To the rose of life. In consequence to 'Dear Leo and all Leo-like' / leo

Dear Rose.
To begin with, I would like to thank you for your concern about the state of my perception of reality, a worthy intellectual patient who would like to open a clinic in the closed ward to diagnose and heal medical and method personnel, and in a distant way besides people behind the window and on TV.
I besides thank you for inviting me to the salons, and I admit, I do not share your concern that I will bring you mud, since you are stuck in Russian lignite dung. It remains to be hoped that fishing shoes will suffice, though they do not scope the ears. Don't worry and don't explain, Shreck besides had a niche in the swamp and (until then) he was fine with it. By the way, I urge you to complete the evidence due to the fact that the 1 with the powerful influence of propaganda on my and the “Leo-like” views has clearly broken down. Hurry up and don't miss the large sale at "Wildberries" before the Ukrainians burn down the last magazines, they won't go after "Ozone" and the remainder in retaliation for attacking their own "New Post". The saying, “If you live in a glass house, do not throw (in the enemy) stones” one more time works and even literally.
In my case, you hit me very unfortunately. I am an exceptionally resistant case to the distortion and coloring of past and reality, even to advertising in the media and a possible interest limited to information content.
Repertoire of your means of influence is highly poor. You benefit from the fact that the public discussion is not utilized to convince the interviewer, the misconversion of the facts repeated repeatedly perpetuates in the consciousness of the recipient, the transmission is akin through the scope of affirmative reception. Smaller, equally important: the inducing of the mechanics of denial, the opinions of mediocrity created by authority and, of course, the authority of the infallible and knowledgeable Leader brought to worship.
Now, get a self-reflection and consider a question disproved of knowing that possibly your views are the product of indoctrination?
I'll go back to tech. The usage of means of influence on the interviewer succeeds erstwhile he is drawn into the discussion, raises doubts and the most important, due to the fact that that is the point, they will lead to the alleged "factuals" - a term, though negative logic, but dressed in 'compromise' of unilateral concessions and the cessation of defence in order to make slots available for bullshit. In fact, the facts cannot be agreed, they state: 'what, where, when, who or what'. Until the solid foundation of the pyramid, consisting of witnesses, documents, material testimonies, and all the evidence gathered, is demolished straight and by the denial of which the top is simply a fact, it is inviolable.
The fact of the forest fire, which the full surrounding fire department has engaged in, is incapable to deny the stubbornness of the local fool who would have cut his hand off that nothing like this happened. Even if the said fool sold the farm and bought opinions of local authorities: parish priest, mayor, entrepreneur, it does not change the fact that the forest burned. In addition, he deserved to be called an archer due to the fact that in the name of defending stupidity he lost money to the smart guys.
– Any GMO, 5G, gender, lethal vaccines, false pandemic, chemotrails, heart muscle tissue in the host, Smolenian bombing?
After this introduction, it is time for me to mention to the content of the call entitled “Dear Leo and all Leo-like” from your collection “On the Way of Life” - the second superb title.
Now that I've explained it to you, due to the fact that you evidently didn't know what the facts were and what might undermine them, I'm going to go to the point.
Facts:
We are not bordering America or Israel and unlike Russia and their existence does not endanger us militarily.
The crimes in Buczy were committed by Russian soldiers, any of the commanders were already tracked down by Ukrainian intelligence and eliminated.
Since the Romanov dynasty wars through the Crimean wars, the Ottoman Empire war, the British Empire war, the German Empire war, the russian Union war, including, for example, the Baltic countries, Georgia, Ukraine, intervention in Afghanistan, the mediate East, Africa, the war with Ukraine since 2014 and many others, all historical and present have imperial backgrounds.
The number of casualties of wars provoked by Russia or during planet War II caused by failed command and failure to account for the lives of soldiers outweighs the losses of all another armies taken together.
In addition, the effects of Russia's interior policy on its own citizens, which can only be compared to the plundering of natural materials, besides the extermination of full nations gives respect for a large number of over 100 million.
National policy continues. Details Concerning Burianation, the south of Russia, an undiagnosed epidemic justifying the impact of hundreds of thousands of livestock from the march without quarantine and treatment attempts you can easy find.
During the French run in 1940, (not in 1939, as you write) moving from May 10 to June 25, the French army suffered about 92 1000 killed and 250,000 wounded.
Russia's aggression to Ukraine has already consumed about 2 million victims, including nearly 1.5 million on the Russian side.
Daily Russia, as a consequence of persistently repeated “meat storms” by the death region under Ukrainian drone control, statistically loses more than 1,000 soldiers. They only burden Russia and Putin's psychopath who rules it.
- I'm sorry. Go, but further than Lwów and see for yourself, only get cucumbers from Poland, due to the fact that in Russia they are 3 times more expensive, as you already mention about the “minor war”.
Russia's economy is close ruin, and the fact that the state despite the (official) budget gap reaching 7 trillion rubles (more than $90 billion) inactive has funds for the military and war, does not change much. Capital escapes in awe, bank withdrawals are lined up, everything that was built outside Moscow and Petersburg is scattered in the eyes and sinks in garbage. A fewer 1000 schools (not only two) have toilets outside, about the condition of hospitals, clinics, kindergartens and nurseries only mention. Even in large cities, the net doesn't work for weeks, you gotta sleep for fuel and fight under gas stations and you deficiency it until harvest.
You mentioned Ukrainian chauvinism. Have you not considered that his origin was the omission of Ukraine in the Versailles Treaty and the next 20 years of the politics of the Second Republic towards the Ukrainians with peculiar merits of the endecia which unleashed the plague of nationalism on both sides? Your idol Braun is nothing more than the heir to a pre-war endece.
Think again for a minute and effort to find the answer to the question: Why was Poland surrounded by enemies on 3 sides in 1939, why was it possible to sign the Ribbentrop – Molotov pact, why did the Soviets enter the Kresy without any resistance, as they were frequently greeted with flowers?
Yeah, you think it's judaic treason.
At the end. I do not know whether to laughter or break hands over the falling from the surroundings of Braun, Korwin or Czarnek with the moronic comparisons of the European Union to Targowice and cuttings. The fact lies where it lies, and it lies in that the Union is simply a voluntary club recognising the list of values that are the achievements of civilization. The speeches of Braun, Bryłka or Zajęczkowska-Hernik are at best perceived as a gibberish from a parallel planet that stopped somewhere in the mediate Ages.
The analogy with Targowice begins to be clear. As in the 18th century, the position of bishops and magnates proclaiming views about the divine order of things threatened the Enlightenment and the Mayov Constitution, so now Braun and the company are threatened by the Union.
For 2 and a half centuries, from the arrogant “Rzeczpospolita from the sea to the sea”, where the Jesuits had not come into the planet 1 technological work and not 1 philosophical treatise over which European minds would lean.

And it was good as it was.