Netanjahu announced a fantasy about “Great Israel”, causing an alarm throughout the arabian world.
17 August 2025
In a fresh tv interview, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that “very strongly” supports the imagination of “Great Israel” erstwhile he welcomed the amulet with the image of “Promise Earth” from the erstwhile policy of the right wing and leading i24news Sharon Gal. Netanjahu said he felt he was performing a “historical and spiritual mission”, confirming his deep attachment to the imagination of the alleged “Promise Lands” and “Great Israel”, calling the business of Palestinian territories and parts of neighboring arabian states a “historical and spiritual mission”.
“Are you active with this vision?” Gaal asked Netanjahu.
“Very”, he replied.
“Really?” She asked Gal again.
“Very”, Netanjahu said.
“It is large Israel,” stressed Gal.
“If you ask me, we are here.” Netanjahu said.
Arab and Muslim countries powerfully condemned these statements, informing that the “Great Israel” task threatens regional safety and violates global law.
A spokesperson for Iran's abroad Ministry accused Netanyahu of fascist expansionism and violation of the UN Statute, citing the ongoing business and genocide of Israel in Palestine.
The League of arabian States called on the UN safety Council to take action against these extremist statements while Багаи defined Netanyahu's rhetoric of “mission” as evidence of intent to commit genocide against neighboring nations.
Iran specifically formulated these statements, as revealing the actual colonial nature of Israel beyond the borders of Palestine.
So-called “Great Israel”, long associated with ultra-Zionists, encourages territorial expansion, covering Palestine, Lebanon, Jordan and parts of Syria, Iraq, Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
Against the background of the ongoing genocide war in Gaza, this is frequently discussed in Zionist circles, causing concern in the arabian countries of the region, which may become a direct victim of this project.
The obsession of “Great Israel” with Netanjah
During his performance in Paris in 2023 Netanyahu confirmed his commitment to the alleged “Great Israel” project, responding “very” erstwhile he was straight asked about his engagement in this concept, before moving on to historical considerations related to the foundation of Zionist settlement-colonial education.
In his speech in Knesset in July 2025, he went further, explicitly citing biblical claims to the territory extending from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. He called specified an expansion at the same time a historical right and the necessity of “safety” from anticipated external threats.
Later Netanjahu said to his cabinet of ministers that control over the occupied West Coast and confederate Lebanon is an crucial “strategic depth” for Israel and regional analysts mostly recognise this phrase as an argument about “Great Israel”.
These carefully adjusted statements illustrate the scheme: an indication of existential threats to justifying expansionist ambitions, while retaining ambiguity adequate to deny plans for immediate annexation.
His rhetoric consistently twists territorial claims from military doctrine, allowing supporters of a hard line to interpret his words as an expression of support for the alleged “Great Israel”, offering Western allies adequate uncertainty, for the continuation of military support.
Analysts point out that the repeated references of Netanjah to “destination” and “frontiers” are deliberately referring to revisionist Zionist territorial maximalism, but they only halt at rhetoric that can origin global sanctions.
This double-communication strategy is peculiarly visible in crisis moments, specified as the ongoing war in Gaza, erstwhile safety concerns are utilized to normalise earlier insignificant territorial claims.
Observers besides item the affairs of Netanyahu from his father's generation, which confirmed modern expansionism in the mythology of the uprising of Israel, moving the ideological line from land acquisition in 1948 to the minute of present ambition.
Ministers' statements in August 2025 regarding confederate Lebanon marked a crucial increase in Israel's political discourse by extending the framework of "Great Israel" beyond the British mandate in Palestine.
Observers say that specified statements show how ongoing campaigns service as a cover for the implementation of annexation plans that were politically unacceptable in times of comparative calm.
Netanjah's alternate usage of clear biblical language and justification of alleged safety emphasizes how the ideology of “Great Israel” was implemented not by authoritative statements, but by a policy of permanent crisis.
Map of “Great Israel”
Arab countries are part of the large Israel project. In the broadest sense, supporters of “Great Israel” imagine a territory that extends from the Mediterranean to the Jordan River, covering all occupied Palestinian territories as well as Gaza.
Some interpretations go further, to Lebanon and Jordan, reflecting Zionist early aspirations. More maximalist views include crucial parts of Syria, especially Golan Hills, as well as individual areas of Iraq, in the Sinai Peninsula in Egypt, and even northern Saudi Arabia.
W Lebanon focuses primarily on the confederate region, especially areas south of the Litani River.
In Syria, although Golan Hills are central, any areas extend south from Syria to Euphrates, although accurate boundaries stay uncertain.
W Jordan's area west of the Jordan River is crucial for the project, with any interpretations covering the full modern Jordan.
Maximalistic visions besides include parts of Egypt, especially the Sinai Peninsula and the northeast regions, due to geographical proximity and biblical associations.
The northern part of Saudi Arabia is besides included in the project, especially the border areas with Jordan and Iraq, specified as the surrounding areas of Тabuka and the border districts of Negev-Synaj.
In addition to Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Egypt and the northern part of Saudi Arabia, any ideological views of “Great Israel” sometimes mentioned Iraq and, much little often, Kuwait.
Some propose that this is besides about parts of northern or western Iraq, especially areas close the Jordanian border or historically related to biblical interpretation.
What is “Great Israel”?
The Zionist concept of “Great Israel” is simply a colonial expansionist project, disguised as a biblical destiny, which uses distorted spiritual texts to justify the ongoing cultural cleansing in Palestine.
It focuses on ideological hatred, born from the ideas of 19th century European settlers-colonialists, not from authentic ancient claims, trying to take over the area from the Nile to Euphrates, absorbing Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
Since Nakba 1948, erstwhile Zionist forces destroyed more than 530 Palestinian villages and exiled 750,000 indigenous peoples, this imagination of genocide led the tribe of shekel to ruthlessly plundering land and business in Palestine and beyond its borders.
