In the erstwhile Text Wall I mentioned that the utmost right began to adjust slow to changing realities. It seems to me that this is the right time to remind how 1 of the far-right organizations (National Revival of Poland) tried to bend the right to its will and initially succeeded this organization. This is about the 2011 situation, erstwhile the NOP wanted to subpoena the symbols of the organization. And there wouldn't be anything incorrect with it if it wasn't for the choice of these symbols. 1 of them was a ban on fulling, and the another 1 (notice, here you will request capslock) CELTIC CUT. This is simply a word of explanation, not about the alleged advanced Cross from the British Isles, but about the clearly defined symbol that neo-Nazi organizations around the planet use.
Time for a second word of explanation: approving these symbols would mean that the NOP could study to the prosecutor's office "trying to insult" these symbols. So if individual e.g. published a crossed-out celtic, then NOP could study to the D.A. an insult to the symbol of the organization and most likely the full case would end in court (or alternatively cases, due to the fact that this kind of situation would most likely be from hell). It would seem that in a country so experienced by Austrian watercolorists no 1 in their right head would registry a Celtic, right? Just like the another symbol, due to the fact that it's just vulgar and offensive.
So of course the registry court allowed these symbols. And no, it wasn't an oversight and a mistake. The court based its decision on an expert report, which was performed by 2 types from Lublin. Types explained that the Celtic had nothing to do with Nazism, due to the fact that (notice, remove fluids): “The metrics of this sign dates back to the times of the Celts and Slavs, and even the Indo-European peoples, erstwhile for these tribes the sign of the ellipse with the equilateral cross symbolized the sun, and later specified a form of cross besides gained acceptance of the Church. According to them today, the Celtic Cross is for most people an association with fantasy literature and Stonehenge, not neofascism.” (I mostly urge the full article that I will throw into the sources, due to the fact that there these excuses from justification are simply tragic). Then there was the cancellation of the RPO (the prosecution besides got involved). The court of the next instance was to analyse this and the case besides touched on the Constitutional Court. Finally, it turned out that since the NOP already has 1 symbol (falanga), it is impossible to registry another symbol and the compatibility of these symbols with RIGCze has not been studied. The NOP manager announced that the decision would be contested, but, as far as I know, it didn't work out. Thus, if individual erstwhile wondered what the utmost right would do if the law were on her side, then although the answer to that question is complex, an effort to registry a neo-Nazi symbol (and it is known what prohibition) could be part of the answer.
Since chronology is rather crucial in specified a wall of text, I will let myself to jump from the subject of nationalists to the subject of kibola. The fact that the public's attitude to kibola (understanded as people who like to wash themselves in the mouth due to the fact that the second has a scarf of another team) has changed, may be evidence of who won the 2025 presidential election. If individual in 2010 said loudly that in 15 years' time a man would become president, coming from a Kibolian community that was active in the setup, that individual would be ridiculed.
And at this point, I think it is worth asking the question "how the fuck did we get here?". I believe that the key to uncovering answers to this question will be 2011. It was then that Jarosław Kaczyński's organization clearly sided with the kibbola. And I realize that this was, among another things, the origin of the alleged "action fork" (2008). This action was about the police stopping from the cholera people (including passers-bys) as part of the fight against kibols. And as is the case with our country, first we ignore any problem for years (on this subject we are inactive getting a bit out of shape) and we are not trying to fight the causes of any phenomenon, and then there is simply a giant overkill that we do to show that “we are doing something”. In the course of this action, police forced evidence during interrogation. Tl;dr ended in damages/etc.
No 1 who remembers those times and how they behaved kiboles (the demolition of stadiums, the beating of passers-bys, the demolition of trains, the throwing of bricks and tabloids on buses/etc./etc.) was amazed that absolutely no 1 cared that the police then overstepped. We would like to say "sorry, this is the climate."
Because PiS in 2011 was looking for any way to grow the electorate (which should not be surprising, due to the fact that election defeat in 2007 was very severe) and fell on kibola. While simply paying attention to the fact that the police in 2008 crossed over, it was nothing wrong, it was already portraying all the kibols as police victims, it was an exaggeration and a harsh one. Hanging out with the kibols in 2011 did nothing to PiS, due to the fact that the failure in the parliamentary election was besides severe.
The Jarosław Kaczyński organization had a choice at the time: either we are dropping the subject or we are following the blow. Of course, the PiS went after it. Incidentally, it is unusual to think that no 1 yet in search of evidence of the political genius Jarosław Kaczyński did not dig into this year 2011 and did not begin to explain that Kaczyński played 5D chess due to the fact that he already planned in 2011 who he would exhibit in the 2025 presidential election. We will never know why Jarosław Kaczyński made specified a decision in 2011, not another decision, but after he made it, the full PiSowski agitprop started with the action to warm the image of kibola. It seems to me that the highest accomplishment was to compare kibola to the Home Army (unfortunately, I am incapable to origin it, due to the fact that it appeared in 1 of the quarterly numbers of "Frond" [the author was individual from the alleged hipster rightist whose representatives were, among others, Samuel Pereira and David Wildstein], and the screenshots were lost along with the contents of the old lapel). We were persuaded to do so (e.g. with the keyboard and mouth of Wojciech Wybórowski) that the kiboles have just the incorrect press and that actually they are cool fellows. Looking at these actions in retrospect, we must admit that they have been a spectacular success.
