I'm totally not curious in football, so I wasn't expected to talk about Martiniak. All practically the statements I encountered were shallow (it is incorrect to leave/bad platform/bad antifascism), so I decided to supplement my erstwhile observations with my conclusions.
Antifascism is not a illness of the strategy but a symptom of a illness that is the System. Anti-fascists be due to the fact that individual pays them for their activities, individual gives them jobs to denunt as “fascism” all manifestation of identity, individual appreciates their “research” in this area and grants them degrees of science.
The removal of the “anti-fascists”/lefts will so not solve anything, due to the fact that fresh ones will appear in the place of the deleted ones. They will appear due to the fact that they are part of the system's self-regulation mechanics and its strengthening. The strategy is so a problem, not its "defensive mechanisms".
The perfect essence of the strategy is ethical universalism, anthropological individualism, rationalism. Its mechanics is capitalism, which could have occurred thanks to the adoption of these philosophical ideas. Capitalism requires logic including: erstwhile a competitor competes against 1 another, a trader discriminating a category of customers or business partners and a non-discriminatory entrepreneur, the another will always win.
Thus, the strategy is not directed by any dark and mysterious “anti-fascist”/leftist/Jewish/globalist/Bilderberg, “bankers moving to Islam” to destruct “Latin civilization” (thesis by Dr. Krajski) or anyone else. These "interest groups" evidently benefit from the improvement of the strategy and support it, but even if they were eliminated, the strategy (capitalist globalisation) would not halt spinning (for this reason Hitler's prescriptions were simple and were based on superficial only a diagnosis of the problem – Hitler drew his cognition of the planet from any Viennese tabloids and his analytical abilities were weak).
The individual support of the strategy is not Illuminati, humanoid lizards or masons, only managers, entrepreneurs, bureaucrats, journalists – people like us who have no bad intentions, but who do what they do, just to have a job, to supply well-being to their loved ones, to accomplish acceptance and social respect, etc. According to classical liberal theory, it is the logic of the functioning of capitalism that makes their individual egoism-motivated private activities compose themselves into a global liberal System.
The same logic besides applies to government and non-governmental bureaucracy, and besides to global capital, whose opportunities have long exceeded the possibilities of policy financing by the population of a given country or the voters making donations. That is why all populist organization will lose to parties consisting of global capital: no contributions from voters or even the highest taxes in the "national state" will outweigh the tides of global speculative capital. Unless we are dealing with a "continental state" (US, EU, India, China, to any degree Russia, possibly Indonesia), which, especially if its inhabitants have adequate purchasing power, can counter speculative capital.
Capitalism so naturally rewards the abolition of any differentiation and valuation criteria. This should be explained by the seemingly paradoxical fact of the promotion of "vocism" by the large corporations and the backing of the leftist movements. erstwhile a company tries to build a marketplace position on a call to ethnos, it is crushed over time. This was the case, for example, with Abercrombie&Fitch, which initially ostentatically promoted the "wild white boys" by referring to the white U.S. population, but which has been swept over by the global market, kaja now equally ostentatiously and promotes liberal pathology.
Ethical and anthropological universalism was instilled in the planet by abrahamic religions, specifically by Christianity. Only in the West Christianity (Catholicism) took a rationalistic form, hence it was in the Catholic West and not among the Christians of the Levant, North Africa or East Africa that capitalism was born. For the same reason, capitalism was not born in India, Tawantinsuy, or in ancient Rome. All ideological components were needed: universalism, individualism, egalitarianism, rationalism, linear concept of time with the resulting thought of progress.
For this reason, the conservative opposition against the strategy will never be effective. Catholic and Protestant Conservatives share philosophical ideas that trigger the mechanics of capitalism. Catholic conservatism is so incapable to reject the System, due to the fact that confronted with philosophies within which capitalism could not be born, it will always reject it (as "oriental", "disposal", "barbaric" etc.).
However, religions have it in their minds that they value: they separate between “good” and “evil”, “faithful” and “unbelievers”, “truth” and “mistake”. Hence, they do not fit in the logic of the strategy (capitalism) and are gradually watered and extinguished by it. So I have bad news for all TFPs and another “controvolutionists”: there will never be any “good” capitalism-System about the Calvinist, greenish, Catholic, muslim or national face. The strategy will chew and digest you sooner or later. Until the last mosque opens another McDonald's, and in the last pilgrimage place they put a coca-cola vending machine.
