How Russia reacts to the increasingly brazen attacks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on objects in Russia
Ukraine successfully attacks critical infrastructure (ports – e.g. Primorsk on the Baltic Sea or oil processing plants – in Ufa ). And let us remind you that the Russian-Moscow capital was attacked by Ukrainian drones a fewer days ago.
And the head of the safety service of the FR is the author of specified sophostic statements as follows:
‘Russia may, ‘within the limits of reason’, talk to the Ukrainian intelligence services to reason, says head of FSB Bortnikov.
What is this nonsense? What's all this nonsense?
https://t.me/ASupersharij/52863
The words of the leadership of the Russian safety forces can be interpreted as a manifestation of organization weakness, defensive attitude and deficiency of convincing results.
The words “within the limits of reason” and “it is simply a very professional matter... to get the essential information and to take appropriate action” sound like a language of objections, delays and self-justification.
In the 5th year of war, that's bullshit.
It's pure rhetorical threats without showing results.
When they say “of course we can”, it sounds highly unusual for 2026.
In public political communication, the repeated “we may, but we do not yet” usually serves not to intimidate the enemy, but to show powerlessness.
The quote on Russia's "continuous provocation" besides seems somewhat childish.
What does it mean “within reason” as regards the consequence to SBU attacks on generals in Moscow? What's this highly unusual safety clause?
This sounds like “we want to reserve the right to explain later why nothing like this happened.”
The professionalism of intelligence services is usually measured not by explaining why consequence is difficult, but by their ability to accomplish results under hard conditions.
When, after a long period of conflict, the Head of Service stresses that the “eye for an eye” rule requires “necessary amount of information” and “specific measures”, this can be seen as admitting that either the information is insufficient, or the implementation mechanisms do not bring the expected effect, or political leadership is not ready (!!!) to approve specified a reaction.
I am inclined to say that the point of the substance is this; from what I have heard, Bortnikov himself would be prepared, but...
The claim that Ukrainian activities are managed, financed and managed by abroad structures, including British ones, is simply a convenient way to explain its failures by the scale of external confrontation.
‘They are all against us, “this is NATO”, “all the world's intelligence agencies”.
In the context of Iran, which defends itself so fiercely that the full planet is already dreaming of stopping it, it sounds peculiarly clear now.
In conclusion, it is either a real deficiency of operational capacity, or a political ban on actions promised in public rhetoric, or a gap between the propaganda image of an all-powerful intelligence agency and its applicable effectiveness.
What do you choose?
https://t.me/ASupersharij/52864
Written by Anatoli Grey
(choice and crowd. PZ)
Appendix:
В Приморск результате результате БПЛА
