We anticipate the fresh president to be the leader in the civilian War – not the peacemaker. As there is no agreement between “Christ and Belial”, so there cannot be a peaceful coexistence of Poles with people in an aggressive way negating moral and social principles resulting from natural and conventional Polish customs.
Karol Nawrocki is aware that he won thanks to the credit of trust from (most conservative) voters Grzegorz Braun and Sławomir Mentzen. On behalf of myself and, as I dare say, at least any of these 2 groups, I will specify what this credit means.
For many years he has been repenting in Poland with a naive, populist slogan, which Andrzej Duda besides repeated, declaring to be “the president of all Poles”. It would be rather logical and apparent if we lived in a planet where the common good is clearly defined. Yes, the head of state is the president of all Poles insofar as he cares about nonsubjective moral order and interior and external safety according to the Christian order of love.
We know that we do not live in specified a world, which is why having the president of “all Poles” is simply impossible. There are objectively good things in politics: protecting life from conception to natural death, defending borders from anyone who wants to enter the country illegally or making decisions for the economical improvement of Poles and not involving our country in any war. This category besides includes the act of mercy, which is to bury victims of genocide, even if this means a conflict with the barbarian state that blocks these burials. It is besides an nonsubjective good to take care of the good name of Poland and to explain historical lies (including a silk lie), even if it would offend the lobby connected with a tiny but influential state located in Palestine.
These are only the first fewer examples, but at this point it is clear that the President, who wishes to address these topics in the spirit of the common good, will be hated by the majority of those who voted for his "progressive" counter-candidate.
With Karol Nawrock, it is clear that the president declares himself Catholic. Under excommunication, he is so obliged not to contribute to any weakening of the legal standards yet protecting unborn lives – in another words, he cannot be the “president” of citizens who support compromises on killing children.
The question, however, is Mr president going to be a Catholic only privately or publicly?
There is no equality between fact and error
According to the logical belief traditionally preached by the Church, there is no and cannot be a sign of equality between fact and error, good and evil. Liberalism is so a mistake, and tolerance, understood as abolishing evil which cannot be removed, is not a "value" in itself or a policy objective. Being Catholics and Conservatives (i.e. people who admit an nonsubjective natural order and universal natural law along with natural justice independent of the laws of law) we are not obliged to “dialogue” with evil. We're expected to fight him.
While observing the anger with which part of the Polish people are against God's law, we have no uncertainty that this is no longer a dispute over whether to give more or little benefits or whether the state should build apartments or not. This is simply a civilised dispute, in which on the 1 hand we are—recognising the common root of the identity of Poles, Catholics and all who, even if from different perspectives and with different consequences, nevertheless recognise the conventional order of the world—and on the another hand the complex and blinded followers who are willing to bury alive what is left of our homeland, in order to gain praise from the "enlightened" elites of the European Union.
For years, we have besides been told that liberal left-wing "elites" have been acting in the name of universal "human rights" and "standards of democracy", which is why they can manifest their superiority and, as they consider appropriate, hotel to law violations and force (although attacks on defenders of life and churches).
It's precisely the opposite. It is us – with all the humility we should keep – that stand on the side of universal order and we have the right to apply all moral means (including violence) if this order needs to be defended. And erstwhile the legal strategy is armed against the common good and justice (as in the case of letting immigrants in and fighting civilian patrols), it is clear that a well-formed conscience should prompt us to wisely disobey the authority that applies specified measures.
The measurement of good and bad in the management of the state is not any democratic standard, but the natural law, which has gained its most clear expression in the Decalogue. If we add to this the fact that most Poles inactive declare their membership of Catholicism, then we have a clear set of prerogatives for Karol Nawrocki as the fresh president.
Having given the winner of the vote of trust, we do not have any illusions that the III strategy of the Republic of Poland will be changed (metatistic, built on erroneous philosophical and ethical foundations). However, we have the right to require strenuous efforts to "move accents", which is simply a tool for telling the fact and naming things by name.
We request to call “abortion” murder, while insulting God and the symbols of our religion – blasphemy, not any mythical, closer to an indefinite “image of spiritual feelings”. We require condemnation for all acts of empathizing with perverts and sex disorders and a clear message that they are incorrect due to the fact that they constitute a violation of public morality, not due to the fact that voters of Karol Nawrocki respect them as wrong.
Nor do we anticipate Karol Nawrocki to bring our country closer to the paradigm of individual work and economical freedom, due to the fact that he clearly declared that he was in the close position of the socialist views of the Law and Justice. We accept this amendment, but we require in absolute terms that at least what as a candidate has been declared by signing the alleged Toruń Declaration.
Finally, we require that the fresh president, without any hesitation typical of "professional" politicians, will be on the right side of the war of civilization with barbarism, which continues in our country.
The most crucial problem and the top weakness on our side is the deficiency of cognition of the rules and, consequently, the deficiency of knowing that we are the ones who stand on the ground of right which is not subject to discussion or vote. We hope that president Karol Nawrocki, despite his many duties, will find time to deepen his cognition of the conventional social teaching of the Church, and will draw from this origin the strength and wisdom to conduct Poland (and the organization he is associated with) to a fresh phase – in which there is no longer adequate "God-fathered" populism to call himself a Catholic and patriotic politician.
It would be highly useful if the president would like to consult, in particular, the clear explanation in the encyclicals Immortale Dei Leona XIII and Quas primas Pius XI, which we celebrate this year's century.
Filip Obara
Obara: We got it! But we're inactive 1.78 steps above the abyss...