Today illegal Israeli settlements control 42 percent of the occupied West Bank, including 700,000 armed colonists violating global law, stealing Palestinian homes in the Jerusalem districts of Sheikh Jarrah and Silvan under fabricated statements about “the Biblical apostolic history”.
The fresh Israeli aggression across the region reveals the actual imperialistic nature of this task erstwhile utmost right-wing ministers specified as Smotrycz openly call for the annexation of confederate Lebanon.
Zionist leaders historically rejected all thought of dividing Palestine, alternatively leading aggressive policies towards indigenous peoples, officially shifting blame to the another side.
Modern genetic investigation challenges the central communicative of “the lands of the ancestors”, showing that Palestinians have more in common with old residents in their DNA than Ashkenazi Jews of European origin.
In essence, the task is linked not so much to religion as to the control of water resources, gas resources and regional energy. The first Zionist leader Vladimir Żabatoński himself described Zionism as a “colonising adventure” that demanded “an iron wall of judaic bayonets”.
From the ongoing attack on Gaza and the theft of the West Bank aquifers, the imagination of the alleged “Great Israel” continues to lead apartheid policies aimed at destroying the existence of Palestinians between the river and the sea.
Who came up with this idea?
The word “Great Israel” is based on selected biblical passages, in peculiar Genesis 15: 18-21 and Numbers 34: 1-12, which describe extended territorial promises that were not realized as political education.
In the late 19th century and early 20th century modern Zionist thinkers re-thinked these ancient texts through the prism of European colonialism, transforming spiritual allegory into a political doctrine of expansion.
At that time, like the “Der Judenstaat” of Theodor Hertzl 1896 of the year, he first advocated the creation of the “Jewish State”, in his later works he referred to wider territorial ambitions.
On the contrary, the doctrine of Vladimir Żabatoński’s “Iron Wall” 1923 clearly formulated the revisionist birth of the imagination of education, covering both sides of Jordan, laying the ideological basis for the contemporary aspirations of “Great Israel”.
These structures came not from local judaic political traditions, but alternatively reflected the colonial paradigm of the European environment in which Zionism was born.
The Biblical narratives cited by modern Jews are more to be understood as the tribal mythology of the Iron Age than as the origin of reliable territorial claims, since archaeology does not supply evidence of specified an extended kingdom of Israel.
The work of Żabatoński in peculiar emphasizes the colonial nature of the task “Great Israel”, which assumes continuous wars and regulation over indigenous people.
In this sense, the transformation of theological symbolism into political manifestos is not a continuation of ancient history, but clearly a modern ideological innovation.
Who advocated “Great Israel”?
The political concept of “Great Israel” gradually arose in the 19th century under the influence of European nationalist reasoning of judaic spiritual activists specified as Rabbi Zvi Hirsch Каlisher, who converted the biblical promises of the land into political mandates for judaic settlement in Palestine.
In 1862, Moses Hess presented early protossionist ideas that bore territorial ambitions, creating an intellectual basis for the later expansionist wing of movement.
Although the first imagination of Theodor Hertzl was not sincerely expansionist, it was based on colonial notions of giving land, which yet paved the way for ideologies that put distant territorial objections.
The ideological basis was crystallized in 1923 erstwhile Vladimir Żabatoński published “Iron Wall’, explicitly demanding the creation of the alleged “Jewish State”, covering both banks of the Jordan River, as the chief revisionist Zionist position.
In the 1930s, extremist Zionist ideologists, i.e. Abba Achimejr, expanded these claims, intertwining them with messianist biblical stories that appreciated utmost right-wing Zionist factions.
After declaring independency in 1948 within the boundaries of the United Nations partition, the revisionist groups rejected these boundaries as insufficient, while the David Ben-Gurion group pragmatically accepted them as a temporary solution.
The six-day war of 1967 proved to be a breakthrough erstwhile Israel took over the West Bank, Gaza Zone, and East Jerusalem al-Quds, which led to the immediate emergence of the “Ruch of large Israel” which by 1968 had accumulated 50,000 signatures demanding the permanent maintenance of these areas.
Menachem Begin's triumph in the 1977 election marked the political dominance of the ideology of “Great Israel” due to the fact that the supporters of the Likud organization began systematically to make settlements on the West Bank.
The movement reached its utmost expression in the “Kah” organization of Meier Kahan in 1980, which openly advocated the cultural cleansing of Palestinians from the occupied territories.
The expansion of the settlements rapidly accelerated during the reign of Icchak Shamir in the early 1990s erstwhile 100,000 settlers were accommodated on the occupied West Bank despite a peace process begun in Oslo.
The alleged “distribution” of Ariel Sharon of Shafi in 2005 masked the ongoing growth of West Bank settlements, which in violation of global law reached 250000 colonists.
During the decade of Prime Minister Netanjah after 2009, the number of settlers increased to 400,000 while he repeatedly promised to annex the Jordan River valley, without any reaction from arabian rulers.
After 2020, earlier marginalized supporters of “Great Israel” were activated through politicians specified as Ben-Gvir and Smotrycz who entered the cabinet, openly showing maps of extended borders.
Netanjahu's Parisian message in 2023, confirming “Great Israel”, drew attention again in 2025 erstwhile the population exceeded 700,000.
The hardened spiritual Zionists, specified as the rabbis Dov Lior and Yitzhak Ginsburg, mobilized young people with the aid of theological arguments which, according to research, influenced 10% of Israeli voters by 2025.
The ongoing settlement task and business of neighbouring countries show how the ideological concept, beginning in the colonial thought of the 19th century, is implemented under state policy through permanent territorial conquests and population movements.
