Stone—"Do you truly believe that Tucker, Marjorie Taylor Green, Thomas Massie and Candace Owens can say what they say without the consent of a individual in office?"
Makov's reservation – A clearly fresh political organization that rejects (((double citizenship))) and candidates receiving AIPAC money is the only way for the US. I disagree with Mike. Tucker Carlson and his associates are brave patriots who deserve our full support. They don't deserve this article.
What do you think? ([email protected])
author: Mike Stone
As you may have heard, Tucker Carlson Prepares to establish its own political party. He is supported by Marjorie Taylor Green, Thomas Massie and others.
Last week, Tucker published a "manifest" of his party, a ten-point plan that, among another things, openly accuses Israel of forcing the United States into war with Iran.
Nothing is reported in mainstream media or alternate media unless individual with money and power wants it to be reported. This is peculiarly about politics. There is no specified thing as political movement that begins or flourishes organically. And that concerns Tucker's fresh political party.
In the past, erstwhile people at the initiative of America First attempted to gain political popularity, as Father Coughlin and Elizabeth Dilling in the past century, and late Andrew Anglin and his book clubs regular Stormer in that century, were crushed by opposing forces.
[Makov-Not really. By 1934 Coughlin was most likely the most crucial Catholic talker on political and financial issues. Its radio listeners were tens of millions of Americans all week. Historian Alan Brinkley wrote that "until 1934 [Coughlin] received regular more than 10,000 letters" and that "his authoritative staff sometimes counted more than a hundred."]
Seeing Tucker and his supporters get distant with what they are presently getting distant with, he tells you that there is serious money and political power behind them. individual with money and power wants Tucker and his organization in the foreground.
There's besides Tucker's individual story. After all, erstwhile did Tucker Carlson always do anything for altruistic reasons? erstwhile did he always do anything for individual another than himself?
At the tallness of his popularity at Fox News, he had the chance to tell the planet that Israel stood behind 9/11. I admit that this could end in firing him, which could so be unrealistic for us to expect. However, alternatively of hiding and ignoring the case, Tucker left openly and harshly criticized the fact movement at 9/11. They called them liars, charlatans, even worse. He actually helped hide the fact at 9/11.
Then something weird happened. Charlie Kirk was murdered, and in the blink of an eye Tucker Carlson began speaking negatively about Israel, moving even to the claim that they had prior cognition of 9/11. (Makov-No)
Candace Owens and others besides immediately switched after the "attack on Kirk" and began attacking Israel.
Do you truly believe that Tucker, Marjorie Taylor Green, Thomas Massie and Candace Owens can say what they say without the consent of a individual in power?
Do you truly believe that they are getting distant with attacking Israel while others with little influence are censored, cancelled, and banned for saying much milder things?
Who's behind the Tucker Slams?
If you accept the presumption that Tucker is not starting a fresh political organization due to the fact that he wants to save America, but due to the fact that individual in power is paying him for it, the question arises: Who pays him?
It's not "Jews." Not erstwhile Tucker criticizes Israel. Of course, there is simply a anticipation that he is paid to act as a controlled opposition. But the controlled opposition would not have gone as far as he has so far criticized Israel.
This is where it gets interesting. Who has the money, power and motivation to pay Tucker for criticizing Israel and setting up his own political party—a organization likely to exposure Thomas Massie to President?
Who has the money, power, and, most importantly, the influence to argue Israel and organized Jews?
It's not an individual due to the fact that no single individual has that level of power.
It's not a abroad country, due to the fact that no abroad country will profit from what Tucker proposes. In fact Canada, Mexico and all our alleged European allies would powerfully argue the political organization "America first of all".
So who is it? Any guesses?
Well, if you're a evidence man like me and believe, like I am, that Jeffrey Epstein's "suicide," Charlie Kirk's "attack" and our current "war" with Iran are false and gay, then the only logical answer is military intelligence.
Who else has the power to build the squad Tucker's made so far? (I'm certain Candace Owens will be there sooner or later.) Who else would dare to defy Israel—and live to tell about it? Who else would benefit from Tucker's fresh political party?
It must be military intelligence; White Hat's operation to gather all Trump supporters who have since turned distant from Trump, and all Trump's opponents who were against him from the beginning, into 1 camp.
Unless you truly believe that Tucker and his colleagues are doing what they do, completely alone, out of the goodness of their hearts, spending their own money to get it started, and not becoming completely confused by the Deep State. If so, I have a bridge in Baltimore I'd like to sale you.
-------
Mike Stone is the author of a fresh book "How to meet and attract girls..." and Why You Shouldn't and Teen Boy's Success Book: the eventual Self-Help Book for Boys; Everything you request to know to become a man
Related – Elizabeth regarded Judaism as satanic before the majority. This is her Talmud exegesis.
Translated by Google Translator
source:henrymakow.com
