478. The drugs Lindsay Clancy received are predictively causing psychosis, suicide and murder. due to the fact that her doctors knew that, they were liable for the deaths.
13 drugs in 4 months and 5 doctors who never talked to each other. Evidence confirms she was innocent, and the execution of her children was caused by doctors.
Robert Yoho, MD
Summary
● On 24 January 2023, Lindsay Clancy, a midwife caregiver from Duxbury, Massachusetts, strangled her 3 children: Cora (5 years old), Dawson (3), and Callan (8 months old), and then attempted suicide by jumping from a second-floor window.
● Within 4 months before the murders, 5 different doctors prescribed her more than 30 prescriptions for 13 different psychiatric medications, adjusting doses and adding fresh medications all fewer days.
● 6 of these 13 drugs, Zoloft, Prozac, Desyrel, Remeron, Elavil, and Seroquel, have a black FDA box on suicidal thoughts and behaviour. The seventh, Lamictal, carries a related FDA warning, added in 2008. This is not a fresh or contested finding. It reaches the first drug studies in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
● Her trial ended with a mistrial on September 4, 2026. The jury was unanimous in ratio 11 to 1, and 11 jurors advocated an acquittal due to insanity.
● Plymouth region prosecutors have not yet decided whether to resume her trial. The position proceeding was scheduled for 29 September 2026.
● Clancy is in Tewksbury State Hospital, paralyzed after a suicide attempt, over 3 years after the murders.
● The work for the murders rests solely on doctors who prescribed psychiatric drugs known for force and suicide.
What happened in Duxbury
Lindsay Clancy spent the morning of January 24, 2023, as did most of the mornings of this winter. She took the children to visit her pediatrician and then built a snowman with them in the backyard of her home in Duxbury. Around 4:00 p.m., she sent her husband, Patrick, to the case. During his absence, she strangled Cora, Dawson, and Callan with opposition gums in the basement. Then she cut her wrists and throat and then jumped out of a second level window. Patrick returned home around 6:09 p.m., found the scene and called 911 2 minutes later. Cora and Dawson were pronounced dead at the infirmary that night. Callan died 3 days later due to complications associated with strangulation. Lindsay Clancy survived, permanently paralyzed after the fall.
The prosecutors charged her with 3 first-degree homicides.
13 drugs in 4 months
The most crucial evidence in this case never came from the crime scene. She came from pharmacies and medical records.
Between September 2022 and January 2023 Clancy received psychiatric care to treat postpartum depression and anxiety from a rotating squad of doctors, no of whom seem to cooperate with each other. The court testimony, including Rebecca Jollotta's psychiatric nurse's evidence from the South Shore wellness Behavioral Care Program and Boston Globe's agenda of medicine treatment based on evidence from the trial, documented the following past of drug prescribing:
● Zoloft (sertralina), started in September 2022, stopped for insomnia. informing about the FDA black box: suicidal thoughts and behaviour.
● Ativan (lorazepam), prescribed October 21, dose reduced November 2. Benzodiazepine, class of medicines associated in published case literature with deinhibition and aggressive dyscontrol in a subset of patients.
● Benadryl (diphenhydramine), added as a sedative.
● Buspar (buspiron), prescribed twice in 2 weeks by the same doctor, mostly not taken.
● Desyrel (trazodone), prescribed November 15. informing about the FDA black box: suicidal thoughts and behaviour.
● Prozac (fluoxetine), prescribed November 21. FDA black box warning: suicidal thoughts and behavior, the same signal first documented in fluoxetine clinical literature in 1990.
● Ambien (zolpidem), added November 25.
● Remeron (mirtazapine), added November 25. informing about the FDA black box: suicidal thoughts and behaviour. Clancy later described this drug as triggering "very intrusive thoughts that I had never had before" and asked to halt it.
● Clonopin (clonazepam), added November 25. Benzodiazepine, in the same literature on disinhibition and aggression as Ativan and Valium.
● Valium (diazepam), prescribed repeatedly, in days apart, by various doctors. Benzodiazepine was most straight associated with published reports of drug-induced rage and dyscontrol.
● Seroquel (quetiapine), antipsychotic, prescribed on 29 November. Bears 2 – FDA box: suicidal thoughts and behaviour and increased mortality in aged patients with dementia-related psychosis. The infirmary staff recommended that she halt on December 20, despite the nurse's opposition that the withdrawal threatens to "degrade the mood, worsen the sleep".