I am the Polish right hand and its actions have been observed for a long time and I am aware that there has been an almost perfect intellectual vacuum on the right hand for any time. Although there are quite a few people with technological titles there, there are individuals like Krasnodębski, Legatka or Zybertowicz. I don't want to be misunderstood. I don't want to take distant these people's titles. All I'm saying is that even those with these titles have thought one-track for so long, that they might as well not have, due to the fact that they are no different from the average PiSian agitation account on Eloneks.
With the right is besides the problem that its representatives (although they themselves claim otherwise) practically never think about what the effects of their actions might be. I mean, possibly not. They perceive their actions through the prism of whether they will let them to gain power (it is simply a very appropriate word here). If they come to the conclusion that this will happen, they will do something and do not wonder if the action will have any another effects.
This is precisely what happened erstwhile the image of the kiboli was warmed. The only thought in the Scriptures was that it was an electorate that was worth leaning for. There was no question about the long-term effects of specified activities. Well, it is. erstwhile individual was left kibolem in the '90s, there was no pretending that this full thing was about more than beating the crap out of another kibols and the police. These people were well aware that to a vast part of society they were common thugs. To put it a small differently: they knew that their behaviour was not socially acceptable, resulting in a rather large group of kibols increasing out of radicalization.
Now imagine that individual who is kept in the belief that individual does not like the kiboli, but due to the fact that he is simply a leftist or communist, a traitor (can be utilized together and interchangeably) and so on, and so on. Kibole are portrayed as heroes who will defend Poland from various threats (genders, elgiebets, wellness education, white people, lefts, European Union, Green Deal, Ukrainians, etc., etc.). I am not a psychologist, and I have the thought of development, but I dare say that it is hard to grow from something like this. What's different is that somewhere in the back of your head is that you're dealing with a bandit, and what's different is that you've been infatuated for years, that you're a hero. Oh, right, and I forgot the most crucial thing. Kibole both then and now continued to believe that force is simply a natural way of resolving conflict situations (anything).
Although we have not yet reached the point where most of the society considers the kibboli to be heroes, we are already at a phase in which a large part of the kibboli society was not disturbed by Karol Nawrocki's past. The same part of society begins to treat kiboli as “necessary evil”, due to the fact that they may be raining down the murder, but at least they will defend us from another threats. The fact that kibolism is practically inextricably linked to a gangster has been effectively driven out of “collective consciousness”. First we were shocked, then the news about the next kibole-gangus was the norm. And now no 1 cares.
During the presidential campaign, I was amazed to see how many affirmative reactions 1 kibol had accumulated. Well, erstwhile it became clear that Karol Nawrocki was active in the setup, a propaganda device was launched, which managed to convince a adequate part of the public that the setup was an honorary activity. 1 of the components of this device was “certificates”. Well, the manager of 1 of the large Chuligan pejs (no, I don't origin it for principle) argued that there is nothing incorrect with a past like Nawrocki. And besides, he came from a mediocre and violent family, became a kibol and then pulled him out of it (werble) Krzysztof Bosak, who educated him and him similar. It is unusual that Krzysztof Bosak did not commend himself for doing streetwork.
If it were actual that the superintendent came out of violent environments, he could only be applauded, but I dare to uncertainty it even due to the fact that he's leading a hooligan pej. Secondly, I realize that violent environments are easier erstwhile there is violence, alcohol and mostly conditions that are not conducive to appropriate development. Nevertheless, I will not let myself believe that going into a hooligan is the only way out of this situation. And I won't let you tell me that due to the fact that I grew up in the mediate of nowhere, I knew a full bunch of kibbolas and these people came from very different homes (they were not just representatives of the “people class”, although the editor of Woś would like to convince us all). Besides, I'm not a moron, the activities of Krzysztof Bosak I know very well and the thought that the erstwhile president (note will be CAPS again) YOUTH WSZEPOLSKIA is expected to be dealing with getting young people out of violent environments to prevent radicalization as absurd as that Ziemkiewicz can do research.
I sat over this peculiar wall of the text for a long time (of course it's about writing itself, due to the fact that the most long note of fantasy was in limbo), but at that minute I had to take a long break to think about the "which way to go now". The closer we are to “present times”, the more threads that would be worth moving, due to the fact that they affect the reality around us. On the 1 hand, we would like to describe it chronologically – on the other, sometimes it is essential to large Jump Forward (I'm sorry, I had to). And at this very minute behind the large Water there was most likely an event that would most likely pass without any echo, if not for the fact that the Polish right hand brought itself to the function of vulnerability of the MAGA movement. It's about, of course, Charlie Kirk's death.
