Just us. Ziobro o Heath: “This is simply a bad man”

news.5v.pl 3 months ago

From a formal point of view, that's not precisely a appropriate question. I'm sorry, I'm going to gotta argue due to the fact that the committee of enquiry has asked to arrest me for the purposes of the committee in June, so even if this decision is made, there is no danger that I will be arrested on Monday and taken out in handcuffs wherever I am, only that the decision will be taken to deprive me of my freedom for the intent of gathering in June. The court is bound by the committee's motion, so I don't think that this threat exists here anymore" – said erstwhile MS chief, erstwhile lawyer General Zbigniew Ziobro on tv in Poland24 asked whether he would be in Poland during the court gathering on his detention.

Law and Justice presented an extended analysis of the protocol from the proceeding of Barbara Violin, pointing to a number of irregularities

"Sp. Barbara Skrzypek died due to the fact that she was harassed by political hatchers. They wanted to force evidence incriminating the president of the Law and Justices, so they organized a proceeding resembling the times of the commune — without the presence of a proxy, for which she had full right, and without recording, so that no 1 would know how many violations they committed against the witness”

— wrote on the X platform Zbigniew Ziobro, Vice president of Law and Justice.

SEE ALSO:The PiS reveals a detailed analysis of Barbara Fiddler's interrogation! "Tusk and Bodnar bear work for death"

Strong comment Ziobry

Zbigniew Ziobro told more about this case on tv in Poland24 in the program "Poland Chooses".

Above all, I have been affected by the mass of various violations of law, which can be found in specified a prosaic and simple act as questioning a witness. To be honest, for 10 years together, I have been the lawyer General, and I have never encountered any situation in which a simple proceeding of a witness would be subjected to specified a devastating criticism by demonstrating many violations of the procedure which the witness has been entitled to defend his powers, through manipulation, by making a mistake, the failure of specified a hearing

“ He explained.

Yes, they happen – I will not deny it – various inaccuracies, inaccuracies, but here the scale is impressive. And what is most striking, and even shocking, is that if Mrs. Barbara's lawyer admitted that she had major wellness problems, that she was upset, but above all she had a problem with her eyesight, which means that she would not be able to read the protocol or the key content that is applicable to the course of the proceedings, it was clear how 2 + 2 = 4, so to talk mathematically, that she was entitled to the presence of a individual who guaranteed assurance in the protocol and would follow that this signature would be filed under what she truly said

“ He pointed out.

Lies

Ewa Wrzosek’s refusal to be present in the proceeding motivated that the prosecutor may refuse to be allowed to take part in the proceedings of the typical if he considers that this does not require the defence of the interests of the non-party. The point is, the late Barbara Fiddler wasn't a side, she was a witness.

This is besides a lie by the way, and they know they are manipulating. I have consulted this situation with colleagues who have eaten their teeth in this kind of conduct and have pointed out to me that the witness has been instructed here not only from the classical regulation of false testimony, but besides from the additional regulation 233 1a. (... It's not done, it's above standard. That's what you do erstwhile and only if the D.A. assumes that it could be a threat to the witness in case he makes false accounts as a witness.

— he said.

Even here, they're manipulating, due to the fact that if they did, then the D.A. wouldn't have warned Barbara Fiddler in Article 233 paragraph 1a.

“He said.

Bad Man

Speaking of prosecutor Ewa Wrzosek, Zbigniew Ziobro reminded her of scandalous words that came out almost a year ago during her interview with “Politics”, where she argued that “we are surviving in postwar times, where “bands roam the woods”, the state is inactive at hazard and must act in a non-standard way”.

SEE ALSO:The 2024 interview of Wrzosek was recalled. Did she compare herself to Stalinist prosecutors? “Initially I couldn’t believe”

This woman was able to say that the current government should behave as an agentry established here on russian bayonets after 45, which dealt with the “forest bands”, she said, which means we are forest bands...

“remembered.

She's repeating this narrative, and I'm not talking about the toupee, I'm talking about the bad guy. She's committing a de facto crime. She actually praises the crimes that were committed by the apparatus of repression, due to the fact that that prosecutor's office served primarily at the time to destruct people, to accuse falsely, to even bring to conviction the death punishment and how many and she praises it, gives as an example, a mention to the metaphor

“ He pointed out.

The presence of Ziobra

A spokesperson for the Warsaw SO justice Anna Ptaśek informed that the gathering concerning the request of the parliamentary committee of enquiry for arrest against Zbigniew Ziobra will be held with representatives of the parties – the committee and the minister. The court will deal with the motion on Monday, March 31. The decision of Ziobra will be taken by the judge, who in the past has already made controversial decisions beneficial to those who fought against the then regulation of law and justice – justice Tomasz Grochowicz.

SEE ALSO:It's time for the Ziobra detention. The decision will be taken by a justice known for his controversial decisions in loud cases

Zbigniew Ziobro was asked on tv in Poland24 whether he would be in Poland on Monday.

From a formal point of view, that's not precisely a appropriate question. I'm sorry, I'm going to gotta argue due to the fact that the committee of enquiry has asked to arrest me for the purposes of the committee in June, so even if this decision is made, there is no danger that I will be arrested on Monday and taken out in handcuffs wherever I am, only that the decision will be taken to deprive me of my freedom for the intent of gathering in June. The court is bound by the committee's motion, so I don't think there's any more danger here.

“He said.

Read Entire Article