Although these 2 statements divided the distance over a week, the returning communism could prompt the president to proceed in the mode of the city to dismantle and remove the symbolic furniture from the palace erstwhile and for all, along with post-communism. The table survived in the palace respective decades and erstwhile presidents, only the historian, regardless of the fact that it was the icon of the Polish systemic transformation, saw the signs of post-communism in it. Zbigniew Janas (oppositionist), commenting on the action to bring the circular Table out of the Presidential Palace, said explicitly: “Nawrocks do it as communists did.” Even greater emotions struck Joanna Szczepkowska, who heard the president say it “some actress” during the tragedy of her celebrated saying. So this actor did not dress in words; “Listen, the residence of the presidential palace, if it had not been for the circular Table, today, man without honor, you could not dismantle it and no 1 would have known of you...”. The circular Table is to go to the Museum of past of Poland.
Perhaps this place will be more suitable for a valuable exhibit. However, I feel that is not the point of controversy. A table of specified unique and historical importance deserves a better treatment. From president Nawrocki, a historian (someone on Facebook wrote: A historian like...), we could anticipate another entourage around the raising of the table, at which large designers of our present day debated the future of Poland. president Nawrocki has the right to have his assessment of the government side of the circular Table, but the function of the president is not to diminish the meaning of this exhibit. The display of the dismantling of the table that the wise men demonstrated to us on tv was a scandal.
The battleground, the twisted portions of the table, any people lurking among the ruins of the elements and on this background a happy host. This is not a three-door closet that plays our bedroom, and you gotta evict the closet to your cousins. Ministers at the President's Chancellery, trained in "accompanying" the government, did not master and will not learn the art of courtesy and diplomacy to be applied in the scenarios of events of a dignified office. It was a large mistake to propose to president Nawrock that in a public speech he remind the guest (and this does not double) deficiency of gratitude for the assistance shown to Ukrainians by Poles. Giving a gift in the form of a book on the Volyn massacre is more than an afront. Diplomats talk privately about hard matters and do not necessarily give an opinion on how they treated the interlocutor. Unless, in this case, Karol Nawrocki wanted to personally, at the forum, inform Braun and Mentzen that it was “hard”.
The media festival of the head of state did not end in the pre-Christmas week on pictures from the visit of the Ukrainian president. Just before Christmas, president Karol Nawrocki felt it essential to inform the public about vetoing 3 laws, but forgot to add that these vetoes would origin respective billion will not be sent to the NFZ for medical aid for Poles. The president did not mean billions, but that Poles should have something to talk about at Christmas tables.