Had it not been for the context, it would have been comic that the Polish right (nationals in particular) began to despair about the fact that in this US, it is already so bad that political killings occur. And that would be comic due to the fact that political-motivated force (including killings) occurs alternatively frequently there, and erstwhile a typical of the utmost right a fewer months ago killed a politician of the Democratic organization and her husband (and seriously injured the senator of the same party), and in the car he had a list of 70 people (you will not guess which organization they were from), someway nobody wanted to celebrate the victims with a minute of silence. Well, it's a digression.
In Charlie Kirk's case, the right was experiencing a real emotional rollercoaster, due to the fact that first the blame for the evil of the planet all was thrown on the left. Then, erstwhile it turned out that the perpetrator was a white citizen of Utah (although the politician of that state prayed that it would not be so), the substance became problematic. Well, then it turned out that since the perpetrator was in a relation with a transgender person, everything was fine (in a communicative dimension), due to the fact that the right hand could again delegate the perpetrator to the "left" category. The fact that this case was much more complex, and Robinson was neither left nor right, we talked as part of a podcast with Piotr Wilkin (link to the episode in the Sources you will find), so I will skip describing it due to the fact that it would require a separate wall of text.
For us, the key was the minute erstwhile the right started to rotation narrationally (because the perpetrator was white/etc.) and she tried to someway get out of the corner, to which she went. And again, with aid comes the invaluable Krzysztof Bosak, who wrote then on his Eloneks: "If that's true, it requires learning. Left-wing radicalism can be dangerous and push young people from good homes to break law and even crime. This is happening in the USA, in Europe, seldom due to the fact that it is rare, but besides in Poland.". I am most entertained by these youths. ‘from good homes’. due to the fact that you know, if the unsub wasn't white or his parents were left-wing, it'd be obvious, and yes, you gotta wonder how the left-wing radicalism of the mediocre man got it. It is known that if there was an act of violence, it must have been left-wing radicalism, due to the fact that right-wing radicals have never done any violence.
The entry was much longer and Bosak besides complained about it, and indeed, about the antifa, which says that he fights fascism, but chooses himself who is simply a fascist (Ziemkiewicz most likely breaks his pride that after 30 years individual repeats his narratives). On the another hand, they put 2 pieces of me on the shoulder. First one: "The existence of utmost right-wing extremism is not a reason to overlook its left-wing counterpart." So why don't we let Bosak, I don't know, start fighting the right-wing one? due to the fact that someway he is mostly liable for him, and for years he did not disturb him (in a minute I will bring “paragons”). And now the second passage: "Extremism begins where appreciation for political-motivated violence, justifying it, fascination with it, instructing it. All these elements are in the alleged ANTIFA movement.’
Man, I never expected to gotta compose that Krzysztof Bosak and his surroundings are part of ANTIFY. due to the fact that he and his environment are blowing off all the listed points. Take specified an example of arson of a rainbow from the Savior's Square (yes, it was an act of violence) in 2013. Immediately after this happened, Krzysztof Bosak was questioned by 1 writer for the event. Below I will post the stenogram of the occurrence (unfortunately, the origin link to the YT channel ends with the message "This video is private"):
Journalist: Mr. Christopher, how would you describe those who set the rainbow on fire in the Savior's Square?
Krzysztof Bosak: Presumably arsonists.
Bandits?
KB: This word would be justified if we agreed that arson of the rainbow was a criminal act. But as far as I know, this rainbow was expected to be dismantled a long time ago, and it shouldn't be there anymore. This was a time installation which, for unknown reasons - I fishy ideological inspiration - was extended to an unprecise time(...)
D: So not bandits?
KB: I wouldn't usage that word.
So you understand. The rainbow stood there (according to Bosak) illegally, so the arsonists were not bandits. In another words, we check “justification of violence”. Now we can decision on to the combined “recognition and fascination for violence”. After the rainbow was set on fire, 1 photographer would take a image of a burning rainbow, against which was a fellow with a white-red flag. This photograph was placed on the cover of the magazine “Poland Independent”. Why am I mentioning this? The fact that in early January 2014 “The tv Branch of the Catholic Association of Polish Journalists awarded the Polish Chamber of Ułańska award for "Best Patriotic Photography of 2013" This is the photograph. Since it was immediately loud about it, KSDP issued a message explaining that the image almost did not show a rainbow and that this award was presented due to the fact that there was a guy with a white-red flag.
Now we can decision on to “instruction to violence”. Here is Konrad Berkowicz, who wrote in his elonex account: "The installation of the rainbow on the Savior's Square is to cost almost a million zlotys. Arson her about PLN 100. I'm not suggesting anything. I only indicate how much it costs.”. The entry is inactive hanging. Yes, I am besides amazed that following Bosak's reasoning, the Polish right is ANTIFA. The chronicle work is to mention that protests against the reconstruction of the rainbow were the core of the National Movement's run in the 2014 European elections. Bosak even gained a beautiful image of the blockade erstwhile the police escorted him out.
