The peculiar services coordinator's surroundings responds that the letter was dated on February 25 and raised no questions for 23 days. Czarzasty himself maintains that the ABW study cleared him, and an additional survey present has no legal basis, due to the fact that the talker of the Sejm is excluded from specified a procedure by law.
What do we know about ABW's writing?
President's spokesperson Rafał Leśkiewicz informed that the President's Chancellery had received a letter from the Head of the ABW regarding the talker of the Sejm and his relation with the citizens of the Russian Federation. According to Leśkiewicz, the paper "does not supply explanations", or alternatively "puts out further questions". In the same entry, the spokesperson called on Vladimir Czarzasty to complete a individual safety survey, arguing that only a formal checking procedure gives the basis for a "soundly verified" service.
A fewer hours later, Jacek Dobrzyński, a spokesperson for the Minister of peculiar Services, responded. He stated that ABW's letter to the NRP was dated on 25 February 2026 and accused the Palace that for 23 days he had raised no questions or objections.
Black guy says the study cleared him.
The Marshal of the Sejm on Thursday morning at TOK FM confirmed that about a period ago the ABW provided a report, among others, to the Presidential Palace. According to him, the material shows that it is "super clean", and the president should apologize to him for his earlier suggestions for "eastern contacts". Czarzasty stressed that he himself requested specified a study erstwhile the president's environment demanded it.
– I have been informed by the service: "You have no contact with anyone who threatens Poland, no 1 around you is misdirected, no 1 is simply a spy." due to the fact that if it was, due to the fact that I am under permanent counterintelligence protection, it would be said to me, "Please don't ask this person," said Czarzasty.
What's the game truly about?
The core of the conflict, however, is not the existence of the ABW magazine itself, but the question whether the Marshal of the Sejm should go through a classical safety survey. The Palace and the Sejm present present completely different positions on this subject. Leśkiewicz argues that president Karol Nawrocki went through this procedure 3 times, so the same standard should besides apply to the another individual in the country.
The office of the Sejm has been replying for respective weeks that the anticipation of specified a survey from the marshal results either from a deficiency of knowing of the regulations or from misleading the public. The Marshal of the Sejm has access to classified information by law, is subject to permanent counter-intelligence protection and has asked for additional verification of his contacts, after which no objections were raised against him.
The law firm of the Sejm besides added that if the marshal had tried to apply to the ABW for verification in the average survey procedure, the agency would gotta refuse, citing Article 34 of the Act on the Protection of Confidential Information.
What does the safety of Classified Information Act say?
The current text of the Act on the protection of classified information clearly shows that the examination proceedings are not carried out against the president of the Republic of Poland, Marshal of the Sejm, Marshal of the Senate, president of the Council of Ministers and members of the Council of Ministers. This catalogue is contained in Article 34(10) of the Act. This means that people presently performing these functions are excluded from the classical checking mode which the Palace is talking about.
However, the same bill shows where all this confusion comes from. Article 34(12) to (15) provides for examination procedures for candidates for a number of state posts, as well as circumstantial rules for Members and Senators erstwhile access to classified information related to a circumstantial function is required.
