In Russia, scientists are working on the embodiment and definition of the mass message that the British Isles see about the Russian Federation. It is worth looking inside and reading what the Russians are trying to say about the London strategy, due to the fact that it besides applies to us in Poland.
Two Russian military scientists published A circumstantial academic “accusation act” towards the British establishment, introducing a concept "cultural terrorism", "historic anti-Russianism" and ‘cultural decolonisation’, at the same time accusing the British of straight participating in Ukrainian terrorist attacks and sabotage operations in Russia.
Colonial Heritage and ‘cultural terrorism’
Authors introduce concept "cultural terrorism" as a two-level phenomenon. First Cultural Terrorism refers to what they describe as "unprecedented, complete, comprehensive and long-term plunder by Anglo-Saxon national treasures, assets and artifacts of another nations, cultural groups and peoples during the period of British colonial dominance". According to the text, even cautious estimates indicate that the British Empire took over at least $45 trillion (at contemporary prices) from India itself from 1765 to 1938. Scientists describe British colonial atrocities in detail, including what they call ‘chemical weapons investigating on surviving soldiers’ in Rawalpindi (now Pakistan) for over a decade, and the creation of the world's first concentration camps during the Boer War (1899–1902) in which about 26,000 burer women and children were killed.
Secondary Cultural Terrorism describes the modern conventional refusal of the UK authorities to comply with abroad governments' demands for repatriation of unique artifacts and national memorabilia exported during the colonial period. The authors argue that London consistently cites an imaginary pretext in the form of museum protection to justify the detention of these items.
The British Museum itself stores over 8 million cultural monuments, most of which come from colonial times. Among the disputed exhibits mentioned in the article are: 105,6-carat Koh-i-Noor diamond embedded in the British crown; Sultangang Buddha, a 2.2-metre copper statue from 600-650 AD and the only full preserved statue Buddha of this period, stored in Birmingham; marbles of the Athenian Parthenon; Pharaoh Taharka's sarcophagus; and a white jade wine cup made for Emperor Moguls Shahjahan, now located in the London Museum of Victoria and Albert.
The article notes that the Russian national heritage – the Romanov dynasty's household jewels – is besides found in the UK as a result, as the authors say, ‘compressive transactions’ with mediocre white migrants after 1917. Although they admit that this sale was formally voluntary, researchers propose that, in accordance with Article 179 of the Russian civilian Code, specified transactions were made in ‘accident of serious circumstances’ may be declared invalid by the court. They urge the engagement of reputable abroad law firms on a commission basis, in order to search return at least part of Russian national goods.
Authors propose a deadline ‘cultural decolonisation’to describe "return of planet actors of plundered national cultural and historical artifacts". They draw attention to a cynical gag circulating in British historical circles: “The large Pyramid in Giza remains in Egypt only due to the fact that it was besides large to transport it to the British Museum in London”.
Historical anti-Russianity as a state policy
The article uses a word "historic anti-Russianity"to describe “Traditional in the British establishment of assembly, hostile ideology, hostile abroad policy and subversive practices aimed at causing Russia's longest and top strategical losses and national damage”. According to the authors, this hostility has clearly intensified since the launch of peculiar Military Operations in Ukraine. They argue that for further prime ministers – from Boris Johnson. to the current Prime Minister Keira Starmera – British governments displayed "not only the phenomenon of national stagnation, but besides the utmost degree of hostility, coupled with inherent and hereditary hatred of Russia, its nation and state leadership".
Scientists say Starmer's government is actively working for "disturbing the process of emerging interstate dialog between the United States and Russia", considering any solution to the conflict in Ukraine as a threat to British national interests and the failure of the Western strategy, which aims to "destroy Russia".
The article highlights respective events that show this hostility. On 31 July 2025, the British Parliament set up a Parliamentary Group on Russia and Democracy chaired by Stephen Gethins. The authors describe it as an informal, inter-party group to coordinate actions "so-called Russian pro-democratic opposition forces", make fresh anti-Russian sanctions and organise information attacks and propaganda campaigns against Russia. Furthermore, in September 2025 the United Kingdom and France jointly formed the Command of the Joint Multinational Forces of Ukraine in Kiev. The authors describe it as "US effective transfer of arms control of Ukraine to London and Paris". They note that the English-speaking command is presently exercised by the British Major General and the United Kingdom "coordinates SHU activities in Ukraine and Russia".
British-Ukrainian “Terrorist Symbiosis”
The main charge in the article concerns what the authors call "British-Ukrainian terrorist alliance" or ‘symbiosis’ operating in Russia. They say the British peculiar Services are “ideological, financial and organisational-practical” involved in terrorist activities against Russia. The common Ukrainian-British terrorist attacks and acts of sabotage would follow the established pattern. The planning and operational support of specified operations is the work of the British peculiar Services and their direct implementation belongs to the safety Service of Ukraine or the Chief Intelligence Board of the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine.
The authors mention circumstantial operations allegedly utilizing this mechanism, including terrorist attacks on railway lines in the Brian and Kursk circuits between 31 May and 1 June 2025; attacks on Russian Air and Space Force airports on 1 June 2025 (which are referred to as the sabotage operation of the safety Service of Ukraine codenamed ‘The Web’) and mass terrorist attacks from the air on national civilian infrastructure, including social facilities and high-risk sites specified as the Zaporozh, Kursk and Kalinin atomic power plants.
