The conversation in "Facts After Facts" began with a case that has been stimulating for weeks in the service and politics: the President's decision to suspend the nomination for 136 young officers. Zbigniew Bogucki, Minister at the Chancellery of the President, argued that this was the consequence of the behaviour of the current heads of peculiar services.
"You don't answer the question at all"
“I invited 4 heads of service to meet with the President, in accordance with peculiar services laws, to study on security, we are geopolitical in difficulty (...). abruptly it turns out that these heads of service, despite the invitation of the president to discuss crucial matters, besides about appointments (...). They have, as I realize it, a ban from the Prime Minister to come – Bogucki reported.
As he added, on behalf of Karol Nawrocki, he invited 4 heads of service to meet with the president to study on the safety of the state. The invitation was besides intended to address the nomination issues which the president yet suspended. According to Bogucki, despite the formal writing addressed to Donald Tusk and Władysław Kosiniak Kamysz, no of the heads of service appeared in the Presidential Palace.
I'm talking about the heads of service. If the officers do not comply with the law, do not want to study to the President, they do not want to come to the President, that is to say, the highest typical of the Polish state, the superior of the armed forces, even though their superior, Donald Tusk, but besides Prime Minister Kosiniak Kamysz, in the field of military services, is informed that the president is to be certain that these people are making the right choices, the right choices regarding the officer's appointment," said Bogucki.
It was on this argument that the minister built the thesis that "the heads of service are breaking the law" and do not comply with laws which grant the president the right to receive safety information. At 1 point Peter Kraśko interrupted this enumeration with words that became the axis of the full clash: "You did not answer the question at all".
The writer recalled that the question afraid the destiny of 136 young people who were waiting for officer promotions. Bogacki immediately returned to the subject of the superiors of the service, but Kraśko objected, stressing that we are talking about people who are not facing any charges, and the consequences of the President's decision fall on them.
Officer nominations like blocking judges' posts
As the conversation intensified, Bogacki's argument began to turn towards another organization disputes. The minister, defending the president's decision, compared the suspension of officer appointments to blocking judges' posts. He argued that the courts had not held positions for a long time, and that the work for this was on the current government and named politicians.
Why hasn't a 1000 judges been cast for 2 years? Young people are waiting for jobs. First Adam Bodnar and then Waldemar Żurek, commissioned by Prime Minister Tusk, block – says Bogucki.
Piotr Kraśko immediately reacted, reminding that the crisis around the Constitutional Court and the courts had a history, and the question in the programme inactive afraid something else – why Poland did not have 136 fresh officers at its disposal during the tense safety situation. At 1 point, the guide cut down this symbolic figure "a moment, who attacked the Constitutional Court?"
Bogacki repeated that the president "was not offended by anyone", and his decision was an expression of opposition to the non-execution of the law by the heads of service and government. Kraśko stressed, however, that viewers – like him – inactive did not receive answers to the basic question: why the consequences of this war at the top of the state fall on people who were expected to simply receive nominations and uniform stars on the day of the promotion.