Since we are already on this campaign, it is worth mentioning that Witold Tumanowicz (present MP for the National Movement, erstwhile Vice-President of the All-Polish Youth) produced an election poster during the campaign, on which he waved a wooden stick (most most likely the National Movement considered that a baseball bat would not be patriotic enough). Tumanovich rapidly found out that it was not the best idea, due to the fact that the malicious (they were not people, they were wolves) reworked the poster and alternatively of the szacheta, Tumanovich waved a large dildo on it.
The nationalist hooligan besides appeared in 2013, erstwhile they disrupted Magdalena Wednesday's lectures and then Sigismund Bauman. In the case of this first lecture, Ziemkiewicz commented on the full matter, who stated that it smelled like provocation to him, due to the fact that any people enter for the lecture and no 1 IDs them (I don't think it is essential to mention that, yes, they were legitimized and even proceedings were pending, but the prosecution did not state the marks of the forbidden act). Ziemkiewicz's work was so comic that Artur Zawisza (a national who later had problems with driving drunk) explained to him that he was incorrect due to the fact that they were truly nationalists. While in the case of Wednesday's lecture, the bald bromander left erstwhile she asked for their protection, Bauman's lecture prompted the nationalists to leave the area only a visit from the anti-terrorists. How did Krzysztof Bosak comment on political extremism? good of you to ask: "I don't think chanting shouts that individual disagrees with is simply a reprehensible thing. Those who want to express their protest have the right to do so. The lecture was an open event.” How was that excuse for violence, Sir Christopher?
Attention! An article sponsored by Sovereign!
https://patronite.pl/Piknik-on-country-g%C5%82upoty
Before I go further, I will make 88 (pun intended due to the subject) digression. You can't deny national rhetorical effectiveness. In a situation where their own environment is liable for a immense number of acts of violence, they manage to convince a large part of the public that the real threat is the mythical ANTIFA (mythical, due to the fact that although anti-fascist organizations are a small bit, they are not within 1 large organization, whose only origin is the passion for violence, which is, I don't know, for example, the National Movement).
As I already mentioned in the erstwhile tectonic layers of this text wall, in 2011 the PiS made a turn to gain an utmost right-wing (chuligan-national) electorate. Jarosław Kaczyński thought that to the right of PiSu nothing would grow anymore. individual malicious could at that point compose that the superb Strateg so planned it all, that until he grew the confere (or, in fact, two, due to the fact that Braun has his), which he now has to grovel against (yes, I know, now both parties are going to bang on each other, but I am so old that I remember the 2025 presidential election and how Mentzen, Bosak and Wipler behaved then) Since I am not malicious, I will compose only that this phrase was reflected in the increasingly harsh rhetoric utilized by the Law and Justice. Yes, since 2005, erstwhile Tusk had a fight with Kaczyński, the 2 biggest parties have been verbally intertwined and it did not look very beautiful at the time.
After that, it was only worse, although it is worth noting that until the minute of taking over the power, the United Right had to be limited to utilizing utmost rhetoric (and hence e.g. puking racism in 2015), but after the Kaczyński organization took over the power, it began to actively defend nationalists and kibolism from legal consequences. I'm just going to give a fewer examples, due to the fact that if I wanted to describe a complete list here, this wall of text would most likely be longer than Jormungand.
When on May 21, 2016, the daughter of the then councillor of PiS, Anna Kołakowska, was detained by the police for blocking the Equality March, Mariusz Błaszczak (the then head of the Ministry of abroad Affairs) had a faecal incidental and accused police officers of utilizing violent methods. erstwhile the investigation was carried out and everything was done according to the rules, The gibberish didn't go back. The common cognition was that Anna Kołakowska had connections with utmost right-wing environments. It is crucial that the same councilwoman a year later (May 2016) said to Agnieszka Pomaski (always on the occasion of this MP I have a minute of hesitation, due to the fact that I do not know if her name is changing) that: “This thing should be caught and shaved bald.” It would seem that in a situation where specified words fall from the mouth (or the keyboard) of a individual having such, alternatively than another connections, the prosecution should treat this as criminal threats? Nothing more wrong. Pomaska had to bring a subsidiary indictment, due to the fact that the prosecution twice decommissioned the Kołakowski case.
Let's keep moving. In 2017, nationalists (from various organizations, including the All-Polish Youth) organized an event on which they hung the likeness of Euro MPs. The D.A. again failed to see the signs of the forbidden act. As in the case of the PO MP, a subsidiary indictment was filed in this case. It ended with a conviction in 2023 (which was retained in 2024). Although the justice convicted the organizers of the event, she found that the specified placement of the political imagery in this case was within the limits of the public debate. All right, but what did Krzysztof Bosak gotta say about this fight against political extremism? ‘it was happening ... There's nothing to be ashamed of. Happenings are more or little successful, this 1 has hit very hard in the media, so it can be classified as successful.”
As Michael Rachon said: We are moving on. In 2017, the alleged March of independency was held, on which you will not believe racist slogans and neo-Nazi symbolism. Since it wasn't 2015 the police already knew that they shouldn't intervene. Mariusz Błaszczak himself said ‘The police had no reason to intervene. He explained that the banners carried by the participants of the march were not necessarily illegal due to the fact that they did not gotta mention to fascism or racism at all ... erstwhile asked about the slogan "White Europe only", he argued that "the associations [on these words] may be different". Yes, this slogan most likely meant that before climate change in Europe, there was quite a few snow in the winter and that is why it was white. erstwhile it got out loud, PiS' D.A. decided that they would inactive bow down, but what a shock, in the end no 1 was charged.
