Marcin Bogdan: Does the Church question the martyrdom of Blessed Fr Jerzy Popiełuszko ?

In fresh weeks, even in fresh days, there has been a peculiar intensification of events. There is fresh information which is the nature of leaks from the investigation, and there are actions which are the nature of protecting themselves from this information, which is the nature of disarming mines from their explosion. Is this exceptional intensification related to the release of the annex to the WSI liquidation study announced by the President's Chancellery? hard to say. Time will tell. Who knows.

In a nutshell, it can be said that many people active in the investigation tend to conclude that Fr Jerzy Popieluszko did not die on 19 October 1984. On that day, he was transported to military bunkers in Kazun, where through torture he was urged to cooperate with the services, and death occurred only a fewer days after the kidnapping, on October 25, 1984. There is simply quite a few information about this on the Internet, any of the investigation materials, including protocols from witness hearings are public and accessible to everyone. Anyone can get to know them and get an opinion. Many details are besides given in the latest book by the prosecutor Andrzej Witkowski "The Painful Mystery of Father Popieluszko". I'm not going to go over that information in detail.

A conference of members of the Bł. Jerzy Popiełuszko Museum technological Council in Warsaw organized by the Catholic Information Agency in the dynamics of the fresh days. The conference was attended by: prof. Paweł Skibiński, president of the Council, Paweł Kęska, typical of the Jerzy Popiełuszko Museum and Dr Tomasz Konopka, manager of the Department of Judicial medicine in Krakow. It would be expected that participants of this conference will mention to the public investigation materials collected over the past 40 years. Not only did they not mention to each other, but they showed a complete deficiency of cognition of the investigation. prof. Skibiński claimed that prof. Edmund Chróscielewski, who participated in the autopsy, had never been interviewed in the post-1990 investigation. 1 of the journalists, listeners of this conference, gave prof. Skibinski a signature of the file, where evidence from Prof. Chróścilewski before Prosecutor Witkowski is available. Shocking. So what was the subject of this conference?

The IPN resources found a film, a video from the autopsy of Fr Jerzy Popiełuszko. movie recorded on VHS tape, more than 40 years ago, with an adequate image quality time. The film, which was kept for many years at an unknown location, under unknown circumstances, by unknown persons. And this movie became the subject of a one-man evaluation by Dr. Tomasz Konopka. And these conclusions from the analysis of this film, I stress, alone, by Mr Konopka were the only subject of this conference. We were withdrawn by more than 40 years, until 1984, leaving aside another materials or evidence from an ongoing investigation. What conclusions did Dr. Tomasz Konopka scope after analyzing this film? He stated as follows: “If torture was used, it would be psychological, or interrogation. Real torture leaves real damage. There were no wounds on the body of the deceased.broken ribs, teeth or nose. There were only bloody runs in the skin and musclesIt’s okay. ” Those are shameful words. Those are words that shouldn't die. Those are words that shouldn't die, but they are. Mr Konopka stated that "death was due to a blockage of the advanced respiratory tract brutally pressed into the mouth with a gag” explaining that “The deficiency of binding of a loop around the neck, which was only ‘overlay’ through the neck, suggests that it was put on a corpse, the surviving would be tied more firmly so that it could not be released’. That would mean that the death of Fr George was an accident. The perpetrators wanted to gag the priest's mouth so he wouldn't scream, but they did so ineptly that the priest accidentally strangled himself. It's disgraceful. It is simply a public question of the martyrdom of Blessed Fr Jerzy Popiełuszko. And this questioning under the auspices of the Catholic Church.

Under the auspices of the Church, the account of the conference with specified a message appeared on the authoritative website of the Warsaw Archdiocese. As resonating boxes reproduced this message, Catholic media wrote: “The previously unknown materials confirm that Blessed Jerzy Popieluszko was murdered on October 19, 1984, and the origin of death was asphyxiationIt’s okay. ” In the contemporary past of Poland, the message of Catholic media was not so consistent with what was published by hostile Polish and Catholic Churches by leftist and liberal media. It can be seen that both Catholic and leftist journalists want to convince readers that Fr Jerzy died on October 19, despite the fact that many fresh evidence could prove otherwise. It's specified a Catholic-left alliance over divisions. What's that expected to do? surely not a search for the truth. The harmful consequences of this conference and these publications may be greater than the consequences of the last Episcopal letter on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of John Paul II's visit to the Roman Synagogue.

I wrote at the outset about the intensification of various events in the fresh period. This is the 15th of April. The Archdiocese of Warsaw issued a message, which fits into the communicative described. The Communication states: “In connection with the emerging practice of haunting the place of expected detention of Blessed Fr Jerzy Popiełuszko in Kazuñ, the Curia of the Warsaw Archdiocese reminds that the appropriate place of worship of Blessed in the Warsaw Archdiocese is the church of St. Stanislaw Kostka in Warsaw, Żoliborz". The question may be asked, did priest Primate Joseph Glemp not know that the Church of St. Stanislaus Kostka was the right place for worship in the bunker in Kazuñ? The Warsaw Curia communication besides states that “Pilgrims to the grave of Blessed Fr George can get peculiar graces in this place.” a ‘other places in the Warsaw Archdiocese, connected with the life or martyrdom of priest Popieluszko (actual or supposed), are not recognized by the Church as holy places". But can the curia find that in unrecognized places, I will add from myself, yet unrecognized as holy places, there is no peculiar grace? Is the place of prayer important, or is its zeal and religion in God’s grace and intercession of the saints and the blessed?