No strategy right can prevent the march of “vocism” due to the fact that all populism (collective identity) stands in the way of the improvement of capitalism (i.e. expanding prosperity, providing peace, etc. – left-wing criticism of capitalism as leading to poorness is completely unconvincing, due to the fact that objectively this model of management is simply effective and works). Any organization or company that tries to trust on the economical resources of a peculiar country and people will lose to those that trust on global speculative capital – unless we are dealing with a "state-continent" of at least 140 million (rich) inhabitants.
Global capitalism is so able to tame only the "states-continents" (counting over 140 million inhabitants): the Yankee Empire (USA), the Chinese Empire, the Indian Empire, the European Empire (German), the Eurasian Empire (Russian – if Russia joins Ukraine), the muslim Empire (Turkish). Google's experience of clashing with the EU, China, Russia and any another countries described by Shoshana Zuboff illustrate that global speculative capital can be overcome erstwhile it is large enough. Global capitalism could so end the global "concert" of the powers-imperia-civilization.
The condition for worldview of the accomplishment of this state is to reject the doctrine of universalism-individualism-egalitarianism-rationalism-historism. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri compared the strategy years ago to the Roman Empire. Outside Roman limes there were barbarians (Scythians, Sarmatians, Huns, Mongols, etc.). They were peoples organized in tribes, patriarchal, militant. They cared not what was good at all, but what was good for them. They plundered Roman cities without sentiment and took over Roman technology, just as centuries later their successors in Mongolia acted with the Christian West.
The exclusion from the logic of the strategy (capitalism), present is the abandonment of ideas constituting Western civilization (universalism-individualism-egalitarianism-rationalism-historyism). So return to the thought of "tribalistic" (strain/camrack). uncovering oneself outside the strategy means “back to barbarism” – that should be the content of Polish Eurasianism. And the barbarian is individual whose civilized and enlightened Western man (a resident of the “global village”) hates, fears, disgusts. Barbarians swindle dogs and pursuit them through the woods to poke him out somewhere in the last cave of any Waziristan. Then you can bury it somewhere down the barn. At best, give him a "reserve".
The strategy towards barbarians is what communist Poland was to the anti-communist armed underground, what states were founded in the Americas by European conquerors to the indigenous inhabitants of these continents, what agricultural civilization was to the wolf. The exit from the strategy to barbarism (tribunal logic) is so a modern "wolf" – a werewolf was a man surviving in a settlement (Civilization) who abandoned her by fleeing to the forest (Nature) and then – generating hatred, fear and disgust of the light and civilized, waged a conflict against them, and being pursued by them. The natural symbol of the Antisystem (modern barbarism) is so a wolf – not accidentally, among others, in Christianity considered an symbol of anarchical evil.
In any case, "dissidents" from the strategy (wolfs) cannot anticipate any "justice" from the System. The strategy was constructed against us – we know that all universalism is false and hides only the structures of dominance, in this case the structure of dominance of our enemies. Police, courts, peculiar services, troops, “free media” – these are all chain dogs of the strategy (“Sheepdogs” from Dave Grossman’s perfect book “On Killing”), which are to fight barbarians, that is, us. Referring to ideological spells that legitimize these institutions makes no sense – we can trust only on ourselves and our comrades in the final account (and hence the barbarian/dissident from the strategy should constantly increase its potential, become more independent and “more dangerous”)
We should have a akin attitude to the institutions of the strategy (as to another "achievements of Western civilization") like barbarians to the cities and technology of ancient Rome or Mongolians to the countries they invaded – as advised by Mr Tarnowski: "take and not bloom", that is, scope for them purely instrumentally (Lenin "capitalists will sale us a string on which we will hang them").
