A peculiarly crucial component of the inexpensive state was inexpensive justice. This is why 15-month referee courses were introduced alternatively of 5-year legal studies. On 14 May 1948, the T. Duracz Central School of Law was established, whose students received "education" during the two-year cycle, allowing them to service as judges. They weren't random people. The students of the Central School of Law could only be those seconded to school by the elder leadership of the Communist organization or Communist trade unions. specified judges were the guarantors for issuing righteous judgments. inexpensive educated people cared for a inexpensive country. They knew that prison sentences, especially prison sentences, put the cost of keeping prisoners at risk. Therefore, without hesitation, they issued death sentences on soldiers and underground activists of independence. Włodzimierz Ostapowicz (on photograph inside) issued about 300 death sentences, of which 180 were executed. Julian Giemborek (photo on the right), a Russian in Polish uniform, issued 125 death sentences. More than 100 was released by Mieczysław Widaj (photo first on the left), Filip Feld – 69, Wiktor Adamski (actually Altschüler) - 46, Aleksander Warecki (actually Warenhaupt) - 39, Michał Salpeter – 32. Nearly 30 death sentences are the "achievement" of Stefan Michnik, Adam's brother. These judges could be safely assigned to any crucial case. After all, they were graduates of the Central School of Law, whose successive directors Igor Andreyev and Gustav Auscaler, as judges of the ultimate Court, approved the death conviction given to Brigadier General in October 1952 August Emil Fieldorf “Nila”. Like teachers, like students.
The thought of a inexpensive state was pursued by the Chief Information Board, a counterintelligence body. 1 of GZI's “officers” told General Francis Skibinski, sentenced to death: “The courts in Poland are pic and photomontage. Here, in GZI, it's cut and sew. The courts are here to press our judgement and announce it”. The judges themselves were full aware of their role. justice Marian Barton defined the thought of inexpensive courts, which only “stretch judgments”: “We trust the UB that erstwhile they did the report, that means they investigated the case. We have assurance in them”.
After the 1956 “dehydration” the Chief Information Board was converted into Military interior Service Ministry of Defence. And so subsequent transformations and changes of the name of military and civilian units have established the thought of a inexpensive state and inexpensive courts. The continuation of this rule after 1989 was the motto proclaimed by Adam Strzembosz that "The judges will clear themselvesIt’s okay. ” It is clear that the cheapest form of purification is self-cleaning. inexpensive justice would have lasted the best if it had not been for the governments of the United Right between 2015 and 2023. We shortly saw how costly it was to appoint random judges for trial. This was, among others, the case of Sławomir Nowak. specified a random justice found that the money hidden in the dressing room, in Nowak's apartment, came from a robbery. And Nowak hid the money he earned from the robbery. He knew very well from his organization colleagues what Amber Gold and another parabankments were, so he preferred to deposit funds in socks and underpants. No interest, no risk. specified a random justice exposes the state to prolonged trials, appeals and, consequently, the request to pay advanced compensation to the suspect who becomes injured.
The summit of right-wing giantomania and failure to account for the costs was the introduction of the regulation of drawing the judges to each entering the proceeding of the case. After all, in addition to the hazard of drawing the incorrect justice and the costs involved, all courts had to be equipped with the right equipment, to make and implement appropriate procedures, and this in itself is contrary to the thought of a inexpensive state. This became peculiarly evident after the taking over of power by dinner on 13 December, erstwhile the innovative regulation of draw was introduced until the effect. The essential rule, due to the fact that not all justice is inclined to conviction an innocent priest to a long prison. And specified draws can proceed forever. It costs time, and you know time is money. But it's besides the power consumption, and the electricity, the greener, the more expensive. It is all the more reason to make the country cheaper and cheaper.
Finally, a real breakthrough was made in the random assignment of judges to individual cases. This is how the Polish paper revealed all day, in the territory Court in Warsaw, a justice was drawn to conduct trial in the Justice Fund. This is simply a prestigious trial, for now the main suspect is priest Michał Olszewski, but, in favorable court proceedings, the defendants may have a erstwhile minister of nomen omen of justice, or Zbigniew Ziobro himself. The draw was to take place out of 15 judges of the territory Court. However, in order to get the expected consequence of the drawing of justice Justyna Koski-Janusz, the draw could take weeks. That's why an epic breakthrough was made. Just before the draw, 14 judges of the territory Court were excluded from this draw, and thus the justice was drawn from Mrs Justyna Koski-Janusz to conduct this trial. As a consequence of specified a draw to lead the Justice Fund process, any expected, and for others it may have been a surprise, Mrs Justyna Koska-Janusz. I apologize for the usage of the phrase "Lost among Mrs Justyna Koski-Janusz", but Slovak writing “I want the tongue to be flexible to say everything the head thinks” did not anticipate the regulation of a fighting democracy. The ideas that swarm in the minds of today’s rulers will not talk any language, not even flexible.
This groundbreaking draw is an example of the return, after years of right-wing distortions, to what a good thought of a inexpensive state. But it's not the only savings it's got. Mrs. Justyna Koski-Janusz's draw is simply a real happiness. Ms Koska-Janusz was discussed by the Justice Ministry in 2016 about "failure to conduct a court caseIt’s okay. ” Your justice filed a suit against Zbigniew Ziobrze, a suit for “violation of individual propertyIt’s okay. ” As you know, no 1 can be a justice in their own case, not even a justice can be a justice in their own case. That's why Mrs. Justyna Koska-Janusz had to tremble until the last minute a justice would be drawn in her case. Now the situation is completely reversed. Mrs. Justyna Koska-Janusz is the elected justice who will justice Zbigniew Ziobra, whom she has late accused. Now it's her own business, too. Yet there are no formal and legal objections to being a prosecutor or a lawyer in his own case. And that's where the next savings come in. You won't request a prosecutor or a public defender. No 1 knows Zbigniew Ziobry better than Mrs Justyna Koska-Janusz. How fortunate she was drawn, and what savings. What a inexpensive country.
specified breakthrough innovations do not come out of nowhere, they are not random. individual must have invented it and implemented it. Therefore, I anticipate that the inexpensive state will appreciate Minister Adam Bodnar. An increase in wages, or even a sovia single bonus, generates costs, ZUS, taxes. It would be wasteful in a inexpensive country. So I anticipate this fortunate destiny to grin at Adm Bodnar, that he will win the lottery or the lottery. The draw would be long and costly until Bodnar's numbers were dropped on the ticket. Therefore, I anticipate that before the next lottery draw, all the balls with those numbers that Minister Adam Bodnar has not marked on his fortunate ticket will be removed from the draw. inexpensive State and how costly (to us) Minister.
After reading this text, individual may think that this column is absurd. No, it's not a column that's absurd, it's the reality that we live in is absurd.
Mr Bogdan