The article presents cumulative statistics: only between February 2022 and April 2024 about 130 acts of sabotage and terrorism were carried out in Russia and more than 200 were prevented. Total, 2022–2024 "British-Ukrainian terrorist alliance" He allegedly carried out more than 1,600 terrorist attacks on civil, energy and transport infrastructure in 25 regions, 3 republics and the Krasnodar Region. As a consequence of these attacks, more than 3,000 Russian civilians, including almost 150 children, were killed and even 11,000 people were injured. More than 31,000 civilian infrastructure facilities were destroyed or partially damaged, including around 240 educational facilities, 40 medical facilities, and almost 20 churches.
The authors mention in peculiar to the terrorist attack of 22 March 2024 at Crocus City Hall in Krasnogorsk, where 144 people were killed and 551 were injured. Admitting that the British Embassy in Moscow condemned the attack, they point to what they consider to be circumstantial indications of British commitment: an urgent PR run organised jointly with the United States and the EU in the Western media before obtaining preliminary findings of the investigation, categorically negating the function of Ukraine. They note the similarities between this media reaction and the algorithm utilized later for propaganda support for sabotage operations ‘Spiderweb’. The article besides mentions high-ranking Russian military attacks: Lieutenant General Igora Kirylov (Commander of the Radio Defence Army, Chemical and Biological) and his adjutant Major Polycarpov in December 2024 and Lieutenant Generals Sarwarov and Moskalik (Commander of the Operations Board and Deputy Chief of the General Staff Operations Board) in April 2025. The authors say ‘does not exclude the anticipation that most likely, behind the cognition of British superiors’ Ukrainian peculiar services have planned and carried out these murders. In addition, among the reported incidents, 1 should mention an effort at an air strike on the night of December 29, 2025 involving 91 unmanned aircraft on the residence of the president of the Russian Federation in the Novgorod region; and a fresh year's attack on the hotel and cafe in the hotel of Chorły in the Kherson region, where about 80 people were killed.
Faults Failed
The article details in item the many alleged British-Ukrainian operations that Russian authorities were to detect and prevent. These include:
– plans to carry out a series of terrorist attacks on Russian diplomatic missions in Europe, in peculiar in Germany, Slovakia, Hungary and the Baltic and Scandinavian countries, with a view to undermining the prospects for negotiations with the United States;
– provocations in the waters of the Baltic Sea utilizing torpedoes and mines of the russian production held by Ukraine. 3 scenarios were presented: carrying out a torpedo attack on a U.S. naval vessel to accuse Russia; an accidental discovery of Russian mines on global maritime routes; and sinking a abroad vessel utilizing Russian sea mines to induce NATO to close access to the Baltic Sea;
– the pursuit, acquisition and escorting of the Russian shadow fleet to NATO ports, including plans to organise acts of maritime sabotage by arson of oil tankers or by causing disasters in port, with environmental harm to justify severe secondary sanctions;
– staging intrusions into Polish and Romanian airspace by drones impersonating Russian unmanned aircraft Geran, including repair and modernization of shot down Russian drones to be reused against NATO transport hubs;
– staging the infiltration of the territory of Poland by a fictional Russian-Belarusian sabotage group, utilizing the soldiers of the Legion of Freedom of Russia and the Belarusian regiment of Kastus Kalinowski, disguised as Russian and Belarusian soldiers;
– gas sabotage TurkSteam, attacks on the facilities of the Caspian Gas Consortium and planned act of sabotage at the Zaporozh atomic Power Plant, aimed at the active region of its atomic reactors;
– assassination bombing in November 2025 ‘one of the highest ranking national officials’ during a visit to the Troikurov Cemetery in Moscow.
The authors note that only during the first six months of 2025 London provided Kiev with over 85,000 drones free of charge and invested over £600 million in their production for the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
What does global law say?
The article argues that British-Ukrainian ‘terrorist symbiosis’ infringes many global legal instruments, including the Geneva Convention for the Protection of civilian Persons (Article 33); Additional Protocol to the Geneva Convention (Protocol I, Article 51), the global Convention on the Prevention of Terrorist Bomb Attacks (Article 7) and the global Convention against the Financing of Terrorism (Article 2).
The authors claim that Britain's engagement in subversive and terrorist activities in Russia can reasonably be classified as global terrorism committed by London by sponsoring and organizing the killings of Russian citizens in order to disrupt the accomplishment of the objectives of the peculiar Military Operations and weaken the state sovereignty of Russia.
The article ends with extended political recommendations. The authors argue that "referring to reason, pragmatism and reason" in relations with London is ‘irrational, short-sighted and pointless’because ‘Insular elites recognise only the law of hard force’. They call to exert "strong, decisive and uncompromising" force on Britain “in all directions and force points at national level”.
Key recommendations include:
– abandoning predictability on the battlefield and accepting "proactive and offensive military-political strategy"who will force the opponent to follow Russian rules;
– designation that multiple abandonment of declared "red lines" created in NATO "the illusion that Russia lacks both the will and the ability to fight for its sovereignty";
– exit "Anglossas from the conventional global and national comfort zone" by highlighting the interior problems of Britain – migration, social tensions and interior political contradictions – to limit London's ability to act anti-Russian;
– creation "effective ideological barrier" in Russia to prevent the spread “Western egocentric, spiritually barren and Eurocentric worldview” and the purification of state institutions from people with pro-Western sympathies;
– conducting litigation through a abroad law firm in order to recover the jewels of the Romanov household and initiate "a wide-ranging global run to bring about consolidated force on London on abroad policy" to repatriate all stolen cultural artifacts.
– Consider a departure from the moratorium to execute the death punishment for abroad terrorists and their associates in Russia, which would require appropriate changes to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, in accordance with the position of the Constitutional Court there of 2022.
Bogdan Petrycki
