commentary quoted at the outset does not require comment. It requires a strong protest.
It is worth commenting on another component of the article in The Times of Israel. The article was illustrated by a photograph from the collections of the Yad Vashem Institute, depicting a group of German gendarmes photographed before the post in Otfinów. The photograph was signed in the paper as depicting “Polish gendarms” while the German uniforms and German inscription clearly appear above the entrance of “Gend. Stützpunkt Otfinów” (Gendarmerie Stützpunkt – a point of support of the gendarmerie, or fortified post). As a live one, there is not a single Polish gendarme in this photograph (because there was no 1 during the occupation) and no Pole at all.
This scale of historical manipulation suggests that it is Barbara Engelking, alternatively of taking the problem of researching and explaining hard and dramatic events from our history, under the cloak of historical investigation she conducts a policy of defamation of Poland and Poles. It is consistent with this attitude in the German thesis on “Polish camps”. Hand in hand with Hitler's graves. But does all of this gotta and should be a investigation facility operating for public Polish money? I am not referring to the Polish government's "irritation" but to the verification, which investigation is financed from the Polish state budget? And are these truly reliable “scientific research”?
(MIC)
]]>http://pressmania.pl/barbara-engelking-o-holocauscie-anti-Polish-thesis/]]>
Polish anti-Semitism is heard all over the world. Jerzy Ślaski, who is already dead in his book “Soldiers of the Curses”, describes this situation:
When, in 1984, in Australia, Melbourne, I spoke to a very rich and very distinguished old lady, a judaic female from Białystok, who complained about Polish anti-Semitism, I besides charged the National Army with this charge, and tried to argue with her, she pinned me with this argument:
— If you don't believe me, I can take you to my brother, who lives here too. The Aquifers tried to kill him and they shot him so hard, he's inactive disabled! The war is over!
— And what was the brother doing then?
— He was an officer. A Polish officer! Deputy Chief of safety in Białystok!
Was I to explain to her that if a man of this level were not of judaic descent but of Spanish or Australian descent, he would besides be shot at? The fact that the percent of Jews among those officers of the UB, who were hit by underground spheres, is much higher than the percent of people of this origin in the full Polish population of that time, is due solely to the fact that they so numerously occupied the various structures of the UB, any of them completely subjugating. And the higher they were, the more they were there. This is besides worth reminding.
Indeed. specified “Polish anti-Semitism”, as described above, was rather common immediately after the war. However, we should remember the Israeli writer Sewer Plocker (21.12.2006):
Jews active in authoritative Communist panic cameras (in the russian Union and abroad) and who sometimes led them, did not, of course, as Jews, but alternatively as Stalinists, communists and "Soviet people". That is why it is easy to ignore their origins and to “play stupid ”; what should we do with them? But let's not forget them. My own view is different. I find it unacceptable that a individual will be considered a associate of the judaic nation erstwhile he does wonderful things, but is not considered part of our people erstwhile he does amazingly wicked things.
Even if we deny it, we cannot escape the Jewishness of “our executioners” who served Red panic with loyalty and dedication [from the moment] of its establishment. Eventually, others will always remind us of their origin.
(original text: ]]>https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0.73440,L-3342999,00.html]]>)
Meanwhile, in the planet the pursuit of planet War II is becoming clearer only through the prism of the Holocaust. All Europe, “infected with the virus of Christianity”, was anti-Semitic, resulting in German death camps.
“Facts” are selected in a completely biased way, accompanied by an unparalleled attack on reasoning people. 1 should callback the not so old case of Magda Cucumber, which reminded the leftist politician Borowski the father's name. According to a fan of political fiction from Czerska and established by the esbek TVN seizures, this was to be an example of Polish anti-Semitism. Meanwhile, it was truly about identifying a household connection with the most disgusting executioner of the Polish Nation after planet War II! But the Jews in UB must be kept silent. likewise as about Jews in the NKVD or in... SS (Reinhard Heydrich).
It's quiet for a moment, but it's being recovered again due to Oilman and Boni. Further statements to force the conviction of the “scientific” wife of the esbek confident, Barbara Engelking and the remainder of the judaic community require repetition of long-written texts.
Well, evidently it's the right thing to do...
21.04 2023
![[Podsumowanie na żywo. Czwartek 18:00] 27 rocznica zabójstwa gen. Marka Papały. Policja się poddała. KONFRONTACJA LIVE](http://latkowski.com/upload/files/984/800x600/Papala-latkowski.jpg)
