Why do reasonable people not realize bank money?

After 3 texts about financial money, the cretaceous and billies of gold, which are not in a single seIf, any inactive do not conceive and have doubts. These notes are:

• Part 1: https://naszeblogi.pl/75274-Money-with-air-and-trade-sometimes
• Part 2: https://naszeblogi.pl/75354-creation-currency-with-air-of-nothing-ex-nihilo
• Part 3: https://naszeblogi.pl/75366-mystery-poltor-bilion-golden-who-no-no-in-no-seiff

It is not always the essence of bad religion or ignorance. These vets are not caught by people who know the real, the efficient and the banal. So there is inactive resistance: it does not happen, something is incorrect here, but the bank cannot quit what it did not get. So I gotta compose the 4th part. Here is the reason for explaining why the correct reasoning of the people is frequently confused in the money of the banal. The problem is not in the knowledge-gathering, but in the non-difference of the 3 strands of this wave of valuate creation from the air.

Three orders of 1 vow!

The co-funded money has been operated in 3 order: legal, bilateral and operational. Each of them is consistent. Each individual may be correctly assessed. At any rate, they are easy caught.

The legal board gives an opinion on the environment. Contracts, periods, claims, sanctions. It is clear that the bank has the right to put money and money in its hands. It is the language of the Cywilne Kodek and Ban­koweg Prawa.

The bi-lanson board will give a quote. Act and balance. Neutrality of single coverage. Whether or not the bi­lans are entrenched. It's a language of urgency.

The Board of Directors gives an opinion on the operation of the system: whether the client can pay with a card, whether the transfer is made or not, the product has become successful. It is the language of everyday experience.

The technological mistake is that we explain the uniqueness of the system, 3 times having 1 order at a time, and the remaining ones are considered invalid or derived.

Why is it not enough?

Frequent arg­g­ings: the bank cannot return something that it had not previously borrowed. Therefore, the originals are talking about the return of money, they had to enter the ban before.

It is possible to keep a right back erstwhile the money flows as much as possible. Like a coat in a robe. That's why banjos don't exist, back of the earth.

The bank does not gotta usage the bank to attract money to the bank. They must only have a legal basis to establish the association. This is the basis for the creation, and it is possible for it to re-establish the means of distribution, which are bilanson.

The Bank is expected to do so. I don't think there's money in the round. It's not just yet.

Cash is inactive available for the ban­ku of the back of the fuel to service the claim, not the origin of the money. The Banca have a cash-in-the-gospoke combination of wafers in the gospoke – and that is enough, due to the fact that the majority of claims accounted for 1 with no cash. A large number of major circulations would number on the amounts of money spent than the banks.

If all people wanted to pay what they had on the accounts, the bans would not have the same cash in the seismic areas. In practice, the amount of cash that is inactive a fewer times little than the amount that is paid in the accounts. This does not mean that the bans are non-liquid. Theoretically, it would be possible to get out of this situation, announcing: “Pay back all your creeds.” In this way, the money created would disappear, and it would be the only cash that would be adequate for any.

Why is it not adequate to be able to help?

The second part of the argument of the bronzes: a single formation creates a bilanso-neutral. The subject is increasing by the ownership of the CD, the bond is increasing by the deposit. There's nothing going on. This is the fact – at the level of 1 ban and 1 charge. 1 of these features does not mean that money will not emergence in the full system. Neutrality does not indicate macro negativity. If that were the case, the sum of deposits would not grow with the capital injection. And it's growing.

The study will give an opinion. It does not measure the effects of the agreement. It is as if the single non-Internet transistor does not exist.

Critic point: the key to the mouse!

There is no connection between a single mechanism: they are waiting for a bank to re-assemble its own capital, and they have a balance that can be paid. It's not about getting a deal. This is the right thing to do. It's about the ability to finish an animal.

In this moment, there is no physical impact of the cash from the another client, the transfer of the funds from the Sejm to the local government. There will be bilanson writing, which will besides include the creation of a Creed and Deposition for Demand. Since then, she has been able to call for a fresh transaction. The client is buying goods. The transferor will receive payment. The visitor works. This is an observational fact, an empirical fact, different from the earlier fact of the book.

Why are we being betrayed?

Human intuition is the end of the world. Something has to come in, something has to come out. There must be something in the sejpa that could be given. It's just that it's inactive. Worked in the planet of the earth. In a planet where payments are promised to become a means of payment, the bank is left behind. This is not cheating. This is not just a magazine. It's an architec­ture of the system.

Why are reasonable people wrong?

They do not think that they do not know quails, not that they do not realize the accounts. They think that they are utilizing a unique language. They see a tree, they don't see a forest.

The work is in order. Rachun­cation is in its own right. Despite this, the banjos are formed in the minute of the creation – a evidence that becomes a genuine purchasing power. I'm gonna get up from nothing, except.

If individual after 3 weeks inactive has doubts, it is not due to the fact that they did not read. Only for the sake that it did not cease to think of money in a clear way about money and food. And that's the actual bare of the common banality.

The value can be anything, including trust.

Non-physical gold is currency. It's not the back of the tree. Also, it will be written on the Bancon, the lava, the earth, or the cryptograficial tones.

Already in the old days erstwhile the banks were emerging, the valuate was separated from the matter. The owner of the treasury was emitting much more gold than he actually had gold in the treasury. In fact, it was able to sale all the gold and not have it all – and trade would proceed to work.

The game was not gold, but trust. Until the emissions were moderate, the value was not gold, but the value of gold in the treasury was pure virtual.

When he oversaw the number of receipts issued, inflation, anger, bloc and the abrupt discovery that there was nothing in the treasury — the religion collapsed, the currency collapsed. It was not the substance of deciding on the value of the weight, but the abuse of confidence. To this day.

Grzegorz GPS Swiderski
]]>https://Twitter.com/gps65]]>
]]>https://t.me/CanalBlogeraGPS]]>
]]>https://www.youtube.com/@GPSIFriends]]>

Tags: gps65, economy, politics, currency fiat, banking system, central bank, finance.