For decades, the co-author of the "Left June" has amazed us with the actions that warrant the question of who he truly is and what he truly serves.
Jacek Kurski has his merits, the biggest of which is the movie "Night Change". However, they do not compensate for the harm that he has repeatedly done. And it's large damage, due to the fact that for reasons that I can't guess, it's been carried out many times to any of the highest positions in our country. And in these positions he could do volts the strangest and most destructive. He was given these positions despite the cynical leap from 1 political organization to another. Many of Jack Kurski's actions call for vengeance to Heaven, and it is not clear whether they are the consequence of individual phobias or more. These included e.g. information policy, implemented by Kurski Telewizja Polska. For almost 4 years the TVP led by him acted as if there was no office of president of the Council of Ministers in Poland. At that time, it was possible to get the impression that any Members were almost surviving in tv studios due to the fact that the cameras showed them constantly. Meanwhile, about the impenetrable activity of Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki from a Kursk-run tv called public or government (!!!) could not learn almost anything. Looking at this curiosity situation, the main news service of TV, from the name of the president called Kur – Vision, I followed the stopwatch in my hand. In this way, I determined that the figures of the Prime Minister of the then government were never given more time than six seconds. Given that many Members were given respective twelve times more airtime, it can be said that the antenna presence of the 4th individual in the country, the head of government (!!!) was almost literal – none. This gave emergence to the apparent question of the reasons why the head of government is eliminated from the media presence on government television. Whether this is just a consequence of Kursian phobia or the reasons are more serious. Both justified the return of the question: Who truly is Jacek Kurski? What is its purpose? The reasons for asking specified a question Kurski gave more. late – an highly absurd attack against Mateusz Morawiecki again. Taken at the worst minute possible, at the time of the largest in a twelve years poll declines of the Law and Justice parties, during the time of the top threat to the dissolution of this formation. Without a doubt, this Kurski step worked to permanently destruct the Law and Justice – among the parties who could number on any success in the upcoming elections. That is, to consolidate the Tusk regime, to extend its regulation to another term. So who is individual doing this?
Jacek Kurski frequently gives 2 questions. The first concerns his brother Jarosław, since 1989, who has been operating on the very tops of political and media elites highly opposed to those with whom Jacek Kurski is associated. They disagree in their small, 2 and a half years of age. Both of them are the only siblings, they grew up in the same house, they went to the same schools, they function in the same environments. Like twins, they were frequently confused. And from the very beginning of the systemic transformation – set on other sides of the barricade. And at their peaks – Jarosław has been the actual leader of Agora Group for many years, the actual editor-in-chief of “Gazeta Wyborcza” and Jacek plays a akin function on the other side of the political scene, in the years of the regulation of the Law and Justice – in his capacity as president of Polish tv he was the head of the most crucial media in the country. I have always been intrigued by this “set-up” of these brothers. Is it truly due to strict ideas? many volts and acts so for the right side of the political scene harmful that almost deadly, between fairy tales let to put the definition of Jack Kurski's motivation as an expression of any ideas or views. In this way no 1 truly serves any cause.
The second question, which always comes back to me, erstwhile Jacek Kurski at the worst moments possible, is asking severe blows to Poles, for whom the primary value is Polish independence, concerns the household roots of Jack Kurski. Of course, no 1 is liable for what kind of grandparents he had. Personally, I think that all hebrew deserved for Poland should be worshiped as a Polish national hero and each of them should be a memorial in all Polish city. And space and bronze for these monuments are enough, due to the fact that there were not so many. At times hard for Poland, unfortunately, they did not form the majority in their national circles. Hence the work to remember them falls on us, on cultural Poles, due to the fact that no 1 else will worship Berk Joselewicz or his soldiers. Or any like them. However, Jack Kurski's closest relatives were not people like Berk Joselewicz. Unfortunately, but in this case, behind the digest of 1 but highly vile figure, we had to do with differentness the most full of totals. The most utmost of extremes...
