President Donald Trump has been working with the media since the beginning of his office, organizing and participating in press conferences, eagerly and exhaustively answering questions, giving extended interviews. Already in the first fewer weeks he participated in more media events than Joe Biden throughout his full presidency. This frequency is maintained even though a year has passed. Besides, all Biden and Harris interviews were set and questions prepared earlier. Trump responds spontaneously and without agreeing questions.
However, the media, and in Poland in peculiar TVN, like to tell us that president Donald Trump does not like the media, and that is why he is at war with them. As examples, he cites the lawsuits he has made and won for media failure. Another example is the mocking remarks or the President's lair, and this time Trump critic journalists forget about journalistic failures, unreliableness or aggressive attacks that they were the answer to.
So alternatively of talking about the war on the media, you should be talking about Trump's war on media infidelity?
Here's another part of Trump. wars with media. On Monday, November 10, Polish tv broadcasts told us about a wave of resignations in the BBC, enigmatically informing us that they had something to do with the presentation of cases, any of which afraid the president of the United States. I think it is worth knowing a small more about the case than the Polish media are serving us.
On Sunday Washington Post published an article entitled: The leading leaders of the BBC resign due to controversy surrounding the edition of Trump's speech. Similarly, UK Telegraph.
The beginning of the communicative occurred last year, just before the November elections. Then the BBC aired in primetime an extended programme about events on January 6 at the Capitol, which combines Trump's 2 comments, glued the passages of the speech 54 minutes apart. The president said,
We're going to the Capitol, and I'll be with you. I know that everyone here is about to march into the Capitol building to express your voices peacefully and patrioticly.
However, the BBC gave a fake, assembled version, where a section from a distant location was glued to the greasy below:
We'll go to the Capitol, I'll be with you. And we will fight. We'll fight like hell, and if you don't fight like hell, you won't have a country anymore.
Such fabricated material was expected to prove that Trump was inciting violence. Here is simply a YouTube video showing both clips side by side – the fake 1 and the first one:
BBC Leadership Crumbles Over Trump Video Drama
In January that year, the signalist reported a modified BBC management clip. At the BBC editorial standards committee gathering on 12 May, BBC deputy news manager Jonathan Munro summed up this manipulated passage:
It wasn't. no effort to misleadThe audience's content and character of Mr Trump's speech before the Capitol riot. [...]
Editing speeches in the form of short clips It's average practice..
They're trying to tell us that the BBC is ho, ho, ho, top standards of journalism, and here's one. normal practice glued someone's statements from any selected pieces.
Later in June, a frustrated BBC writer gathered extensive “dossier” of evident biased BBC articles, which included the editing of Trump-related material as well as the BBC's false messages on a number of issues, from transsexuals to illegal migration and racism in car credit and the Gaza War.
The intense signaling activity was disposed of or ignored by the BBC leadership until 6 November. UK Telegraph 7 November:
War sparked Trump's press secretary Karoline Leavitt, who stated for The Telegraph:
This deliberately dishonest, selectively assembled BBC clip is another proof that it is completely false messages which are no longer worth the time spent on displaying on tv screens the large people of the United Kingdom.
[...]
Every time I go to Britain with president Trump, and I'm forced to watch the BBC in hotel rooms, it ruins my day., Because I perceive to their insolent propaganda and lies about the president of the United States and everything he does to make America a better place and the planet a safer place.
This week Parliament plans to hold hearings on the gross bias of the BBC. Members stated that the BBC must now "go through a major reconstruction". Nigel Farage, leader of the UK Reform, called for a "total change" in the BBC.
As a consequence of the public hearing, the CEO of the BBC stepped down (president?) Tim Davie and news chief Deborah Turnness. The Telegraph added that elder BBC staff including Jonathan Munro (who called the assembled clip with Trump “normal practice”) “are besides under force to leave in a situation that is considered the worst crisis in the BBC Since the Jimmy Savile scandal in 2012’.
Call Jimmy Savile’a au The Telegraphgives you an thought of how large the Clipgate affair can be. Jimmy Savile was a longtime presenter and personality of the BBC as well as best known pedophile in Britain, which for decades has avoided punishment for the scariest forms of kid abuse that can be imagined, while the BBC leadership consciously turned a blind eye to it. The scandal came to light only after Savile's death in 2011.
So if they compare Clipgate to Jimmy Savile, it cannot be worse. Meanwhile, the BBC has avoided any work for the Clipgate affair for many months and for many another cases of breaking journalistic ethics for years and only “War on Media“ president Trump changed something about it.
Our media could usage the shock treatment they're receiving. Big Bullshit Corporation.
Thank you for reading Substack Jack! Subscribe for free to receive fresh posts and support my work.
And just in the margins. Recently, Trump’s administration has caused another earthquake in Britain. On the occasion of the disclosure of papers in the case of billionaires Jeffrey Epstein, the heads of respective very high-profile individuals fell. For example, a temporary GB ambassador to the US Peter Mandelson and a associate of the royal household Prince Andrew were struck. And that's what this erratic Trump does. No wonder they don't like him so much and effort to defame and downplay him.
On a further margin, which is unrelated to the subject of respective images I generated utilizing AI