Do you remember TVN's birthday footage of an Austrian watercolorist? There, the prosecution worked (because it had no choice), but simultaneously Karnowskie media threw disinformation into public space (supported by another government media). Well, it wasn't like these people organized that birthday. no of that, it was all a TVNu setup. The portal inPolitics published about as many articles as the Russians send drones during attacks on Ukraine. Interestingly, Joachim Brudziński (the then head of the Ministry of abroad Affairs) besides intensified on this subject. A fewer years later, the portal inPoliticy published information about the fact that the organisers of known birthdays were convicted and, of course, were not caught in the article on the “journalary inquiry”, which was expected to indicate that it was a bill.
But it's even more interesting here due to the fact that TVN brought Karnowski to trial. In 2022, the court ruled that with this birthday it was so that it was not a setup. And then something incredible happened. Karnowski (i.e. I know it was Jacek Karnowski, but it was no difference) did not make an appeal. Why? This surely had nothing to do with the fact that there was no journalistic investigation, due to the fact that Karnowski media do not employment journalists. Here, we did not deal with the defence of nationalists by the prosecution, but PiSowski agitprop tried to convince people that it was not so that in Poland they were nazioles. Nothing like that. individual just manipulated them and told them to do it. The fact that the ABW tried to pin on a writer who infiltrated the Nazi strategy to advance totalitarian regimes for helicalizing with Nazis is not essential to mention, is it? As well as the fact that a full bunch of right-wing people explained that they would never heel (but I don't know if Winnicki and Chosenowski were as outraged). Before individual hehesheshs that it is Karnowski and who believes them there, let me usage an anecdata, for example, my country uncle believed it and something tells me that he was not the only individual who gave religion to these “determinations.”
There is no mention here of what PiSosko-ecclesiastical elegiebet hunt has led to. erstwhile the first March of Equality (July 20, 2019) was held in Białystok, there was almost a pogrom. In a situation where the utmost right has been immortalized on films, no 1 should uncertainty what happened there. At the time (yes, I am aware that the word “then” appears in this wall of the text more frequently than “dygression”) the deputy head of TVP Info, Daniel Liszkiewicz, had a different opinion on the subject and commanded (slowing down the video), that (werble) there was (werble, but twice louder) a setup. The convictions (e.g. for breaking the collarbone to 1 of the participants in the Equality March) did not prompt Mr Daniel to remove the Twitter entry. Just as the behaviour of the far right did not get Archbishop Jędraszewski to get the ball rolling, due to the fact that little than 2 weeks later he was gracious to dismiss the words about "the rainbow plague".
That was a lot more than that, but I'll halt there. The United Right did not go down erstwhile and as shortly as she could or helped the utmost right by waiving proceedings (which sometimes ended with convictions after the transportation of subsidiary indictments only due to the fact that the Kaczyński organization failed to do with the courts what was done with the prosecution), or by telling the sovereign that "It's all not so clear". PiS was so anxious to have a good relation with the people that they simply bought any of them with millions of public funds. Do you remember Jaruzel's speech by Kaczyński, who called for a organization act to “defence the churches”? To whom was this call addressed? Yes, I know, officially to the “supporters of the Law” but in practice it was answered mainly by nationalists and kiboles. Incidentally, only a actual genius and a truly large talker could talk in 1 "call" about the fact that protests against the tightening of abortion law are incorrect due to the fact that there is covid and that assemblies of more than 5 people are prohibited, and immediately thereafter call for the popular defence of churches.
Slowly, I would like to decision towards conclusions (although I am aware that I could most likely do it about 30,000 characters ago), but I request to mention a fewer more things. 1 of them is that the growth of the far right and the decision of the debate to the right is not solely liable for the superb Strategy. The media are besides responsible, which in pursuit of coverage published everything possible. The editors most likely had nothing to object to, due to the fact that erstwhile they saw that their published content (quotes/etc.) caused outrage, they convinced themselves that if so, nothing happened. Only that it is outrage (of all means right) is only 1 side of the medal. The second is that in this way utmost views entered mainstream. For (I will be gracious) let it be that 90% of the audience are outraged at the message (now it is unrealistic due to polarization, due to the fact that “our” is always allowed more than “the one”). The remaining 10% will come to the conclusion that since specified statements appear on mainstream portals, it means that "it can already be done".
This leads to the second point, which I have already signaled. Today, the public debate is no more "sharp" than the 1 we had in the "najentis" and early 21st century. And I know that a full bunch of right-wingers are trying to convince us all that they utilized to be, and now they don't have time, but that's bullshit. To anyone who would like to discuss this, I would like to remind you that in 1991, the vice minister could have been expelled for speaking nonsense about AIDS (a “sin sickness”) and calling elgiebets deviants. I bet that between 2015 and 2023 you could get a discrimination from Czarnek for a akin statement, and the Polish paper would most likely release any stickers in defence of a individual who would say specified nonsense. If there were specified a thing as a "cancel culture", then people like Jako, Mentzen, Berkovich, Matecki and many others would not have a chance of getting any mandate, due to the fact that even if they had got a place on the list, the sovereign would have voted for others "after anger".
