Migration policy Denmark, the strongest in the European Union

The Danish government, although made up of social democrats, operates the most restrictive policy towards non-European refugees, from whom it requires close assimilation. Danish culture and Christian values are mandatoryly taught in this Scandinavian country, and in 2021 the long-term plan “zero refugees” was set as the goal.

Denmark is the most internationalised country

Denmark, alongside another Nordic countries, has until late been 1 of the most common directions of migration. The open borders policy has led to the flooding of the local marketplace with inexpensive labour and cultural destruction. Among the Danes, of whom there are only 5.6 million, 1 individual in 10 was born abroad. Between 2010 and 2015, the number of asylum applications increased fourfold to over 21 000.

In response, the government introduced temporary border control (the suspension of the Schengen Agreement) and tightened the criteria for obtaining residence permits. As a result, the lowest number of asylum applications has been recorded throughout 2020 since 1998 (1515 people). The percent of designation in 2020 was 43%, meaning 432 refugees settled in Denmark in 2020.

Anti-immigrant Policy

Anti-immigration sentiments are strong adequate that even the centre-left Sociallemocracy during the run promised to keep the current immigration policy, which during the erstwhile word resulted in the adoption of more than 100 laws limiting immigration.

One example is the introduction of compulsory activities for immigrant children to learn Danish culture and Christian values. Failure to send a kid to specified classes results in receiving benefits.

The prevention of the ghettoisation of immigrants was besides announced. Mjølnerparken settlement in Copenhagen, which is inhabited in 82.6 percent by foreigners, is expected to be displaced from all non-Dunians by 2030.

The government of Prime Minister M. Frederiksen adopted in early June 2021 a bill allowing the beginning of reception centres outside Europe in which asylum seekers will reside while examining their case. Under the fresh rules, asylum seekers must apply personally at the Danish border and then be transported to an asylum centre outside Europe. If the application is accepted and the individual is granted exile status, he or she will be entitled to reside in the country in which she sought a decision but not in Denmark.

In the same year, the nonsubjective of a "zero number of refugees", the withdrawal of residence permits for Syrians (after improving the interior situation in Syria and recognising part of the country as safe) and the plan to set up a fresh facility – a deportation centre on Langeland Island.

Comment

The policy of the Social Democratic organization of Denmark shows that anti-immigration policy has ceased to be the domain of the right-wing parties, and the conventional border between the right and left has long since faded and is not presently focused on conflicting economical ideas, but on culture versus globalism.

It is crucial to consider why the Union is silent about specified practices. Imagine an identical law introduced in Poland. For “dunity” let us put “Polishness”, for classes of Christian traditions – “Catholicism of the Catholic Church”, and for “non-Dunians”, “non-Poles”. What an outrage it would be if people of another nationalities were evicted over the Vistula.

♪ I don't know ♪

Nationals.net/ies.lublin.pl