"This mode of action means trying to force the president of the Republic of Poland to accept the effects of the procedure burdened with constitutional defects" - wrote Bogucki on platform X, referring to the writing he sent to the talker of the Sejm today. According to the Head of the NRP, "the position of the Sejm on the election of the TK judges does not answer the fundamental constitutional doubts".
"Mr. Marshal demands the president immediately to take his oath from the persons indicated, without giving reliable answers or explanations in advance about the course of this procedure" - reads Bogucki's entry.
"This mode of action means attempt to force the president of the Republic of Poland to accept the effects of the procedure burdened with constitutional defects, while the Sejm waives its work for its own informed omissions and violations" - stressed the Head of the NRP.
TK dispute. The Sejm elected six judges
On Monday to The Wizard letter Head of KPRP Zbigniew Bogucki stated that the position Chancellery of Parliament on the procedure for the selection of judges Constitutional Court does not respond to fundamental constitutional doubts raised by the President.
SEE: The palace wants an "urgent explanation" on the election of the TK judges. Letter to the talker of the Sejm
Parliament made selection of six Judges of the Constitutional Tribunal - whose applications have been formally submitted by Bureau of the SejmIn fact, through the clubs of the government coalition - 13 March.
Last Wednesday, the head of the NRP reported on X that he turned to Marshal of the Sejm to explain to the president how the Sejm has chosen these judges and answers to circumstantial questions. He then pointed out that the examination of the process of appointing the judges of the Constitutional Tribunal "is raising very serious doubts" on the compatibility of the procedure with Regulations of the Sejm and Constitution of the Republic of Poland.
The dispute over TK. Bogucki directed the letter to Czarzaste
Head of the Chancellery of the Sejm Marek Siwiec replied to the letter of the head of the presidential law firm on Thursday. However, as he estimated on Monday's entry on X Bogucki, Siwiec magazine did not answer the fundamental constitutional doubts raised by president Karol Nawrocki and asked questions about. Procedures for the selection of judges of the Constitutional Tribunal, and besides avoided "referring to the essence of the case".
Therefore, Bogacki, as he reported, directed to Marshal Black A letter requesting clarification of 2 points. The handwriting scan was attached in an X entry published by him.
SEE: Bosak changes his head about the vows of the TK judges. Indicates the Constitution
"First of all, no answer was given to the question why the selection of judges on 13 March 2026 was not applied. constitutional rule of individualisation of vocations expressed in Article 194(1) of the Constitution" - wrote Bogucki.
This rule - as the head of the NRP added - assumes that election of the justice of the Constitutional Tribunal must stay "in close connection with a circumstantial vacancy and a circumstantial word of office", and must not be treated as a "collective policy act relating simultaneously to multiple posts".
Bogacki besides noted that in the past Parliament made the choice Judges of the Constitutional Tribunal on "the specific, individually marked place, relating to the word of office of a peculiar justice whose mandate expired within a specified period". He assessed that the selection of six Judges of the Court is so contrary not only to the Constitution of Poland, but besides to the seismic practice.
Therefore, Head of the NRP He asked the talker of the Sejm why the proposals concerning individual candidates for judges of the Constitutional Tribunal did not indicate "in the place where a justice whose word of office has expired on a circumstantial date is elected a candidate for judge".
Bogacki sent a letter to Czarzaste. Reason for the selection of the judges of the Constitutional Tribunal
Bogacki stated that he did not get from Chancellery of Parliament besides answers to the second question - why the Sejm did not take action to filling vacancies as judges of the Constitutional Tribunal in due time, although the expiry dates of the individual word of office were known in advance. He stressed that this issue besides active violation of the Polish Constitution.
"Apostasy of taking the procedure at the time prescribed by law and then cumulatively after the next word of office was a clear departure from the rules of appropriate and predictable filling positions in the constitutional body" - stated the head of the NRP.
SEE: A dispute over the oath of the TK judges. The Court will address the President
He besides assessed that the deficiency of answers of the Chancellery of the Sejm to this circumstantial - as he emphasized - the question "should be read as a silent confession that the deficiency of action of the government coalition was calculated to paralyze by the Government and the majority of parliamentary activities Constitutional Court and the deliberate demolition of this constitutional body."
The head of the NRP called on the talker of the Sejm to present to the president the motives that justify specified action.
Did you see anything important? Send a picture, a movie, or compose what happened. usage our Inductors
