The ambassador's decision is simply a consequence to the Black man's declaration that he will not support the American and Israeli parliamentarians' initiative to support Donald Trump's candidacy for the Nobel Peace Prize. Czarzasty stated that he felt that "this does not deserve support". He added that Trump destabilizes the situation in global organizations, representing force and transaction policy (...). It's breaking rules, values, frequently global laws.
Reactions in Poland are as violent as the ambassador's entry. Prime Minister Donald Tusk sharply reposted on X: – Mr. Ambassador Rose, allies should respect each other, not teach each other. At least that's how we realize partnership in Poland. The situation was, of course, commented by opposition politicians. Przemysław Czarnek With the PiS in Radio Three, he powerfully attacked the Black One:
– Through his foolishness, Czarzasty put Poland in utmost danger (...). We will appeal to the majority of the Sejm to make a change in this position. He's not a marshal. – he said, accusing the politician of the Left that his “anti-Americanism” provoked the crisis and lowered the state's rank. Czarzasty himself – in consequence to the ambassador's sharp reaction – assured that he inactive respects the United States as a key partner of Poland, but will not change his opinion on fundamental issues that he believes concern principles and values alternatively than emotional politics.
Many commentators in the United States, including American media, criticise Ambassador Rose's actions. David Frum, the writer of the magazine "The Atlantic", even stated that – Chat GPT would establish better relations with Poland than the current Ambassadorand a erstwhile Republican congressman Adam Kinzinger judged Rose as a diplomat, whom It is simply a work to build bridges, not to set them on fire. Against the background of these political pushes, the question is: Should Poland submit to the American communicative around Donald Trump – especially in the context of his global aspirations – or should it hold its sovereignty in the assessment and criticism of planet leaders?
Professor Roman Kuźniar, a erstwhile advisor to the president for global affairs, stated in an interview with “Gazeta Wyborcza” that “this is not classical diplomacy, it is simply a demonstration of strength and emotion”. In his opinion, "ambassador is not from punishing constitutional authorities of the state, but from maintaining channels of communication even erstwhile relations are difficult". Kuźniar besides added that the public announcement of breaking up contacts "reminiscent of a more political influencer kind than a professional diplomat".
He says the same thing. Dr. Agnieszka Bryc from Nicolaus Copernicus University, US and NATO expert. On TVN24 she pointed out that "this is the first case after 1989 erstwhile the US Ambassador to Poland allows himself specified a individual and confrontational language towards 1 of the leaders of the Polish state". In her opinion, the problem is not the critic Donald Trump herself, but the “recognition that criticism of American politics automatically interferes with alliance relations”. As she stressed, "this is simply a very dangerous precedent".
Foreign experts talk in a akin tone. American Politologist Ian Bremmer He wrote on page X that "ambassadors should cool emotions alternatively than heat them", and the situation in Warsaw "shows how much the US interior policy is beginning to deform relations with allies". On the another hand, the abroad Policy noted in a short editorial comment that Rose’s reaction "is in line with a broader trend in the personalisation of diplomacy, in which loyalty to 1 policy becomes more crucial than the interest of the state".
In Poland, opinion-making media responses are equally clear. The “Rzeczpospolita” wrote about the “diplomatic wedge without an exit”, indicating that the talker of the Sejm – even if controversial – remains a constitutional typical of the legislative authority. "Politics" noted that Rose "did not strike Black as the leader of the Left but as the talker of the Sejm", meaning that the conflict was raised to organization rank. In turn, the weekly “Newsweek Poland” described the full situation as “an insulting diplomacy”, in which the emotions of 1 political camp in the US dictate speech to global relations.