And I realize that individual can rise the argument that from 2 evils, it is most likely better that we have a "only" intensified debate (i.e. symbolic violence) alternatively of what happened in the 1990s, due to the fact that specified average force is worse than symbolic violence. Only that this argument does not make much sense, due to the fact that at the end of this symbolic force there is always “ordinary” violence. Which you could see at the Sebix drive at the border. At the same time, the United Right and Confa were chasing “colored”. I think this is simply a good time to show how distorted the Polish debate is. Matecki publically boasted that they were flying a drone behind any random kind (the entry inactive hangs). Did Polish media take an interest in this? No way. Now imagine what would happen if Adrian Zandberg had bragged on Eloneks about flying a drone after any developer. This, although short-lived, hysteria made, for example, in Czestochowa on 26 July 2025, 30-year-old kibol Rakowa stabbed a Zimbabwean citizen ("old" kibol was accompanied by a 17-year-old kibol). This surely had nothing to do with the fact that on 22 July of the same year the protests "against migration" were held in which the kibole of Rakowa participated.
When specified things happen, the right hand cannot respond as harshly as erstwhile individual in protest against the tightening of abortion law uses vulgarism. Krzysztof Bosak, who fights extremism, does not seem to be critical. Of course, erstwhile he is drawn by a journalist, then it turns out that it is not their (right) responsibility and that is not what they want. It's just that somehow, these are almost always the same environments. Despite this, right-wing “researchers” like Marcin Palade request that ANTIFA be regarded as a “terrorist organization” in Poland. If it were not for the context, it would be rather comic that if individual Palade had said, "Okay, let's do this, but let's besides consider those terrorist organizations whose members have sentences as beatings, or ties to Organized Crime/etc."
The phenomenon is that the same people who attribute the evil of the planet to the mythical ANTIFIE, are already crimes committed by kiboli, nationalists/etc. are incapable to clearly attribute to any "party" of political dispute and to any organization. These are simply any crimes that “are happening” in isolation from any reality. The right is constant in this respect, due to the fact that Ziemkiewicz imposed specified a communicative 30 years ago. Besides, it must be remembered that the right-wing has long established a sign of equality between the Equality Marches and the wrecking of these marches. Although it's not rather so, due to the fact that the Equality March is evil, so breaking up, blocking them can't be bad, can it? In fact, I would like to remind you here that the Polish right does not usage the word "homoterrorism", so let us not anticipate besides much from them.
What bothers me most is that as a society (and in peculiar as regards people raised in what years) we are expected to be aware of this, but erstwhile Bosak or another Mentzen begins to wave the slogan “Ukraine”, “immigrant”, “heavenly man”, it abruptly turns out that, alternatively of reasoning about “what is going on”, we believe that seizures broken by nationals broken by kiboles just care about our safety. possibly they were chasing us in these najntis, possibly they were violent and attacking people on the streets, but this is surely about them simply having Poland in their hearts, due to the fact that they go on alleged March of independency annually. Before individual says, “Well, they are not the same as the 40 - year - olds: And yes, they are not “the same” people, but “there” people are raising their children, and there is no uncertainty about the values they teach them.
It seems to me that 1 of the biggest lies that part of my generation (gives +10 to old age for utilizing a phraseological relationship) has convinced itself that the utmost environment is actually about “others”. I don't care if they're chasing Ukrainians, migrants, or even white people. I'm not 1 of those groups. Well, they may sometimes choice on the incorrect guys, but, as I quoted earlier, the police chief said, "the boys must have been wrong." They may want to beat the elgiebets, but it is besides any of the responsibility of the others, for they are “successful.” To all those who come out of a akin assumption, I have 1 question: what will halt utmost right-wing environments from expanding the scope of the concept of “threat” from which they are expected to defend Poland and Poles? For example, left-wing organization activists. I mean, it's apparent that the lefties are kind of like that, and Zandberg utilized to have a T-shirt with Marks, so it'd be worth it, wouldn't it? Or will they start chasing men with long hair (as these environments did not long ago)?
To anyone who would like to accuse me in your place, that I am making it up, I would like to remind you that the Polish right hand was doing something like “Redwatch”. It was a page on which the far right was correcting people he didn't like. It could have been a left-wing journalist, a feminist studying sociology, an elgiebet activist, or, for example, a advanced school student who helped clean up kircut. There was quite a few information about where a individual could be found on the website (I remember that it was described rather thoroughly, which trains 1 individual rode [where she got on, where she got off, and at what time she drove them], sometimes there was besides information that, as if it had something to be careful about, due to the fact that it may not be easy to get down. In the context of what the United Right was doing in 2015-2023, it is ironic that for the first time for these Polish naziols (to be exact, there was no uncertainty about the belonging of the authors of the site) the prosecution ordered by Ziobra took place. True, the authors of this web page went to jail, but then individual else led the website. I would love it if it were my inventions, but unfortunately it's not. A separate issue is that with this "belief" in good intentions of the far right, it is simply a bit as if individual had read “The Diary Found in Lichen” Ahmed Goldstein and, after reading, concluded that "yes, that is the direction we should be heading".