Clearly, any solstice is approaching. It seems as if on the 1 hand the fact was asking for full disclosure, and on the another hand it was desperately attempted to prevent it, in advance disproving the evidence that could be revealed. Is this related to the announced declassified annex to the WSI liquidation report? I don't know. Time will tell. I'm not going to mention and discuss any of the material or evidence that I've been making in my investigation. There's quite a few this, and the next fewer weeks can bring quite a few fresh information. I'm going to mention to another issue here, an highly crucial one. Many people ask why they would be called to hold and torture Fr Jerzy Popieluszko? Why would that serve? What was the purpose? Isn't murdering the Priest immediately after the kidnapping logical and consistent with the intent of the communist power, which simply wanted to silence the Priest?

In seeking answers to this question, let us callback the background of the events in question, and let us callback the national and global situation in the light of the facts we know today.

International situation

In 1981, an unsuccessful assassination of Pope John Paul II was carried out by inspiration and commissioned by the russian Union. The Holy Father recovered and became a real obstacle to communists in their ideological enslavement of human minds. On 13 May 1984, in the 50th day, precisely the fiftyth day after the dedication of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, a chain detonation occurred in the outskirts of Siewieromorska by the White Sea, the main ammunition depot of the russian North Fleet of Okolnaja. As a consequence of the losses suffered, the russian fleet lost military control in the Atlantic and ceased to number as a real fighting force. Read more about this in my book “The Last Years of Poland in Columns”. The russian Union, devoid of military force, was forced to diplomatic action, culminating in a pierestroika announced and implemented since March 1985 by Mikhail Gorbachev, the fresh russian leader. Gorbachev, deprived of military power, had to supply himself with a negotiating advantage, and a well-established agent in various countries, including the Vatican, was necessary.

National situation

In 1984, Poland, Poles, Poles' consciousness, were overran by Jaruzelski's tanks. The society was in deep apathy, empty shops and no prospects. The sermons of Fr Jerzy Popiełuszko did not warm up to fight, they were a cure for hopelessness, they encouraged, they helped survive. The martial law broke Poles, they were incapable to rebel, they posed no threat to power. Fr Jerzy Popieluszko, with his attitude, with his teaching, paradoxically, has gained any kind of safety guarantees. He was already besides well known, besides respected to be attributed to a fatal overdose of alcohol at a bus stop, as in the case of Father fresh Year's Eve Zycha. He was already besides well known, besides respected for people to believe in smoke as a consequence of the fire, as in the case of priest Stanisław Suchololec. He was already besides famous, besides respected, so that communist power could usage an unknown perpetrator. The sermons of Fr Jerzy Popiełuszko were uncomfortable for power, but the death or disappearance of the Priest would have been more dangerous. They could awaken Polish society from apathy.

Hypothesis

In specified realities, in specified an global and interior situation, national, the Satanic plan was born in the heads of communists. Satan's plan, due to the fact that their minds were possessed by Satan. This plan may have been as follows. During 1 of the trips, Fr Jerzy Popieluszko is kidnapped. But during the kidnapping, somehow, Waldemar Chrostowski, the priest's driver, escapes from the kidnappers. A individual in close proximity to the Priest, but in fact a confidant with the pseudonym “desperate”. If Chrostowski was a secret associate of SB, why would he run? It's the key to this Satanic plan, to legend the full concept. Chrostowski informs state services, which, thanks to his testimony, after a fewer days find the kidnapped and imprisoned Priest. Chrostowski becomes a hero, while Fr Jerzy is saved by officers who have made the kidnapping marked and possibly even finely punished. After these experiences, Fr Jerzy decides to go to Rome, which meets with natural knowing from the faithful. With knowing and full approval. In Rome he becomes immediately a close associate of the Holy Father. specified a Priest, with specified a history, after specified experiences, must be close to the Pope, the Holy Father must give the Pope full trust. Only no 1 knows that Fr Jerzy was found and released due to the fact that he agreed to cooperate with communist services. That was Satan's plan. 2 in one, getting free of an uncomfortable priest from Poland and placing a super agent in close proximity to the Holy Father. That plan was perfect, but it failed. He failed due to the fact that Fr Jerzy Popieluszko turned out to be steadfast. In the face of torture and martyrdom, he fulfilled Inka's will, Danusi Kodkówna, he behaved properly. To the communists, he became cursed. Chrostowski's testimony, which was to be the key to this Satanic plan, proved to be an obstacle to the cover-up. An emergency had to be created to hide the actual motives of the kidnapping. The founding lie of the 3rd Republic must have been created.

It's just a hypothesis. But before individual says that the only logical course of events was to execution the Priest immediately after the abduction, on October 19, let him first consider the above hypothesis. We owe it to Father George, we owe it to Blessed One, I trust to the Holy One. We owe it to Poland and the Church. Historical fact requires it of us.

Mr Bogdan

* * Oh, * *