● Lamictal (lamotrigine), temper stabilizer, prescribed December 16. He received a FDA informing on suicidal thoughts and behaviours, added in 2008 after a pooled analysis of 199 trials of 11 anticonvulsants that showed that the hazard is increased in all classes of drugs.
● Elavil (amitriptyline), prescribed January 16, 8 days before the murders. FDA warning: suicidal thoughts and behavior, the same informing that all antidepressant on this list carries.
13 drugs. 5 classes: SSRI, antipsychotic, 3 benzodiazepines, temper stabilizer and many sedatives and hypnotics, applied on each another and replaced within a fewer days by clinicians who did not communicate. It's not a treatment. It's an uncontrollable experimentation involving the brain chemistry of a postpartum woman, led by a shredded wellness care strategy that settles all visit and goes on.
The prosecutors argued during the trial that Clancy took only a fraction of the prescribed dose, and the tox screen results were incompatible with the communicative of the "transmit" defense. This dispute has never been resolved. The jury didn't decide who was right.
Jury divided
Clancy's trial began in late July 2026 at the Plymouth region ultimate Court before justice William Sullivan. The defence argued that she was not liable for criminal liability under Massachusetts law due to the fact that she suffered postpartum psychosis, a hidden bipolar disorder, or both during the killings.
Yoho comment: Postpartum depression or even psychosis frequently respond to progesterone injection, although any patient in a psychotic crisis needs immediate control, regardless of cause. Hormonal therapy is neither fashionable nor considered reasonable by conventional medicine, so it is not widely known information. The same barriers apply to prescribing testosterone and another hormones, as described in Hormone Secrets.
Forensic psychiatrist Dr. Phillip Resnick testified that that day she was "clearly psychotic" and described her behaviour as "almost like a puppet," as if "someone else was pulling strings." scientist Paul Zeizel testified that "she did not appreciate the mistake of her act." household members, including nanny and mother, sister, and mother-in-law, described a rapid, visible deterioration in her intellectual state in the weeks prior to the murder, as well as repeated unsuccessful attempts to get her help.
The prosecutors responded that Clancy acted with planning and rational thinking. She measured her husband's absence, chose a basement, killed a kid who was most likely resisting, and during telemedicine the day before denied any thought of harming children. Their own psychiatric experts, Dr. Gregory Saathoff and Dr. Kirk Heilbrun, testified that the item in her account, namely that she heard the commanding voice only once, was different for actual psychosis. A 3rd prosecution expert, Dr. Alia Goodheart of McLean Hospital, testified that Clancy was showing depression and problem sleeping, but showed no psychosis.
The jury sat for six days, about 36 hours, starting on August 27. On September 4, 2026, justice Sullivan was informed that they were in stalemate and would not issue a unanimous verdict. He announced a mistrial. The jury, consisting of 9 women and 3 men, divided between 11 and 1, with 11 people in favour of an acquitted verdict due to insanity.
Eleven out of 12 jurors, after six weeks of evidence from psychiatrists, household members, and doctors on both sides, came to the conclusion that Lindsay Clancy should not go to jail. This fact itself deserves more weight than it received in relation to the matter.
Which is not confirmed.
One of the jurors, Paula Devlin, gave a tv interview after a mistrial, describing the only non-conservative as a black man otherwise a white jury and saying she refuses to explain her reasoning in the light of evidence. Defender Kevin Reddington responded honestly, saying he hopes the juror "will be able to sleep peacefully at night." The defence separately argued in court papers that the stance of the resisting individual reflects prejudice towards people with serious intellectual illness.
Devlin's relation is the only origin for the racial composition of this deadlock. No judicial act confirms this independently. After her hearing, individual identified a circumstantial individual online as a juror who disagreed, and the Massachusetts ultimate Court files were then sealed to defend the privacy and safety of jurors. This paper will not repeat this recognition or unverified allegations related to it. An unsolved jury doesn't deserve a doxxing campaign, no substance what score anyone wants.
However, 1 thing can be said: the jury, who heard the full medical documentation, powerfully advocated the designation of Lindsay Clancy for irresponsible criminality, and 1 of the jurors, for reasons that stay his own, prevented the authoritative release of this verdict.
The informing was already present in the first studies
This is not a communicative about 2 unlucky families whose tragedies coincided with a bottle of prescription. It's a communicative of a documented, published and repeated safety signal that the psychiatrist's profession has been downplaying for 35 years, while the manufacture selling these drugs has been trying to maintain.
