— The prosecutors are working and will successively prepare further applications. It is inevitable that this case does not end with Mateusz Morawiecki. More people were active in this,” said Adam Bodnar on the case of erstwhile Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki.
He assessed that further proposals were a substance of "a fewer weeks, months". — In the case of Mateusz Morawiecki, the case was easier due to the fact that there were legal opinions, witness statements. Moreover, in this case, we had previously had the ruling of the Chief Administrative Court, which stated that the Prime Minister had committed a gross violation of the law,” added the Minister, explaining that the remaining cases "require more comprehensive action".
The programme leader Marcin Zawada asked the minister if he was afraid that the politicians of the United Right would want to follow in the footsteps of Marcin Romanowski? “We have in the European Union the free movement of persons and the free choice of a place to settle and things can happen. On the another hand, all specified individual must be aware of the consequences. Just due to the fact that someone's leaving doesn't origin state inactivity. The State will proceed to do everything, and it will be written for months to bring specified a individual in,” Bodnar said.
Who will regulation on the importance of elections? "An interesting solution has emerged"
The writer besides asked who would regulation on the validity of the presidential election? “I don’t think it should be the Chamber of Control of the Extraordinary ultimate Court. Yesterday, the work of the parliamentary committee of justice was underway, and there was 1 interesting solution. The Constitution says that the validity of the election determines the SN, but the remainder is governed by the SN Act. If we make a method change to it, a procedure can be created that respects the constitution and, on the another hand, guarantees citizens. It was proposed that this should be the ruling panel in the SN, consisting of the oldest elder judges,” explained the Minister of Justice.
Bodnar rejects allegations about the pace of settlement of the Law and Justice. He mentioned names.
The next subject was the issue of free pace of settlement of irregularities from the times of the Law and Justice. “I am a citizen too, and in my head it is simply a belief that I would like to see the consequence here and now. It's natural. We're utilized to pictures from movies and shows. There's a procedure in 1 episode, there's a consequence in the other. It's not that simple in life. We have a peculiar person, a prosecutor, a superior. Imagine that the conclusion on Matthew Morawiecki is written rapidly on his knee. It goes to the Sejm, the Rules Committee debates the waiver of immunity, and abruptly Members find: "Here's a mistake, here's a mistake, here you have not checked it, here you have wrongly formulated proposals". The prosecutor is under public scrutiny, journalists saying, “Who works here, what are we paying them for?” That's why it takes so long,” said Adam Bodnar.
— The prosecutor takes individual responsibility. Therefore, it must be well prepared. If we look at the statistics, we have the waiver of the immunity of Mr. Woś and Romanowski, Mr. Mezza gave up immunity, now there are others waiting — Szczucki, Ardanowski, Morawiecki. 5 applications are pending — Mr Braun, Mr Dworczyk, Mr Wąsik, Mr Kamiński and Mr Obatek — were mentioned by politicians.