I don't usually do that, but this time I'm gonna make an exception. It will be anecdata, but I will add PDK at its beginning, or “who knows who knows”. Well, any time ago it turned out that on the interior communicator of 1 of the leftist parties, a certain leftist politician (who should know better due to the fact that he besides perfectly remembers the Najntiss) explained that possibly the fascists at the border behave like this and not otherwise, but there is nothing to focus on them, due to the fact that the pillars of support are more important. And you know, I realize that support poles are important, but I think that these posts will not be as crucial at a time erstwhile the utmost right will feel that it is time to start fighting a left-wing threat and, for example, it will start entering organization meetings (as it had previously entered lectures), intimidate participants of these meetings or simply silence them (Bąkiewicz has practice, due to the fact that in 2021 he was jamming pro-EU so-PO). Being submissive to this environment makes Krzysztofy Bosaki publically say things for which they would have been ridiculed not long ago (requesting for right-wing fighters/etc.).
I mentioned before that for the right hand (although not only for her, due to the fact that a large number of journalists in our country endure from the same condition), all crime, beating, arson/etc. whose perpetrator is simply a right-wing individual is simply a "separate case". For me, it's kind of like scouting. At the utmost right-wing organizations check what they can afford. If we give in to them as a society or, worse still, praise them for “taking matters into our own hands” (as a left-wing messenger did), then we can wake up in a reality where the far right holds us by the mouth. Of course, not all, and not at once, due to the fact that it will begin with “enemies.”
No 1 who remembers 2015-2023 can number on you to defend us from the far right if you do. possibly otherwise: now it can defend us (not as effectively as it should, but nevertheless). If, after the next election, we are ruled by a coalition of PiSu and Conf (or PiSu and 2 conf), then we will not be able to number on any support from the state due to the fact that the state will be the utmost right. And you don't gotta force your brain to figure out which way it's gonna go. In 2015-2023 Ziobrokratura (but besides the Ministry of abroad Affairs) did her best to defend the utmost right from legal consequences. The only fuse that was not completely run over by the Law and Justices were the courts, but Jarosław Kaczyński practically after it turned out that Morawiecki would not collect the majority, however, said that if they won again, they would do everything in order and this time the courts would not remain.
I have already described the mechanics operating between 2015 and 2023, but let us remind you: if the utmost rightist did something, first the boys and girls from Zbyszek Umarzator (the case of Kołakowskia, nationalists hanging pictures of politicians/etc.). If the case could not be resolved due to the "social pressure", then the prosecution started proceedings, but it turned out that no 1 could be "attached" (the case of neo-Nazi symbolism and racist banners from the alleged March of Independence). If this could not happen (for example, the full Poland saw naziols celebrating the birthday of an Austrian watercolorist or beatings on the Equality March in Białystok), then it was essential to accuse individual and the case ended up in court. At the same time, disinformation campaigns were launched, which meant that "it is not so unambiguous" (truth, Mr Liszkiewicz and Mr Karnowski?). And, yes, in those fewer cases in which the extremes could not be protected there were convictions, but if courts were taken over by the Law and Justices, they would act as prosecutors and convictions may not be. And it will explain to the sovereign in parallel, that all of this is not at all as the lefties presented to us.
Yes, I know, there are all those gramanic tribunals that can then criticize the Law and Justice for such, not another actions and impose penalties, but first of all, specified a procedure continues, and secondly, let us remember that the Przyłębski Tribunal ruled the superiority of Polish law over this bad abroad law, so in the good case Jarosław (or his successor) will be able to tell himself that in these abroad languages to whom else the tribunals of the Rotten West would turn their ass.
The most depressing thing about this is that erstwhile these things are already happening and erstwhile things are truly bad, then the voices of journalists and parts of society will be raised, that things are terrible, but no 1 could have predicted. And I am convinced that these people will say it/write it completely honestly. The same people, besides completely sincerely marvel at what is now happening in the US, where Trump, together with his surroundings, is trying to (fully) take the full country by the mouth. And no of these people (mainly those who consider themselves journalists) will think that if the United Right erstwhile returns to power (either alone or with conf/conf), the script will be identical. And it's not even that the United Right and Confision brought themselves to the function of exposing the MAGA movement to Poland, but that the foundation for the future execution of the Law and Justice has laid down for 8 years of its rule. But why consider what will happen and why play any predictions, why comment in any way on Bosak's statements, who advocated giving rights to militants, why even remember what the far right has been doing for many years? Why do all of this, since much little intellectual effort is to “speak.” And just as during the pandemic we were rocking the waves of illness, so now we will be rocking the waves of "surprise."
