He is bowed to by the most powerful institutions in the United States. With 1 exception. Thus "The Atlantic" exposed Donald Trump's "foolness"

news.5v.pl 3 months ago

"The Atlantic", hated by Trump and his allies magazine, posted the full conversation on Wednesday morning in a group chat between the highest officials of the administration on the military operation in Yemen. He did so after White home press secretary Karoline Leavitt told the magazine that he "opposed to publish". Thus, editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg and national safety reporter Shane Harris successfully opposed the administration, which mostly got utilized to getting what he wanted — and got the White home to make the next move.

"There is simply a clear public interest in revealing the kind of information that Trump advisers have contained in unsecured communication channels, especially since elder officials effort to underestimate the meaning of the news made available," journalists wrote.

‘There is only 1 consequence to this calibre error’

It was an different reprimand for Trump, who, from the day of the inauguration, embarked on a journey of revenge, tearing apart the national government, elite universities, information organizations and law firms he considered enemies. And she left the president not only incapable to usage his typical tools of power, but besides with limited options — and with the simplest way out, which is at the same time something he very much dislikes doing.

“There is only 1 consequence to the mistake of this calibre: you apologize, you take on and hold everything until you find out what went incorrect and how it never happened again,” said Connecticut typical Jim Himes, the highest ranking politician in the home Intelligence Committee on Wednesday during the hearing. ‘It did not. The Secretary of defence responded with a violent attack on a reporter who did not ask to join the group chat in the Signal communicator".

The allies besides called on the administration to ease the situation. "I think the crucial thing is that they made a mistake, they know it," said legislature majority leader John Thune on Wednesday. "They should admit it and fix it so that it never happens again."

EPA/WILL OLIVER / PAP

U.S. Vice president J.D. Vance during a speech at the National League of Cities Congressional City Conference in Washington, USA, 10 March 2025.

Consent with money

Supported by Government Efficiency Department Elona Muska Trump He decided to gut the national government.which he and his allies consider to be guided by the “deep state” .

One of the largest news networks in the country, ABC News, made a deal with Trump for $15 million. And another, CBS News, seems ready to settle for another million. The law firm Paul, Weiss — erstwhile a champion in the fight against the president during his first word of office, promised $40 million for pro bono legal services in cases supported by Trump.

Columbia University, an institution of the Ivy League older than the Republic itself, agreed to 9 unprecedented policy changes to launch talks that would unlock $400 million national funding.

But the case of The Atlantic turned out to be different.

Further string of material under video

Attack, attack, attack

When National safety Advisor Mike Waltz inadvertently added Goldberg to the Signal group chat with another top officials of the administration, including Vice president J.D. Vance, erstwhile discussing plans for the attack on Huti rebels, it was a serious suicide accident.

Against another enemies Trump mostly took a decisive approach, signing executive acts against them and withdrawing national funds. But these options do not be in this case, which forced Trump to adopt its basic strategy: “Attack, attack, attack”.

Goldberg is simply a “cannalia” whose reports are “bad for the country”, said Trump on Tuesday, defending Waltz and attacking the magazine “The Atlantic”, which he called “falling” (although he was profitable since March 2024). Steven Cheung, Trump's communications director, called the publication of Goldberg a “mystification” and the resulting outrage of “witch hunt”.

In his first article, Goldberg refused to print the chat message in its entirety, writing that “information contained in it, if read by an opponent of the United States, could be utilized to harm American military and intelligence personnel.” On Tuesday, however, Trump, White home officials, Waltz, and another chat crewers stressed that no part of it was secret — all of it only dared Goldberg to publish.

So he did it.

Trump’s ‘Stupid’

The President's administration continues to prosecute the same strategy, arguing that "war plans" were not made available at all. "The Atlantic acknowledged: these were NO “war plans”, said White home spokesperson on X.

“The Atlantic”, in a Wednesday article, calls it “the attack plans”, but it is not a concession. The chat news contained a agenda of military operations, more than 2 hours before the planned killing of the mission's main target.

“If this text had been received by individual hostile to American interests — or individual simply indiscreet and having access to social media — Huti would have time to prepare for what was to be a surprise attack on their fortresses,” Goldberg and Harris wrote. "Consequences for American pilots could have been catastrophic".

"It is clear that Goldberg overestimated what he had," said Vance on X. This incidental seems to be the only decision of the administration for now — Unless, of course, she chooses the head to beheaded. Investigations are likely to continue, and an mistake is specified an incendiary trigger that, even despite Trump's series of "extinguishing fire" messages, it seems likely to play a function in the 2026 and 2028 elections.

This is foolish,” said Trump’s supporter, referring to the White home strategy of claiming that “The Atlantic” is lying. Anonymously, to avoid vulnerability to officials of the President's administration.

Read Entire Article