Eternal surviving Pink Salon

niepoprawni.pl 1 week ago

Many environments would be happy to put down a large writer, Waldemar Baldsik, at a loss. This author struck the authority of our republic by coining the word “pink salon” in the book Rzeczpospolita lysterów. surviving room. This slogan is simply a collective word for people from the planet of media, entertainment, culture and politics, which advance anti-Polish behaviours that have held crucial functions in public life since the transition period. We can presume that the terms pseudo-elite, lie-elite and pink salon are identical. The dispute between elites and pseudo-elites is not a fresh phenomenon. Even in Adam Mickiewicz's grandfathers the Warsaw salon and patriotic salon were presented. The erstwhile consisted mainly of French-speaking light-spirited, completely indifferent to Poland's case. On the another hand, the another camp thought and lived the Homeland. Do we not see any parallels to the present? Given historical events, we can safely presume that the reluctance to reform, as well as the long-term power of traitors, sellouts, hoochsztaplers, cosmopolitans, can lead us to fresh partitions.

Definition

Let's make a conceptual discrimination right away. Both elites and pseudo-elites are groups of people who hold the highest position in the social hierarchy. The difference is that the elites are guided by the common good, reasoning in the future, while the pseudo-elites are guided by the peculiar good. We can separate financial, scientific, political, media, military, police, official, etc. A characteristic feature of the nation and national elites is to have national consciousness, that is to say, a sense of belonging to the historical Polish nation. On the another hand, lying-elites are cosmopolitan, nationalized, purely Polish-speaking, focused exclusively on current consumption. While the real elites want the freedom and sovereignty of the Homeland, pseudo-elity wants to be part of the collective farm, erstwhile the russian Union and now the European Union. actual higher layers advance real philanthropy, honor, decency and honesty, and false higher layers advance selfishness, false philanthropy for show, rudeness, stupidity, and bland humor.

A part of the pseudo-elite are the educated. It is, however, a narrower concept, primarily for those deprived of erudition. all education is simply a lie-elita, but not all representatives of a lie-elita are educated. Pseudoelity can besides be perfectly educated, but they follow destructive intellectual trends. As an educator, we can consider a individual who has completed a “higher gas cooking school”, a provincial university that does not teach specialists and managers, but mass production of diplomas. Due to the fact that the education received a master's professional title, he has tremendous grievances towards the full world, self-centered self-esteem, coupled with unwavering belief in his destiny for higher purposes. specified a individual cannot stain himself with physical work – after all, “Nobility does not work”.

When Waldemar Lysiak wrote his Republic of liars, the pink surviving area had a concrete face: Adam Michnik, Jack Kuronia, Bronisław Geremek, Tadeusz Mazowiecki, Czesław Miłosz, Wisława Szymborska, etc. These themes of the book have been partially outdated for simple reasons. Most of the people on that list are already dead. Unfortunately, their views have survived, either to offspring or to many epigons.

Modernity

According to the author of this column, the present lie-elites consist mainly of left-liberal environments. These are those who attack the household and intercede for sodomites and gomorites in the age of demographic collapse. These are those who are social media narcissists who like to have a dog alternatively of a child. These are those who adhere to bambiism and eco-terrorism who stick to the roadway during climate protests. These are the actors who mocked the President's death in Smolensk. These are the people who mock the children of opposition politicians, mixing the innocent into a dirty power struggle. These are those who have love and tolerance on their lips, while in reality they hatred all those who do not think as they do, demanding the abolition of freedom of speech, or the penalization of the alleged "talk of hatred". The humorous word "Young, educated and from large centres" is rather appropriate here.

In view of the late prof. Bogusław Wolniewicz, the most effective feature of the left is his stupidity. Today, with fresh experience, we can extend this thought much, as we see more of the disadvantages of these pathological social groups. due to the fact that these people are besides characterized by unimaginable pride, ostentatious conviction of their own moral and intellectual superiority. Looking in the mirror they see: a Warsaw, educated, better species of man. In practice, their views are a deadly mix of cosmopolitanism, postmodernism and globalism.

The well-being of the lying-elite storms from time to time voters from the east wall who do not vote as they should. That's erstwhile embarrassing statements begin: if you supported candidate X, delete my number, remove you from my friends, I won't let individual who has 1 or another political preferences into my house, I'm about to leave here in the light west. Unfortunately, these statements end only with announcements, as they would do their country a favor. They feel through the skin that they will revolt against their sick worldview maintains the state of the country.

Due to the triumph of anticulture in the planet of Okcident, artistic environments are frequently filled with hatred for their fellow countrymen. An example is the Green Border film, which we can fundamentally consider as an anti-Polish pashquil. This production is simply a pardonless attack on uniformed services that defend our Homeland. Just as all animal defends its territory from strangers, so are Polish soldiers to guarantee our safety. This is about self-preservation instinct, endurance instinct, the ability to separate ourselves from a alien – we are those natural tendencies any directors would like to clearly deprive. The second example is the Warsaw Studio Theatre. He exhibited a controversial play (for public money) in which Poles execution thousands of Muslim migrants. These people absolutely do not realize their madness – if they function in the conditions of a real muslim state, for their leftist-liberal views they would be deprived of life by fundamentalists. In another words, they are defending their possible torturers [sic!].

In the above mentioned Granddads of the time, the social elite praised the balls at Senator Nowosilcov's. The current social elite praises the yearly Christmas fundraiser of Saint Juras. Of course, participation in this event is only a show of coolpolacy. Here, it was never about real aid for one’s neighbor, but about satisfying one’s vanity, the chance to shine on social media. Similarly, in Lalka Boleslawa Prusa, the aristocracy conducted issues only to guarantee amusement to show itself in company. In another words, the level of wealth and technology has changed over the centuries, but human hypocrisy has remained the same.

Conclusion

The confrontation between actual elites and pseudo-elitists can be considered permanent. If this first group dominates, reality flourishes. If the another group dominates, everything falls. There are akin clashes in another countries. The political and economical success of our country, our nation, depends on which side of this conflict wins. past is simply a discipline that besides shows us how pride treads before a fall, how rotten and inept systems have repeatedly been thrown into the ground by battled invaders, how powerful empires were scattered like a castle of sand.

We live in specified an unreasonable, naive belief that the 3rd Republic will last and endure. And it is not certain, for it is clearly rotting. With current demographic trends and rising debt levels, we can besides vanish from maps at our own request. While elites call for reforms, to modernise Poland, pseudo-elity wants to proceed in its comfortable nest, they see all programs of change as demands for losing their acquired privileges. Their motto? We're even a flood.

Author: ]]>Karol Skorek]]>

Read Entire Article