Fluoxetine, sold as Prozac, barely appeared on the marketplace before reports of cases began to appear. In 1990, Harvard psychiatrists Martin Teicher, Carol Glod and Jonathan Cole published an article in the American diary of Psychiatry "The emergence of intense suicidal obsession during fluoxetine treatment", describing patients with no past of suicidal thoughts who developed violent, obsessive suicidal thoughts within weeks of starting treatment. 2 years later, William Wirshing and co-workers, writing in Archives of General Psychiatry, proposed a mechanism: fluoxetine-induced akathisia, a state of intolerable interior anxiety strong adequate to prompt a man to force against himself or, in any documented cases, against others. Eli Lilly, the drug manufacturer, felt this anxiety so powerfully that he published his own meta-analysis of counter-arguments in BMJ the same year, an article funded by manufacture that only exists due to the fact that the company had to answer questions that investigation data had never meant to make them disappear.
Benzodiazepines in Clancy's government have a parallel, separately documented history. Published series of cases, including Gardner and Cowdry's 1985 study in the American diary of Psychiatry and the 1988 Dietch and Jennings study in the 1988 diary of Clinical Psychiatry, describe patients taking medicines from the same group as Ativan, Klonopin and Valium, who developed sudden, different anger and aggressive discontrol. A 2002 review published in Psychiatric Bulletin confirmed that the pattern is real, while noting that it focuses on identifiable hazard groups. A specialist who prescribed Lindsay Clancy 3 benzodiazepines, in addition to 2 antidepressants, in addition to antipsychotic and temper stabilising, is liable for thousands of incidents like this. No 1 utilized the word akathisia during Clancy's trial. This is not due to the fact that this mechanics does not apply to a case based on rapid, advanced doses and multi-drug psychiatric prescription. This is due to the fact that the prosecution had no reason to decision this up, and the defence chose a simpler, conventional version to tell the jury in six weeks: postpartum psychosis.
The industry's own past undermines the investigation she utilized to build her argument. In 2008, Erick Turner and co-workers published an article in the fresh England diary of medicine "Selective publication of antidepressant investigation and its impact on apparent efficacy", comparing what pharmaceutical companies reported to the FDA, with what went to medical journals read by doctors. Studies with affirmative results were published almost without exception. Studies with negative or non-impressive results mostly disappeared or reappeared disguised as something more beneficial than the data confirmed. Additionally, these studies usually lasted between 6 and 8 weeks, and the side effects of the medicine – dry mouth, sedation, anxiety – frequently tell the patient and the assessor they received, undermining the blind, upon whom the full safety comparison depends.
Give these trials the purest explanation possible. It doesn't matter. No patient takes psychiatric medicine for six to 8 weeks and then stops. Zoloft, Ativan, Prozac, Klonopin, Seroquel and the remainder of Clancy's list are prescribed for years, frequently for life, and studies that claim to justify the patient's long-term leave on their usage represent a different, much weaker collection of evidence than preliminary studies approved. Robert Whitaker in Anatomy of an Epidemic says, that these long-term studies are deliberately comparing the patient on drugs with the individual who abruptly stopped the same medicine alternatively than the naive patient, so what in the placebo group is assessed as "relapse" is withdrawal.
A medicine that cannot be stopped without causing symptoms to be treated is not a treatment that the patient decides to continue. It's an addiction he can't abandon. Ativan, Klonopin and Valium are national controlled substances from list IV precisely due to the fact that benzodiazepine dependence is real, legally recognised and has been since the 1970s. SSRIs were sold as free from this problem. A systematic 2019 review published in Addictive Behaviors showed that 56 percent of patients who effort to halt antidepressants experience withdrawal symptoms and 46 percent of them study withdrawal as severe. another researchers later questioned this uncovering for methodological reasons, although not due to the underlying clinical phenomenon.
The class of medicines so hard to stop, prescribed for specified common diseases, is not a case of chemistry. A 2002 BMJ article by Ray Moynihan, Iona Heath and David Henry and a more direct 2018 Goldman Sachs investigation note, which openly asks whether patients' treatment is simply a balanced business model, both depict the same point from the other sides of the industry: a drug that the patient will take erstwhile is worth far little to the maker than a medicine that the patient cannot halt taking. Nothing in 4 months Lindsay Clancy on 13 drugs looks like a strategy optimized for her recovery. It looks like a strategy designed to accomplish this, no substance what anyone intended.