The darkest of black characters of Polish past without a shadow of a uncertainty is Davied Louis Bernstein – Namier. abroad names and names shouldn't confuse us. He was born in 1888 in an old noble court in Wola Okrzejska. In 1846 Henry Sienkiewicz was born. The household of the large Polish writers lost this property in the wake of anti-Polish repressions launched by the Carat after the suppression of the January Uprising. Property confiscated or (as in the case of property in Wola Okrzejska) under any pretext expropriated, became the property of a Russian state or Russian officers, thus rewarded for drowning in the blood the vigor of Polish freedom. Russian offices and fresh Russian owners of plundered property most frequently wanted to sale quickly. However, Poles adhered to the rule that what the possessor had robbed, they would not buy. However, the Jews were eager to get real estate, and they became tycoons in this area. This procedure had a colossal scale as it was supported by Kronenberg Bank and another judaic bankers. The debt for the acquisition of a tenement house, a palace, a manor house, a noble farm secured by mortgage on the property was, in fact, a minimum risk. The call “Your streets, our houses” directed at Poles dates back to that time. The property in Wola Okrzejska was then bought by the matrimony of Warsaw Jews – Józef Bernstein and Anna Sommerstein. The reason for this is that their attitude towards Poland and Poland was so affirmative and our national traditions so close to them that they began to live in Wola Okrzejska in the most Polish way. They besides changed their name and were known as Niemirovski since the 1880s. They had 2 children – Louis and Theodore. The boy of Louis (one of the darkest figures in Polish history) studied in Lviv, Lausanne and Oxford. Despite being raised in a home filled with Polish tradition by parents baptized in the Catholic Church – during his studies Louis decided to control to Judaism. shortly he besides began to show utmost hostility towards Poland, Poles and everything Polish. And this hostility, in moments for the decisive Polish fate, had the chance to translate into very painful blows. specified in the category of almost fatal blows, which are about “Polish to be or not to be”. In the run-up to the Versailles Conference, on which the future of the Polish state and its borders was to be weighed, it became the most crucial of the collaborators of the Prime Minister of large Britain – Davied Lloyd Georg. The boy of Bernstein – Namierowski was already named Davies – Louis and the names of Bernstein – Namier. For Prime Minister Lloyd George, a nouvre without real education, all minute compromising the ignorance of the most simple geography, confusing the names of cities with the names of generals Davies – Louist Bernstein – Namier was more than a walking encyclopedia and knowing the answer to all question an expert on everything. He was a guru, mentor, oracle. And the fact that he frequently cynically lied, the British Prime Minister in no way was he able to understand. The consequences – for Poland and Poles were terrible. And they would not lose the existence of Polish statehood in general. The beginning of the Versailles Conference was inactive very promising for Poland. The British were then represented by abroad Minister Arthur Balfaur. After first talks with him, Roman Dmowski, president of the Polish delegation, noted: “It’s great! The full western border of Poland is to run as before the partitions, our Gdańsk, Warmia and the essential part of Mazury – ours!” However, erstwhile Balfaur was replaced by Lloyd George with Namier Dmowski, he immediately had to telegraph to Ignacy Paderewski, who had left Paris for a fewer days: “Come back immediately! Poland is getting smaller all day!” extremist change in Polish matters was the consequence of actions by Namier, the most defamatory data on the historical affiliation and nationality of subsequent fragments of indigenously Polish lands. As a result, Poland was deprived of its rights to Gdańsk and from Wielkopolska the Pilska Land, Babimoj Land, Wschkowska Land, Wałecka Land... The Polish delegation did what it could, but the strength of the arguments of the representatives of the country only regaining independency was clearly weaker than the statements of the Prime Minister victorious in the large War of the British Empire. All the more so, due to the fact that Lloyd George, most likely besides thanks to the whispers of Namier, frequently returned to the statements that “at the time of this war Poles were shooting at us”, which was an allusion to the Legions of Józef Piłsudski and hundreds of thousands of Poles who were forced into the German and Austrian armies. erstwhile Namier managed to lead the Polish border on the German side leaving areas connected with Poland frequently continuously since the time of Mieszko I, together with hundreds of thousands of Poles surviving on them, the second act of Polish tragedy began. 1 where Poland was treated for all hell worse than the defeated Germans. It consisted of imposing the alleged number Treaty on Poland. 1 of its records afraid the authoritative languages of the reborn Poland, and it was that 2 another languages – Yiddish and Hebrew – remained equal to the Polish language. Assuming that all Polish authoritative would gotta know all these 3 languages, this would mean that virtually no Pole could become a Polish official. All Polish offices – would be in the hands of people not of Polish nationality. For this reason, despite countless protests, this rule in the Second Republic did not enter into force. For apparent reasons – the Polish state would not then be a Polish country.
After the Versailles Conference, Namier appeared many times in Polish history. Of course – always as a ghostly figure for us. 1 specified situation occurred in 1920, while the Bolsheviks were pushing for Warsaw and the UK proposed negotiations with aggressors. The condition was placed first of all by 1 – Poland's consent to the border moving in the areas of Przemyśl, Rzeszów and Lublin. Today, by the name of the British abroad Minister, this line is mainly known as the Curzon Line. At the time, it was called the "Namier Line – Curzona", due to the fact that it was Namier, an expert of the British abroad Office, who stood behind and behind the full concept of the most extremist truncation of Poland. As we all know – despite the highly tragic situation and by many perceived as hopeless – then Poland rejected the British offer. For a simple reason – Poland in the form invented by Namier did not have the least chance of existence.
As I mentioned earlier – Namier had 1 sister. She's a daughter. This daughter died in 2016. Before her death, for 2 terms, she was a senator of the legislature of the Republic of Poland. She had previously become the parent of 2 sons – Jarosław and Jack Kurski. From photographs very akin to them, Davies – Louis Bernstein – Namier, their grandmother's brother, could not know due to the fact that he died a fewer years before their birth.
I repeat that, of course, no 1 is liable for the actions of their relatives. And according to my deepest conviction, it has nothing to do with genetics. Nationality is simply a substance of strict cultural, identity – it is the consequence of individual choice. So I never blame anyone for having specified or another ancestors. However, erstwhile individual abruptly kicks my country, I'm just beginning to wonder – what this tendency is made of.
Artur Adamski