Secondly, we must first cleanse the Western philosophical sludge (anthropocentrism-universism-individualism-rationalism-historism). We have obligations to each another and to our anti-system comrades – with whom we would like to make a (political) community of fate. It is their opinion that we should care about, it is their strengthening that is besides strengthening us. In justified cases, this can even be stamped in barbaric with private (non-systemic) rituals like blood brothers. The remainder of the "nation" or "international society" – whether it recognizes us as "fascists", "Russian agents", "traitors", "terrorists" or anything else – is irrelevant. Only our “strain” – apart from the ellipse of light falling from the fire (idea) around which we gather (i.e. people gather together), lives only demons, monsters, zombies, etc. As Clem Tholet erstwhile sang: “What it was a time – all the planet against us!”.
This world-view break-up with Western civilization (anthropocentism-universism-individualism-rationalism-history, the culmination of which is the present "vocism") is the foundation for breaking the logic of the System. The marketplace may even be "free" (and in any case competitive – in the end capitalism is more effective than the nonsense of social democrats or another deviations, specified as the "careful state/state of prosperity" which want to turn us not into a pack of wolves but in a mechanics connected to feeding pigs), so that it does not act in the logic of anthropococentism-individualism-historism. We accomplish adequate that my frat-commarcy will keep a functional balance and comparative advantage over others and will not start to break down (to break down, feminize, etc.). We leave the remainder in peace or scatter as a potter. There is no "progress", "humanity" or even "nations", so we whistle at people (?) with whom we have no bond, who have another crest-totem-genius.
Here we break the logic of the strategy not by the assembly more than could gather (geopolitics/imperia-continents), but as if "from within". This ‘neotribalistic counterrevolution’ (‘Camracian’) can be started as ‘from within’ of the System. Globalism will not be overturned by people in turbans moving around the Sahara with black flags or hunter-gatherers from the Northern Sentinel, but the inhabitants of the "global village" who "flee back into the forest" ("Der Waldgang" by Jünger") will become dissidents/wolves/barbarbarics/in the West – eurasians.
I do not hide that until late I was closer to the concept of "cover" the strategy by "imperia-continents". The reality, however, "gives me the face of death," due to the fact that specified a perspective, though not excluded, is not coming any closer.
For example, it is already known that – through Putin's inability and kunktatory – Russia will not join Ukraine. Without Ukraine, the "Russian empire" (?) will not scope the ceiling of 140 million people, i.e. it will not become a "state-continent", and only specified ones are crucial in the global game.
Turkey has been hampered in Syria and Libya, has suffered defeats in Tunisia (Enahda's departure), Sudan (Omar al-Bashir's overthrow), and, above all, Egypt – if Muhammad Mursi were to stay in Egypt, then the political government in the Muslim and Mediterranean planet would look completely different today.
The German empire of the European Union has been paralyzed by the interior weakness of Germany and the obstruction of the US utilizing its instruments states specified as England, Holland and Poland. In addition, the opposition forces in Germany itself seem incapable to disassemble ticks in which this country holds the forces of the System, and the ethnos itself German destroyed its passion.
The identity movement of the Yankees lit by Trump seems alternatively to expire, and in any case distract.
The full Indopacifix belt (India-Vietnam-Taiwan-South Korea-Japan) is intensively ‘voking’, internalising the anti-culture of the strategy under US pressure.
The consequence of China's rivalry with the US is uncertain. China, even if they did not just secession from the System, rather clearly and in the desired direction they would change it, their success would be our success, but the consequence of Beijing-Washington's rivalry is not foregone and Putin's organization in Ukraine made it hard for us to reap the benefits of China's growth, paradoxically strengthening Washington's dominance in Europe – i.e. strengthening the System.
So there is simply a secession from the strategy – the "dissident movement". Another "fire" of solar, patriarchal, and ceremonial culture of honour must be lit. As you know, the fire is simply a symbol of the Sun. Men have always gathered in circles around the campfire to cultivate Order, Life, Power symbolized by the Sun and Fire. Fire is also, of course, a symbol of demolition and this must besides be remembered – if we light adequate anti-system “fires”, then... we will incinerate the System.
And that is the only way to end the next “anti-fascist” crusades against even the most blurred manifestations of peculiar identities that disrupt the globalist capitalism-System project. The affirmative content of the Antisystem should be Solar Idealism.
Ronald Lasecki