What "standard care" hides
None of the materials in this section are classified. Profession has published, duplicated and debated this for over 30 years in his own magazines. A doctor who joins 3 benzodiazepines, 5 antidepressants and temper stabilizer within 4 months makes a mistake in art and is liable for possible violence.
I call it an incidental called "clean killing by female doctors." Although this sounds absurd, the standard of care will most likely defend any doctor mentioned in this file from the licensing committee, the medical mistake jury and the headlines. The standard of care measures what a careful colleague would usually do under the same circumstances. It does not say anything about whether the full specialisation, trained on falsified evidence by corrupt pharmaceutical companies and protected from consequences by its own guidelines, has made catastrophic mistakes for 4 decades.
Precedent: David Carmichael and Paxil
This isn't a fresh pattern. In July 2004, David Carmichael, a Toronto father, with no past of force or intellectual illness, received SSRI Paxil (paroxetine) for work-related stress. Within 3 weeks of resuming and expanding the dose, permanent delusions developed and broke with reality, and then strangled Ian's 11-year-old boy in a hotel room, believing that in a psychotic state he was saving the boy suffering. A court in London, Ontario, found him unpunished due to a intellectual disorder. 2 independent forensic psychiatrists, 1 employed by the defense, the another by the crown, agreed he was psychotic erstwhile he killed his son.
Carmichael spent the last 2 decades building public evidence that Paxil had triggered his psychosis, citing a product monograph of a drug that had already in 1996 listed delusions and psychosis as uncommon side effects. He presently runs the Know Your Drugs organization, which insists on mandatory tox screens of mass shooters, including psychiatric medications. Tennessee adopted this policy in 2026.
Massachusetts is not Ontario, and its standard of insanity is not identical to the Canadian defence against criminal irresponsibility. However, the basic medical mechanics is the same that led to 11 jurors being willing to acquit Lindsay Clancy: prescribing psychiatric drugs can origin psychosis in people without prior past of its occurrence.
Paper way Paxil: Healy, Valley and papers the manufacture did not want to find
Psychiatry for decades explained the deaths and force associated with these medicines as a product of the underlying illness alternatively than the medicine itself. Psychiatrist David Healy, who analyzed Eli Lilly's interior papers from the Prozac trial, stated that the company's management privately estimated the hazard of drug suicide at 5.6 times higher than the older antidepressant, imipramine, while informing the public and regulators of something else. Peter Gøtzsche later re-examined the 2006 FDA meta-analysis involving 100,000 patients and stated that the actual hazard of suicide was understated 5 times. GlaxoSmithKline itself presents a akin story: in 2012, the company confessed to national charges and paid $3 billion, which was the largest compensation for medical fraud in U.S. past at the time, after prosecutors discovered that the company was promoting Paxil to treat depression in patients under the age of 18, utilizing an article written by a ghost that misreported a failed paediatric study, while 2 another paediatric studies showing no effect Paxil was never revealed.
Stewart Dolin, an lawyer from Chicago without a past of depression, took a generic paroxetine for 8 days to treat work-related anxiety before passing under the train. His widow, Wendy Dolin, won the verdict of the jury against drug producers in 2017 after disclosure that the company had known for years about the drug's association with akathisia, an intense drug-induced agitation that Healy and psychiatrist Peter Breggin indicate as a mechanics most associated with SSRI force and suicides. The appeal court later overturned this judgement on the basis of a legal doctrine unrelated to basic medical evidence, but the trial file and the company's interior papers he discovered stay public.
The case file on Clancy without issue from either side confirms that 5 doctors prescribed 13 different psychiatric medications within 4 months, repeatedly changing treatment, sometimes prescribing the same medicine twice in 2 weeks, up to 8 days before children died.
Innocent due to insanity
Massachusetts law asks whether, at the time of the act, the suspect had no crucial ability to appreciate the illegality of his actions or to bring him into law due to intellectual illness or defect. 2 forensic experts testified that Clancy fulfilled this standard. household members who observed the worsening intellectual state live and tried to supply her with more aid repeatedly confirmed this statement.
The strongest argument of the prosecution was that she had planned the time and place of the murders. Planning and psychosis are not mutually exclusive. David Carmichael planned the circumstances of his son's death with the same calm, organized goal that prosecutors describe in Clancy's case, acting simultaneously according to delusions that the court later found irresponsible for criminal offences. Judicial psychology recognizes this pattern frequently adequate to name it: organized, deliberate behaviour driven by psychotic content. The individual implements the plan with complete determination, even erstwhile its justification is cut off from reality.
