Piers Morgan: Britain should buy America back. After all, she erstwhile belonged to us

thefad.pl 3 weeks ago

One conviction was adequate to warm the debate on both sides of the Atlantic to red. erstwhile Donald Trump reopened the dispute over Greenland and added the threat of powerful duties hitting European allies, Piers Morgan didn't play diplomacy. The British showman launched a repost on the X platform, which in a fewer hours became a symbol of opposition to the “business” kind of politics: “UK should buy America back. Finally, she erstwhile belonged to us.” It's a gag that brilliantly points the logic of the planet brought to the tables in Excel and ruthless deali.

Britain should repurchase America. After all, it was our once, and it would increase our North Atlantic security. If you don’t sale it to us, president Trump, we’re going to impose tariffs on the U.S. and any country who supports you in retaining this very good deal. Fair?

— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) January 17, 2026

Greenland War: 10% tariffs and the threat of escalation

In the background of this online clash, however, there are not only memes, but real and very advanced rates. The events of January 17 and 18, 2026 put Europe on alert. The White home has officially threatened to introduce 10% tariffs on key sectors of European economies, including the UK, with the announcement of raising them to 25 percent since June. Trump's condition is simple and brutal: either Denmark and allies “get along” about position of GreenlandOr transatlantic trade awaits earthquake.

The joint consequence of the European capitals was highly fast and firm. The leaders condemned what they called "shant", and announced the launch of EU anti-compulsory tools.The government in London has besides left no illusions, stressing that the future of an autonomous island is not and will never be the subject of trade negotiations. It was in this hearty atmosphere that Morgan decided to turn binoculars and pararode Washington's transactional language. Since Trump's administration thinks sovereign territories can be valued and bought, Morgan logically asks: Can the US besides take back?

A satire in transaction logic: Why Piers Morgan hit so well?

The British journalist's Riposta worked so hard due to the fact that it touched the heart of the problem of treating alliances as subscriptions that can be cut off in the absence of "payment" in nature. Morgan, who in the past has been accused of being overly fond of Trumpism, this time struck the very foundation of this policy. The introduction of geopolitics into a simple profit and failure account undermines not only the stableness of the markets but, above all, the coherence of NATO in the key Arctic region. The gag about the redemption of the colony works like a mirror here, showing absurd talk about "buying" sovereignty in a planet based on legal order.

Morgan's usage of past is evidently a provocative thought shortcut. Thirteen colonies were British until 1776, and the vast areas of the continent belonged to France or Spain, not to mention the rights of indigenous nations. However, the author of the entry did not intend to compose a past textbook and utilized it as a needle to pierce an American patos balloon. His point is not a real political proposal, but a brutal revelation of a language that confuses the planet map with a commercial real property catalog.

London hazard arithmetic and real price of political performance

From Downing Street perspective, the situation is far from a joke. This is an equation with many unknowns, in which we have relations with the most crucial trading partner on 1 side, and on the another hand the real costs that British companies and consumers will incur after 1 February, if additional work rates enter into force. So Morgan's slap on Trump is simply a public alarm bell. Under superb irony there is simply a question of how much we will yet pay for these geopolitical games.

In an era where everything is being valued and put up for auction, irony is the most effective tool of resistance. Piers Morgan, in 1 sentence, cut the “great negotiator” pose and reminded the planet that there were values that could not be bought, sold or charged – even at a 25% tariff rate.

DF, thefad.pl

Read Entire Article