In the opinion of the newspaper, so far, the “great moment” of relations between politicians was the first gathering to take place on August 14, After which Tusk stated that they had managed to scope agreement on 1 thing that “we have loved families and fantastic children”.
As reported by ‘FT’, Nawrocks rapidly vetoed government laws just after taking over the presidency, including the 1 concerning exile benefits from Ukraine. ‘He besides challenged Tusk about who should guide abroad policy and be a partner for talks with Donald Trump," writes the journal.
“Game of Power”
Prof. Monika Sus of the Polish Academy of Sciences said in a conversation with “FT” that politicians should share their work, where “Tusk would deal with European partners and Nawrock with the American administration.” In the opinion of a polytolist, Instead, Poland continues to "play for power". The current situation concerns the interviewer "FT", especially as regards Polish abroad policy, including Ukraine.
Further string of article under video material
The diary noted that “Nawrocks, 42-year-old historian and now politician, exploits increasing anti-immigrant sentiments and exile fatigue to mark its presence among right-wing opposition in Poland, in which the aging leader of PiS, Jarosław Kaczyński, has long dominated".
"A large Problem" Donald Tuska
In an interview with the paper Prof. Agnieszka Kasińska-Metryka from Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, she assessed that Nawrocki, being a political novice, has "great aspirations and wants to be president by 2 terms". According to a polytholist, “Tusk has a large problem due to the fact that his support is falling, promises stay unfulfilled, and Nawrocki blocks all bill."
The article “FT” states that “the tensions between Tuski and Nawrocki are besides tightening on the question of the budget for 2026, because the government is fighting to keep evidence defence spending without violating EU fiscal rules." At the same time, the president's announcement to veto a bill that would increase taxes on alcohol and sugar was quoted. According to the British newspaper, this is an example “exerting force on Tusk to make further cuts in expenses or utilized funds elsewhere.’
"Although Tusk has a majority in parliament, and the president cannot veto the budget, Nawrocki could mention him to the Constitutional Court in which the judges of the Law and Justices sit," speculates the journal. He recalls prof. Kasińska-Metryka's comment that "Nawrocki's goal is to destruct this government"and not accepting the budget will make this nonsubjective more realistic."