11 jurors came to the same conclusion after weeks of evidence which this entry simply summed up. The accusation based on tox screens and 1 different item in Clancy's account of proceeding the voice did not convince them. That shouldn't settle things for the remainder of us.
Lindsay Clancy had spent over 3 years in the hospital, paralyzed and separated from what was left of her family. Prison doesn't add anything to that. conviction acquitted of insanity, while inactive in a psychiatric facility, is consistent with both the medical evidence and the moral reality of what 5 careless doctors did to the fresh mother's brain for 4 months.
Synthesis: The fact has been covered up.
My next entry is entitled "SSRI 'Antidepressants' psychiatric drugs origin suicide and killings: a full story." He'll tell you about the details I wasn't expected to put in here.
Selected Sources
NPR, " Lindsay Clancy process ends with mistrial," September 4, 2026.
CBS News Boston, "The Lindsay Clancy execution trial: Unsolved jury, nullity of trial," live updates.
The Boston Globe, "Lindsay Clancy Timeline: 13 Drugs", July 27, 2026.
NBC Boston, " Lindsay Clancy's trial: Psychiatry evidence on Drugs."
NewsNation: "Lindsay Clancy took only a fraction of the prescribed drugs, claims prosecutors."
Wikipedia, "Killing Clancy's children."
Go to 10, "Judge summarizes the identity of Lindsay Clancy jurors after they were revealed online," September 14, 2026.
Teicher MH, Glod C, Cole JO, "The appearance of intense suicidal obsession during treatment with fluoxetine," American diary of Psychiatry, 1990.
Wirshing WC, Van Putten T, Rosenberg J and others, "Fluoxetine, akathisia and suicidal thoughts: Is there a causal relationship?". General psychiatry archive, 1992.
Beasley CM Jr. and Others, "Fluoxetine and Suicide: Meta-analysis of Controlled Depression Treatment Studies", BMJ, 1991.
Gardner DL, Cowdry RW, "A control caused by alprazolam in borderline personality disorder", American diary of Psychiatry, 1985.
Dietch JT, Jennings RK, "Agressive Discontrol in Patients Treated with benzodiazepines," diary of Clinical Psychiatry, 1988.
Paton C, "Benzodiazepines and inhibition: review", Psychiatric Bulletin, 2002.
Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Rosenthal RS, Rosenthal R, "Selective publication of antidepressant studies and their impact on apparent efficacy", fresh England diary of Medicine, 2008.
Robert Whitaker, Epilepsy Anatomy: Magic Balls, Psychiatric Drugs, and the Astounding emergence of intellectual Diseases in America. Crown, 2010.
Judge Davies, Read J, "A systematic review of the occurrence, severity and duration of antidepressant withdrawal actions: are guidelines based on evidence?". Addictional Behavior, 2019.
Moynihan R, Heath I, Henry D, "Disease sales: pharmaceutical manufacture and illness distribution", BMJ, 2002.
Goldman Sachs (Salveen Richter analyst), "Genome Revolution," she said as "Goldman asks: Is patient treatment a sustainable business model?" CNBC, April 11, 2018.
U.S. Department of Justice, "GlaxoSmithKline pleads guilty and pays $3 billion to resolve fraud charges and not study safety data," 2 July 2012
David Carmichael, "Three weeks to prescripticide." RxISK.
David Carmichael, "Relax, organized, murderous behavior: My connections to school shooters." Mad in America, March 27, 2018.
Wisner Baum, "Dolin v GlaxoSmithKline: Paxil suicide trial."
Mad in America, "Paxil suicide adjourned in appeal," 2018.
Robert Yoho, MD, "David Carmichael's tragedy was the worst I've always heard." Surviving Healthcare, September 24, 2025.
Do I have the right to be outraged? I hope you see it now. Psychiatry is the 3rd most corrupt and harmful specialty – after pediatrics, where doctors gain hundreds of thousands of dollars a year for injecting poisonous vaccines to our children, and dentistry, where mercury, canal treatment and fluorine are their weapons against our health. I'm amazed so fewer people woke up with all this. The best summary of everything discussed here, but dentistry, is my book "Butchered by Healthcare"
https://substack.com/home/post/p-216381364
