The second year of the deepest overestimation has begun not only in our region of the world. According to the projections (also described in this cycle), 2025 was not only the “end of the beginning” of the fresh era, but besides the beginning (definitive?) of the end of the era which began in the early 1970s.
The immediate future is not so hard to predict: the leaders of change are and will be the United States, notabenes informing many times about their intentions, which they did not want to perceive to. It was worth it.
New Pax Americana
There are published reliable authoritative documents: you can read. The future of Polish-Russian relations can be predicted on the basis of these. The most crucial thing is that the political objectives of our "strategic ally" (?) are in fundamental contradiction with the stated intentions, both European, or EU "leadership", but besides our country's political leadership. The contradiction is in relation to Russia: Washington is not anti-Russian, it does not see an enemy in Russia, and we like “European leadership” – on the contrary. If the U.S. pacification and partition plan to end the Russian-Ukrainian war is successful in 2026, then we will gotta choose whether we want to be on the side of the winners or losers. Then we will gotta choose: the US wants to prevent the European-Russian war, which means that we gotta tell whether we want a war with Russia (today we want) or a peace, and the fresh Pax Americana may disagree (and very much so) from our ideas.
Survivor of “anti-communism”
In the consciousness of most of the U.S. political class is, was and will be anti-Russian, or "anti-communist". I think it's a completely incorrect diagnosis in part one: Donald Trump is anti-communist, but this "communism" sees simultaneously in the Democratic Party, the European Union and, of course, in the People's Republic of China, which the Communist organization of China rules and will rule. Our aberration is to identify this hated communism with Russia. At least 3 hypotheses can be adopted by the next year:
- The U.S. will lead to the division of Ukraine into 2 spheres of influence: American and Russian, while the possessors will defend their acquisitions (as sometimes happens between the possessors),
- EU politicians who are inactive promoters of the war with Russia will endure a terrible political defeat, which will weaken their integration aspirations and have given up time or even eliminated the emergence of the European Union as the sixth planet power,
- A fresh group of large powers, i.e. the US, China, Russia, India and Japan (C-5), will guarantee that no 1 pushes or invites into this group.
The final triumph of the superpower
If Pax Americana's fresh leader survives next year (he was already wanted to kill him once) and does not destruct his career as a scandalist Epstein (or perhaps), the European Union will regulation by the same politicians as today, and in Russia will stay Vladimir PutinThese hypotheses can work. This will be the last triumph of a superpower that already wants to get off the phase in the most beneficial way to itself. By giving China Africa and Russia a triumph in the war against Ukraine, it wants in return full freedom in the Western Hemisphere. As far as Europe is afraid in the "EU edition", it is weakening, and preferably decomposition is simply a price to be paid to Russia, which will besides be in the interests of the another members of C-5. The full post-colonial planet hates erstwhile oppressors, is left-wing and at the same time anti-American. All paradoxes? Only seemingly: settlements with the past (the good 1 and the bad one) take place today: after all, hundreds of millions of young Africans and Asians do not remember the times erstwhile the russian Union existed, which has been gone for 35 years now, as there is no socialist economy at the time, and the world's mill is completely communist China. This time for pro-American sovetologists is most likely besides complicated.
Prof. Witold Modzelewski
