It is increasingly possible to get the impression that any judaic elites have completely lost contact with reality. Under the cloak of the fight against discrimination, it is attempted to impose on the goy societies its own ideological urges, demanding peculiar treatment and moral immunity for Jews from all criticism. Any opposition to the political influence of Talmudic environments is immediately presented as a manifestation of hatred, leading to an absurd situation where average public debate becomes virtually impossible.
"Europe must become more Jewish" – announced in full seriousness president of Axel Springer, Mathias Döpfner, during the planet judaic legislature (WJC). According to him, European states should even introduce preferential conditions for the migration of Jews, as it would be an "investment" in "creativity", "social stability" and "values" of Gojów countries.
This sounds like another manifesto on tolerance, diversity and openness. However, the problem arises erstwhile the slogans about equality begin to cover the demands of privileges for a peculiar cultural and spiritual group, together with censorship of criticism and opposition. The judaic communities – especially those in the West – have been making the same mistake for hundreds of years: they have been trying to impose on society a communicative in which all criticism of their influences, political actions or lobbying is automatically thrown into a bag with the word “anti-Semitism”. Then they wonder that there are real spontaneous explosions of anger towards them.
Effects for today? More and more people are beginning to respond allergicly to all Jews, the insolence of their elites and organizations who effort to morally blackmail full societies. erstwhile the average European hears that his country is to be “more Jewish” that he should accept peculiar migration privileges for 1 group, and at the same time all effort to discuss ends with a hatred charge — it is hard to wonder that frustration and even a desire to retaliate is born.
In this way we come to a circumstantial paradox: the more aggressive the Talmudic environments fight against “anti-Semitism”, the more they themselves contribute to the increase of social resentment towards themselves. average people do not like to be taught by privileged media, financial, or political elites, which simultaneously present themselves as eternal sacrifices, especially erstwhile they do so from a position of moral superiority.
The fierce Zionist Mathias Döpfner is not a random figure here. For years, he has declared himself a ‘non-Jewish Zionist’ and has consistently supported the pro-Israeli media line. In his speech he besides spoke of "zero tolerance" towards "anti-Semitism", criticized academics and the media, and even stated that "anti-Zionism is racism". In another words: criticism of the State of Israel or Zionist ideology is to be treated as a moral offense. This is simply a very convenient plan — especially for those who want to close the debate before it begins.
Moreover, specified slogans perfectly apply to the demands made by the Jews in 2018 at the convention of their European legislature in Vienna. This case can be read about Here.
The most ironic is that the same environments, which constantly call for a "fight against prejudice", behave increasingly in a socially irritated way. After all, it is hard to anticipate enthusiasm in a situation where 1 group publically demands peculiar treatment, greater influence and additional political guarantees, while presenting itself as the world's most threatened minority.
In fact, any judaic elites may have lost contact with reality completely, or had grown into feathers so much that, feeling complete impunity, they began to throw masks off their faces. Europe is presently facing a migration crisis, economical problems, social tensions and a increasing sense of failure of national identity. A Zionist billionaire enters specified a social ground and tells Europeans that the solution is more Zionism and “more judaic Europe”. Well, possibly the average resident of Berlin, Paris or Brussels was looking forward to it.
OUR COMMENTS: If any another cultural group began to publically proclaim akin demands about "greater presence" of their own culture and peculiar migration preferences, the media would immediately rise an alarm about nationalism and fascism. In this case, however, we are to hear about "progress", "pluralism" and "democratic values", for it is only the righteous Jews.
Finally, the same people will be amazed to see an increase in social tensions and ask: “Where does anti-Semitism come from?” The answer can be brutally simple — its generator is simply a judaic shoe and a hucpa, a double standard, and a pushy pushing of your own interests under the cloak of a tolerance struggle.
We besides recommend: Appeal to Our Readers