And then I'm going to end this wall of text. I can't compose that it's a "pessimistic" accent, due to the fact that unfortunately the accent is "realist" by far. I can add at the very end that this is most likely the longest subject dedicated to 1 subject. I would besides like to add that on the 1 hand, no subject has so much exhausted me, and on the other, I have not had specified a large interior request to bend over a subject. I would like to be able to compose that I sincerely hope that in a fewer years we will all be able to laughter and conclude that everything I have written above can be fastened with a clamp "black vision", but unfortunately it is not. I can only compose that if we are very lucky, it may “work”, but this is the only consolation I can offer you.
Source:
Celtic and Prohibition Registration (not known
of which:
https://www.rawo.pl/laws-sads/sad-dopuscil-sads-sads-sads-sadscil-sads-sads-sads-sadscil-sads-sads-sads-sads-sads-sads-sads-sads-sads-sads-sadscil-sads-sads-sads-sads-sads-sads-sads-sadscils-nop-min-celtic cross,42175.html
Ombudsman
He then appealed:
https://www.gasetaprrawna.pl/news/articles/589650,sad-re-re-re-re-re-re-record-symbol-nop-in-tem-prohibit-pedaling.html
Final refusal of registration:
https://news.wp.pl/sad-revyl-nop-registration-m-in-pronounce-pedaling-6032732800332929a
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/06/14/us/minesota-shootings-manhunt-vance-boelter-invs
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/5502257-utah-governor-spencer-cox-trump/
https://www.facebook.com/Podkast.Disinformational/posts/pfbid02kF6xWMykTnH4C8UuuiHSsyLFFpcSDBMwLBqW8LtfP5MRAJZtjRXnTSnVCRFEKDkl
https://polskieradio24.pl/Article/1983486, harmed-in-action-videlec-talk-enough-hundreds-thousands-golden-discharge
Mine
rainbow arson note:
https://picnik-on-country-glupoty.blogspot.com/2014/01/Catholic-pogarda.html
https://www.ksd.media.pl/updates/1762-rewards-for-best-photography-patriotic-year-2013
https://natemat.pl/100955,candidate-move-national-revolution-to-violence-photo-from-shat-i-pogonimy-barroso-schultza-i-lewandowski
https://www.gasetarawna.pl/news/articles/71342,nationals-on-disc-professor-bauman-on-sale-must-enter-anti-terrorists.html
html
https://www.gasetaprrawna.pl/news/articles/691050,is-in-case-of-the-interpretation-srodes-on-which-wdarli-sie-nationals.html
https://www.rp.pl/country/Article5471301-nikt-no-reply-for-contribution-prof-srodes-investigation-refused
https://www.gasetarawna.pl/news/articles/71342,nationals-on-disc-professor-bauman-on-sale-must-enter-anti-terrorists.html
html
https://www.gasetarawna.pl/news/articles/957653,after-let's-blaszczak-sorry-police-for-critic-after-stopping-corca-radical-pis.html
https://www.gasetarawna.pl/news/Articles/1389520, you need-to-cos-zlapac-i-golic-na-lyso-is-the-word-in-the-post-radical-pis.html
https://oko.press/criminals-from-marsz-independence-2017-unpunished
https://wpolitics.pl/politics/420220-internauts-shocked-possibly-status-with-birth-hitler
https://wpoliticy.pl/politics/421423-Brudzinski-pokat-owners-tvn-about-birthday-hitler
https://wpoliticy.pl/media/420145-only-u-nasakfamily-hitler- former-mascarada-we know-kulisy
https://wpolitics.pl/criminal/600773-sad-exit-w-w-circumvention-birth-hitler
https://x.com/Dan_Liszkiewicz/status/115284208416116736?s=20
https://tvn24.pl/whitestok/whitestok-marsz-river-bike-teen-year-old-adult-in-one-day-st4329303
https://oko.press/kosciol-lgbt-marsz-whitestok
https://oko.press/nationals-from-Bakiewicz-with-3-million-grant-from-government-fund
https://electoral.pl/7,75398,26445890,kaczynski-calls-to-defence-kosciolow-bronmy-polski.html
Teresa Toranska “We” (specifically speaking with
Jan Krzysztof Bielecki)
https://x.com/DariuszMattecki/status/1947011874706387172
https://www.tvp.info/88074474/common-kibic-racial-poor-attack-foreigner-from-Rasist-provided
https://x.com/MarcinPalade/status/1969090338263273809
On Wiki, it was very well described what
dealt with Redwatch:
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redwatch
https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/2011-04-22:_Three_editors_Redwatch_discipline_on_kary_wi%C4%99
![Nocne posiedzenie Sejmu. Trwa sprawozdanie w sprawie Ziobry [RELACJA NA ŻYWO]](https://cdn.wiadomosci.onet.pl/1/hb1k9lBaHR0cHM6Ly9vY2RuLmV1L3B1bHNjbXMvTURBXy81MTM5M2U3ZTM0NTRmYzMwZDkwMWZlYzg5M2VjODc0ZC5qcGeSlQMAzKLNFCDNC1KTBc0JYM0GQN4AAqEwB6ExBA)
